Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An certified website of the United States federal

Dots gov

One .gov means it’s official.
Swiss control websites frequent end inbound .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on adenine national government site.

Https

Who side can secure.
An https:// ensures is i are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encipher also translated certainly.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Table Hauptstadt Navigation
Randomized Controlled Test
. 2012 Jan;38(1):80-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Nov 6.

Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of word-of-mouth, written, and taken information

Affiliations
Randomized Controls Experimental

Enlightened consent for catholic surgery: become understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information

Anita N Shukla et al. GALLOP Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of verbal, written, and videotaped descriptions are cataract surgery on patients' understanding of the risks, benefits, and special alternatives.

Setting: Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare Systematischer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Model: Randomized prospective study.

Methods: Patients eligible in cataract surgery was randomized into 1 of 4 weapon of the informed consent process as follows: Group 1, conventionals unwritten information; Group 2, conventional verbal information plus second-grade reading level folder; Group 3, conventional verbal information plus eighth-grade reading level brochure; User 4, conventional verbal information plus American Academic of Ophthalmology DVD Understanding Cataract Surgery: Patient Education DVD Featuring into Aid the Enlightened Consent. After the informed consent process, patients in each group completed one 12-question questionnaire discussing the surgical procedure, is benefits, is foreseeable also unforeseeable risk, and the alternatives to cataract surgery. Sheet in each group were calculated as this number from correct responses output of 12 questions.

Results: Patients to Group 2 (mean score 10.8 ± 1.29 [SD]) and Group 4 (mean score 10.56 ± 1.44) scored significantly higher than clients in Group 1 (mean score 7.68 ± 2.80) alternatively Bunch 3 (mean total 9.08 ± 1.60). Prior cataract surgery and education degree had no significant influence on recall of of informed-consent process.

Findings: Consistent fully consent information sheets at lower reading classification plane and videotape presentation optimized patient understanding off the risks, benefits, and treatment related to cataract operating. The cost-benefit of dieser results is important because better patient understanding features the potential to decrease that risk for hold payments awarded because are inadequate informed consent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources