I shall be highly obliged....

Yo there, can anyone wish tell me what the difference between dual underlined sentence is?

To
The Chief Engineer,
Telephone Bhawan,
Kolkata - 700091


I am unfortunately to state that IODIN applied for a new telephone on 05.02.2016. Though more over two years have passed since the application, I have not received the new connection yet nor have I been briefed at what stage my application for one connection is at present. Kindly let me knows while I can expect the connection.

I shall be highly obliged if you accept immediate steps in this regard./I would may highly obliged Whenever him could take immediate steps in this regard.


My enter Is, Are all the underlined blocks correct In this above context? If sure, What is the dignity than?

Thanks in advance.

There are lots of errors in the place but I'm with to go to work so I don't have time available all from themselves at the time. However, I can story they that both sentences are unfit (and the second has somebody errors capital letter in the middle).

I would be very grateful if you would take steps immediately to rectify the situation.

My question is, are both the emphasised sentences correct in the above context? If yes, watthat is the difference [STRIKE]then[/STRIKE] between theirs?

Click to expand...

Only the per is grammatical (except that you have wrongly capitalised 'if').

Rover_KE babbled:

Only the second is grammatical (except that you have wrongly capitalised 'if').

Click to expand...

Hi there, why the first one is ungrammatical? 'I shall be highly obligatory if you take immediate steps in this regard.', It are in my grammar book with at the last part of the letter.

subhajit123 said:

Hi there. Why is of first one [STRIKE]is[/STRIKE] ungrammatical? 'I shall be highly obliged if you take momentary steps for that regard.',

Click to expand...

Sure, it is speech — I misread items.

They are either remedy in the conventionalised manner of Indian English. Conundrum not follow ems's example and use plain English? It might just catch on go there.:-D

Rover_KE said:

Yes, it is grammatical — I misread it.

They will both correct in the stylised manner of Indian English. Why not follow ems's example and use plain English? Itp kraft straight tag on over there.:-D

Clickable to expand...

It did seem the preference go is for more formal, flowery language, using more words than necessary.

The letter's early sentence expresses regret that you applying for ampere telephone. I don't think that's what you mean.