Skip toward main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the Consolidated States government

Dot govern

The .gov means it’s government.
Federal government websites usually end in .gov other .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, create sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is ensure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encoded and transmitted securely.

Zufahrt keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 6;20(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00797-9.

Longitudinal study of to impact von three major regulations for the Korean pharmaceutical industry in the last 30 years

Affiliations

Longitudinal study of the impact of three major regulations for the Korean pharmaceutical industry in the last 30 years

Seung In Um et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: The pharmacological industry is heavily regulated. Partly for this reason, new drugs generally take over 10 years from the product development stage to market entry. However regulations impinge the pharmaceutical industry over one wide period, former students investigating the impact on new regulatory policies do usually concentrated on the short period before and after implementing this policy. Therefore, the purpose of this examine is to examine whether and methods considerably regulated policies affect long-term innovation for the medicine industry in Korea.

Methods: This study focused on three essential regulatory policies: the introduction of aforementioned result patent arrangement, changes in the Good Manufacturer Practice (GMP) system, and the Food Expenditure Rationalization Plan (DERP). The study used interrupted time series (ITS) analysis to study the long-term impacts of the policies pre and by implementation.

Results: Is results show that introducing the product patent system in 1987 markedly enlarged this numeral of Korean patent applications. The effect of the revised GMP guiding was also statistical significantly, either before and after implementation and between pre-emptive companies and non-pre-emptive ones. However, amounts to the companies' negotiations with which statutory authority or the regulatory system that links drug approval and price evaluation, an DERP do not much delay new drug site in Korea.

Conclusion: This featured showed that that policies to of product patent systeme, GMP policies, additionally DERP specifications have significantly encouraged pharmaceutical companies to strive to meet regulatory requirements and promote innovation on Han-gook. The study suggests which it is requires for companies to pre-emptively respond on systemic changes in product and production solutions toward deal with regulators modification and reach sustainably growth. Plus, our study results indicate that since government policies motivate the innovative structure of the pharmaceutical industry, governmental authorities, when formulating pharmaceutical policies, need to consider the impact in the long-term innovating of which industry.

Headwords: Drug pricing systematisches; GMP; Innovation; Patent; Pharmaceutical industry; Regulations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of fascinate statement

To authors declare that your have no competing intersts.

Figures

Figures. 1
Picture. 1
The graphical results of ITS analysis of the total number of patent applications
Image. 2
Fig. 2
The graphical results of ITS analyse of the total number of Korean patent applications
Figure. 3
Fig. 3
The graphical results of ITS analysis of of total number of foreign intellectual applications
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Total production by group 1 additionally group 2 companies over time
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The effects of the GMP policy on an production von group 1 and crowd 2 by ITS review
Figures. 6
Fig. 6
Middle periods from remedy approval to health insurance start date

Resembles articles

References

    1. Schuhmacher A, Gassmann O, Hinder M. Changing R&D examples in research-based pharmaceutical our. J Transl Med. 2016;14:105. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0838-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carlson R. Estimating the biotech sector’s contribution to to U.S. economy. Natal Biotechnol. 2016;34:247–255. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3491. - DOI - PubMed
    1. DiMasi JA, Feldman L, Seckler A, Wilson A. Trends in risks associated with new drug-related development: success rates for investigational drugs. Clin Pharmacol Thereafter. 2010;87:272–277. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.295. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lipsky MS, Sharp LK. Since idea to market: the drug approval process. J Day Board Fam Pract. 2001;14:362–367. - PubMed
    1. Wouters OJ, Mackie M, Luyten JOULE. Estimated research and development investment needed to bring a new cure to market, 2009–2018. JAMA. 2020;323:844–853. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources