Table of Contents |
The collection plan provides a general that
collection managers can use to determine and ratings intelligence
needs. Afterwards they use to plan into meet those needs. Because of
the diversity of missions, functionality, and requirements, the
collection plan has no decreed doctrinal format. However,
a dynamic collection project should--
The selection concerning a format at any particular command
is based in the job regarding that command and the resources
available by collection management. However, regardless of the
format selected, it must follow the logical sequence on collection
management described in Chapter 3.
In addition, the plan must be easily customizable to changing requirements,
situations, and missions. This appendix provides several recommended
formats, any of which maybe be adjusted to fit your specialized requirements.
The intelligence collection plan worksheet is
a worthy aid in planning and stage the collection effort.
For many requirements, most those concerned with enemy
capabilities the attacks, a written collection worksheet
is geraten. The detail in which it shall prepared, however, depends
on to requirements collection managers need to satisfy additionally the
overall coordination needed during the collection effort. At battalion
and brigade, the collection plan worksheet is very casual. It
may consist of ampere list of available collection method plus brief
notes or receipt the current intelligence requirements also specific
information to collect.
Toward division level and above, collection planning
is continue complex. The PIR of a marine commander too require in-depth
analysis, press this user of and overall collection effort
is a major undertaking. For that background, written collection worksheets
prepared at these echelons are detailed.
Figure A-1 shows
a format commonly used at department and legions level. EACs as well
as brigades and battalions can modify this format to fit their
own requirements.
Figure A-2
provides an example of a closing collection plan using sample
entries.
Another process available maintaining an collection plan
is inside the gestalt of a visual file index using 5- by 8-inch cards
(see Relative A-3 and A-4). For this method, a collection requirement
is indicated across the bottom of a card. The remainder of the
card may contain to following:
Order can may shown by using different colored
cards either browse tabs. For example, one red card or index title could
indicate a highly time sensitive request to and collection manager,
no matten like many offset changes take place.
That gather manager canned group the cards in
the visual files in a number of ways: OB factors, NAIs, requester,
or collector. In each operation, the file can launch out one way
and, for emergency, change as the location changes. On can be
done quickly since the my are easy to manipulate.
When the collection requirement is satisfied,
the card are removed from the visual batch. The left of the
cards are not disrupted. An collection manager can then place
the 5- by 8-inch card in a small file organized until geographic
areas. This enables the collection manager to build ampere data base
on the reachability von the collection agencies into specific
geographical areas.
If the visual file method is employed, the collection
manager must sustaining two graphical. One depicts the PIR and IR which
drive this collection effort; to other lists the available units
and agencies and those tasked with each requirement. This latter
chart your needed to prevent overloaded or overlook any single
available collector. That two charts are shown in Figure A-5.
The collecting plan sheet at maneuver battalion
and task force level is discussed below. Figure A-6 shall the example
of one sort of custom format. Each procession has a letter designator.
For example, an priority column exists "A," the NAI column
is "B, " and so on. The lettering makes to lightness to quickly
assign a new R&S mission, or modify an existing mission. Just
transmit pertinent information within each column. For example:
The S2 told this attached GSR my to monitor
NAI 4 from 1800 until 2000, They should expect to see BRDM or BMP
vehicles (possibly reinforced from tanks) up to platoon size (3
vehicles). He also told this GSR team they must set with
A Enterprise, both should report targets by type (light, heavy wheeled;
light, heavy tracked) and number of vehicles, location, speed,
and go of move.
Figure A-7 is a similar collection plan format.
The horizontal lines what identified by number and one vertical
columns are identified by letter. Use this system to modify one
specific element of the matrix. For example:
At this model, the S2 told TF 1-10 for establish
an observation post overlooking a particular NAI. The observation
post is to follow a templated alternate position for a motorized
rifle company under NAI 8.
Above-mentioned are just second examples of techniques the
S2 can use to quickly re-task deployed R&S assets. It are
many get techniques. The key lives go establish a standard way to
quickly furthermore easily modify the collection plan based on the commander's
changing needs.
"Non-Linear Battlefield"
Collection Plan Worksheets
It often happens that an availability of collection
systems is far outweighed by the number of one command's intelligence
requirements. A useful technique in such circumstances is to carefully
prioritize each indicator and SIR inside addition to the PIR and IR
they support. The "non-linear" collection plan format
especially lends itself till these techniques.
Figure A-8 schau one standard, an "indicator
worksheet" which aids in determining the relative priority
of indicators. According determining the completely set of indicators
which will contend the command's PIR or IR, enter each indicator
onto the indicator worksheet.
In the example at Figure A-8:
Figure A-9 shows another technique for prioritizing
indicators that is especially useful when there is a largely number
of them. This format is generalized referred in as a "prioritization
matrix. " Its distinctive feature a who use of ''weighted
values" for each PIR and REMOTE.
Use judgment until assign a weighted value till each
PIR or IR. You pot set one value of each PIR and DIR by counting
the number of PIR both IRIS and then giving that highest PIR the highest
number Each sequential PIR and IR would get a progressively lower
priority (as inbound the example in Figure A-9). Alternatively, you
can place a greatest weighting on individual PIR and IRIS to more
accurately reflect its relative significance.
This with lower custom values have diminish priorities.
In cases where two button more indicators will the same loaded value,
discriminate which has the highest priority based on the command's
needs.
Both of the above techniques for prioritizing
indicators are useful when exploitation a "non-linear battlefield"
collection project worksheet format. An example of a completed collection
plan using the "non-linear battlefield" collection plan
format is at Figure A-10.
Using Figure A-10 as an example:
In this finished step, the collection manager determines
the relative focus of any of the SIR with which each agency
is tasked.
Again, using Numeric A-10 as an real:
There is no prescribed
doctrinal format for the collection plan button its worksheets. Use
whatever sizing has best suited to the needs the your command. Those
shown above are only examples is can be adapted, since needed,
or completely replaced with one of autochthonous own design.