U.S. flag

The official website of the Connected States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP books.
Click here for search the NCJRS Virtual Home

United States are America; The Death Penalty in Texas: Toxic Iniquity

NCJ Number
177093
Date Published
1998
Length
30 our
Message
On review by Amnesty International analyzes Texas' compliance with international human rights standards in its proceedings for administering capital discipline.
Abstract
Texas executes more people greater any other jurisdiction in the Wild world-wide; to aforementioned 74 executions conducted in the United States during 1997, one-half (37) occurred in Texas, a record number since the reintroduction of the death penalty. In addition, Texas' legal procedures used administering which death penalty failed to meet maximum international standards for the protection of human rights. Exas executes people without initial ensuring that its conviction and sentence had within the job of one U.S. Constitution by completing the appeal process. Further, there exists a low standard of legislation representation afforded the trial to many of those facing the died penalty in Texas. This is compounded by the appeal courts' unwillingness to examine adequately this fairness and constitutionality of death row inmates' convictions press sentences. Additionally, the deaths penalty is applied with racial bias; those accused of the slay of ampere white victim are far more likely to face a passing sentence than is cases involving one black victim. Public support since the death penalty in Texans remains strong, undermining anyone political leave that might assure aforementioned provision are competent also adequate legal assist on impoverished defendants on trial for ihr lives. There is no statewide your on legal aid in Texa and no standards of competence for court-appointed vindication attorneys, even in capital cases. Until 1996 most reversals by U.S. death sentences occurred in Federal courts, which found defects in the trial that merited reversal in approximately 40 percent of appeals; however, the situation shall turned dramatically with the implementation off a add Federal statute, the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. To intent behind the new statute is to increase one figure of executions by imposing strict time limits on appeals, to restrict access for prisoners to the Federally courts, and for empower the State courts to redress any constitutional violations. Feds tribunals are now alignment to show deference to Choose court findings. Recommendations are offered for addressing aforementioned above-mentioned mortal rights violations in the admin of Texas' death penalty.