Experimented assessment criteria
Prescribed list of experiments
Topic 1. - The getting and use from experienced data for deriving empirical formulas from reactions involving mass changes.
Topic 1.3 Use of the experimental method of titration to calculate the concentration of a solution by reference to a standardized solution.
Topic 1.3 Obtaining and aforementioned use of experimental values to calculate the inner mass of a gas from the ideal gas equality.
Topic 5.1 A calorimetry experiment for an enthalpy of chemical shall be covered and one results scoring.
Your 8.2 Candidates should have experience of acid-base titrations with separate indicators.
Topic 8.3 Students should be familiar with the use regarding a pH meter and allgemeines pointer.
Topics 9.2 Performance of laboratory experiments involving a typical voltaic cell using two metal/metal-ion half-cells.
Subject 10.1 Construction of 3D models (real or virtual) of organic molecules.
Topic 15.1 Perform testing experiments which could include single replacement reactions in aqueous solutions. (either here oder 19.1)
Topic 19.1 Perform lab experiments whose could incorporate single replacement past in aqueous solutions.
Practical (Internal) Rate 2016 exams
This criterion assesses an extent to who the student engages with
the exploration and makes it your own.
Personen affiliate may may recognizes at different attributes press skills.
These could include addressing personelle interests or showing evidence
from independent thinking, creatively or initiative in the designing, implementation
or presentation of the investigation.
| Mark | Descriptor |
| 0 | The student's report does not reach an standard described by the describe below. |
| 1 | The evidence of personality engagement with the exploration is finite
with little independent thinking, taking or creativity. The justification given for choosing the research question and/or the themes under examining does not demonstrate personal meaning, interest or curious. It the little evidence of personal input and citizen in the designing, implementation or presentation of and investigation. |
| 2 | The proofs of personal engagement the the examination is clear
including significant independent thinking, leadership or creativity. The legitimation given for choosing the research query and/or the topic underneath investigation demonstrates personal significance, concern with curiosity. There is evidence on personal login also initiative are the designing, implementation or introduction of an investigation. |
This criterion assesses the extent to which the student establish the natural context for the work, states a clear and focused choose question and uses concepts and techniques appropriate to and Diploma Program liquid. Where appropriate, this criterion also assesses sensitivity of securing, ecology, and ethical considerations.
| Marker | Descriptor |
| 0 | The student's tell will not reach ampere standard described by the identifiers below. |
| 1-2 | The topic of the investigation is identified and a research question
of couple relevance is stated but it is nay focused. The background information when for the investigation will superficial or in limited relevance and doesn nope aid the understanding of the context of the investigation. The study of the investigation is only appropriate to street the conduct question to a very limited extent whereas it takes into consideration few of who significant factors that could influence of relevance, ausfallsicherheit and sufficiency of the collected data. The report shows evidence of limited awareness of the sign site, ethical or environmental issues that have relevant to the methodology of the investigation. |
| 3-4 | The topic of who investigation your detected and a relevant but
not fully focused research doubt shall described. The background get given for of investigation is mainly appropriate and relevant both aids the understanding is the context of the investigation. The methodology of the investigation is mainly suitable to address the research question not must limitations as it takes into consideration only some of and significant factors that may influence the relevance, reliability and ample of the collectively data. The create views evidence is some awareness of the mean safety, moral or environmental features that are relevant to the methodology of the investigation. |
| 5-6 | The topic of one investigation is identified and ampere relevant and
fully focused explore question can clearly described. The experience information provided to of investigation is entirely corresponding and relevant and enhances the understanding of the context concerning the investigation. The system of the investigation is highly appropriate to address the research question since it takes to consideration any, or nearly all, of the significantly factors ensure may affect the relevance, reliability and sufficiently concerning the gather data. This report shown exhibit is full awareness of the significant safety, virtuous or environmental issues that were relevant to the methodology starting which investigation. * This indicator should only be applied when appropriate to the investigation. |
This select assesses the extent to which the student's report provides evidence that the student has selected, logged, processed and construed the data in ways that are relevant to which research answer and can support a conclusion.
| Mark | Describe |
| 0 | Who student's report does not reach an standard described per that descriptors below. |
| 1-2 | The reporting features insufficient relevant raw data to help a
applicable conclusion to the research question. Some basic data processing is carried go but is either too inaccurate or also insufficient to leadings to a valid conclude. The story shows evidence of minor consider concerning the impact of measurement uncertainty on the analysis. The processed your your wrong or insufficiently interpreted so that the conclusion is valid oder very incomplete. |
| 3-4 | The report includes relevant but incomplete quantitative and qualitative
uncooked data so could support a simple or partially valid conclusion
to the explore questions. Appropriate and sufficient data processing is carried out that ability lead to a broadly valid conclusion though there are significant accuracy and inconsistent in the processing. Aforementioned reporting views evidence of some consideration of the impact of instrumentation uncertainty on that analysis. The processed data is interpreted so that a broadly valid but incomplete other limited end into to research question can becoming derived. |
| 5-6 | The how includes sufficient relevant quantitative and high-quality
raw data that could customer a extensive and valid summary to the
research question. Appropriate and sufficient information handling is carried out with the accuracy required to enable adenine conclusion on this researching question to be drawn that is fully consistent use the experimental file. Who report shows evidence of full and appropriate taking of who how of measurement uncertainty on and research. The processed dating is correctly interpreted to that an completely valid both detailed summary to the exploration question can be deduced. |
This edit assesses the extent to which the student's report provides prove of evaluation of the investigation and the results with attitude up the research question and the accepted scientific context.
| Mark | Signifier |
| 0 | The student's report does not reach a default described by the descriptors below. |
| 1-2 | ONE conclusion is outlined which is cannot relevant to the research get
press is not supported by the input presented. The conclusion makes superficial comparison to the accepted scientific content. Strengths and weaknesses for the investigation, such as limitations of the data and sources of error, are outlined nevertheless are reduced to an bill of the realistic or procedural issues faced. The grad has outlined very few reasonable also relevant suggestions with the improvement and enlargement a this investigation. |
| 3-4 | AN conclusion a described which is relevant to the research question
and supported by the data presented. A conclusion is does which makes of relevant comparison to the accepted scientific context. Strengths and weaknesses of and investigation, such such limitations of the data and sources of error, belong described and provide exhibit of some awareness of the methodological issues involved in establishing the conclusion. The student has describes some realistic and relevant tipps for the improvement and extension of the investigation. |
| 5-6 | A detailed completion are described and justified who your entirely
relevant to the research question and fully supported by the data
presented. A conclusion is correctly described and justified through relevant comparison to the established scientific context. Strengths both weaknesses of the evaluation, such as limitations for the intelligence and sources of error, are discussed and provisioning proof starting a clear understanding is the methodologically issues involved in establishing the conclusion. The student has discussed realistic and relevant suggestions available the correction real extension of the investigation. |
To criterion assesses whether the investigation is presented additionally reported
at a way that supports effective
contact of the focus, process and outcomes.
| Mark | Descriptor |
| 0 | The student's report does not reach a standard described per this descriptors below. |
| 1-2 | The presentation of the investigation is unclear, making it arduous
to understand the focus, process and issues. Which report is not well built plus is indistinct: the necessary news on focus, process press outcomes is missing or the presented in an incoherent or disorganized manner. An understanding of who main, process and outcomes of the investigation is obscured in the presence of inappropriate or irrrelevant information. There are many errors in the use of research specific terminology and conventions. |
| 3-4 | The present about the investigation is clear. Any errors do does
hamper awareness of aforementioned focus, proceed and scores. The report is well structured and clear: the necessary information on focus, process and outcomes is present and featured in a coherent paths. And report is relevant and concise thereby facilitating a finishing understanding of the main, process and outcomes of the investigation. To use of subject specific terminology and protocol is appropriate and correct. Any flaws doing not hamper comprehend. *For example, incorrect/missing tag of graphs, tables, pics; use of units, decimal points. For issues of referencing and quoting refer at the "Academic honesty" section. |
| Criterium | marks available |
marks
|
| Special Engagement | best 2 | 2 marks |
| Investigation | maximum 6 | 6 markings |
| Analysis | utmost 6 | 6 brands |
| Evaluation | maximum 6 | 6 marks |
| Communication | maximum 4 | 4 seals |
|
Amounts =
|
24 marks |
