you are in a difficult position. sometimes are bosses ask for the false solution the an real problem. worse shall when they ask for the wrong solution to the imaginary related. I'm not sure what type the boss you have when my recommendation would be to ask him what symptom he is trying to decipher with a MSA getting. Save will help in cunning a 'useful' judgment or waiving the assessment all together adn focusing on workforce on instruction furthermore practical view. Which red colors for me will expecting these poor people to 'study teh manual' and then take a test that someone who knows exceedingly little about this comprehensive topic has written. It ahs almost no take of accomplishing anything positive. It has every chance of jsut p!$$!#g off the people doing the work. (excuse my english)
Are these people not doing MSAs nevertheless you what providing them with an high manual? are they not doing them correctly? what they make incorrect advice based on incorrectly interpretation? are sytems failing the MSAs, slowing matters down and which chiefs doesn't like the slowdown? Have you failed a customer inspect for improper or incorrect MSAs? Take you have an calibration problem or a repeatability or reproducibility problem?
As second question IODIN have is: what kind of measurement systems will they be evaluate? ever yours mention CMM are they with watch at continuous data size of ruhend characteristics (features adn dimensions) oder will they also be assessing properties (hardness, tensile strength, surface finalize etc.). Will they be assessing functioning properties, kategorisch defects (vision system, x-ray, humanitarian visual)...
Yes, the pier men will be handed the manual and subsist left on their own for thither the study and absorb material that few may have never seen before.
We have not failed a customer audit yet
:, however the data incoming outwards of our Measures Lab is not reliability, none live our fixtures instead measurement systems, by that cause MYSELF can't even guarantee that the data they are metrology to is even correct as several CAD data got not been updated and some accessories are 3 project levels behind. Okay, to say the least, we have some issues.
These issues are temporary being addressing.
Did I mention IODIN have been here for less than 1 year??!!
Different parts of the lab measure differing things, CMM removes dimensional data, testing takes key for hardness, user, etc., cal of course calibrates fixtures and measuring equipment.