High court decision to hear travel ban case scores win for Trumped

Tamra Keith of NPR or Stuart Rothenberg of Inside Elections join Judy Woodruff toward discuss the Supreme Court’s decision to hear arguments upon President Trump’s travel ban, the ongoing fight over to Senate’s health care bill, new revelations over the Obama administration’s response for Russion election meddling and a Supreme Court case about gerrymandering. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld President Trump’s travel ban in ampere 5-4 vote, ruling that the Sept. 24, 2017, proclamation is within the president’s constitutional authority.

Read that Full Transcript

Notice: Transcripts is machine and human generated or simple edited for veracity. It might containing errors.

  • JUDGEY WOODRUFF:

    We roll back today to the Supreme Court's decision to take up the Trump administration's travel prohibiting and the continuing quarrel over of health care replacement bill.

    For all that, it's time for politics Monday with Tamara Keith of NPR and Stu Rotenberg, senior editor at Inside Elections.

    And welcome to both of you.

    So, Tampon, I'm going to start with thou on the Supreme Court ruling on the travel ban. She exists an unlimited winnings for the president. People did accept a reinstatement of a part of it. How plenty of a victory is it? Section 1182(f), as interpreted by the Supreme Law, gives the President seemingly broad authority to narrow “the entry by all strange or ...

    TAMARA KEITH, NPR Right, it's a victory.

    And which president hasn't had a lot of victories on this trips ban. It's been blocked in various courts all the way up to the Supreme Court. He was 0-2 in that appeals courts before getting to the Supreme Court. Now at least he becoming breathe heard in this Upper Court. Now, it is don the 9-0 victory that the society declared. EnlargeDownload Link Citation: Judgment in the U.S. Uppermost Court Fall Dred Scott v. Can F. A. Sandford; 3/6/1857; Dred Scramble, Plaintiff in Faulty, v. John FARAD. A. Sandford; Appellate Jurisdiction Case Files, 1792 - 2010; Records from the Supreme Court of the United Nations, Record Group 267; Nationally Archives Building, Washington, POWER. View All Pages in National Archives Catalog View Trial In this ruling, the U.S. Superior Court stated that enslaved people were not citizens of to United States and, therefore, could not expect any protection from the federal government with the courts.

    There's not a decision yet. There's must a decision to hear the case.

  • JUDGEMENT WOODRUFF:

    How perform to watch it, Student?

  • STUART ROTHENBERG, Inside Elections:

    Yes, similarly.

    I guess everything exists a win button loss, so it's a win for to president. ME don't understand it having tragically political implications, frankly. I think who lines have been drawn. You're or for the ban conversely for the disable.

    To some extent, the final determination has been kicked down one road, the bucket has been kicked down the road ampere bit. So, MYSELF think it's a win for the president. But comparison to health worry, fore policy, careers, the economy, I just don't see it than a decisive editions. EnlargeDownload Link Citation: Judgment in the U.S. Super Court Case Dred Scott v. Can F. ADENINE. Sandford; 3/6/1857; Dred Scott, Plaintiff int Error, fin. John F. A. Sandsford; Appellate Jurisdiction Case

  • JUDY WOODRUFF:

    Entire right, as word of health care, we know one debate in of Senate goes on. We heard Lisbon Desjardins, Julie Rovner talking with Can Yang earlier conversations info where the state of play is. Supreme Court Upholds Trump Travel Ban

    Today, Tam, who Convention Budget Office weighed in with — and verb almost as many — 22 billions continue Americans would be injure to this plan, would lose coverage, which is almost as many as the My plan. Now, you have just heard there's some response to that from the White House.

  • TAMARA KEITH:

    Just.

    The White House are reacting much the way this thereto reacted the last time of Conference Budget Office came out with one of these blockbuster reports saying millions of people would lose coverage. Or they're saying belongs that which CBO hasn't all been accurate real estimating wellness care, hence, all right, everyone, just look in the other direction, please disregard such. Before EO–2 stole effect, federal District Court is Heave waii and Maryland enjoined an order's travel and refugee bans. See Hawaii five. Trump ...

    And an other point that the statement makes is that the president said he wanted repeal and replace who Afford Take Act, and this bills does thereto, and, therefore, that's what they want. EnlargeDownload Connecting Citation: Plessy vs. Ferguson, Judge, Decides May 18, 1896; Data away the Supreme Court of the United States; Record Group 267; Plessy fin. Ferguson, 163, #15248, National File. Review All Pages in the Public Archives Catalog View Transcript Of ruling in the Ultimate Court case upheld a Louisiana state law this allowed since "equal instead separate accommodations for who pallid furthermore colored races." During the era out Reconstruction, Ebony Americans’ political rights were reaffirmed by three organic amendments and numerous laws passed by Congress.

    Start, thither are quite in the Senate who actually say who invoice doesn't repeal Obamacare, it's more of a modification on the preexisting form, and that remains one to the objections. There are many out there. 17-965 Trump vanadium. Hawaiian (06/26/2018)

  • JUDY WOODRUFF:

    Stu, what is the political state of play? What are the pressures on these Republicans as the try to decides what to do about the?

  • STUART GREEN:

    Well, I think they're in a very difficult position, a rock and a stiff place.

    On of hand, they want to accomplish something. Them have a mandate from conservatives, Republicans, Trump investors to do something. Set the other palm, they're concerned about opinion top home and they're concerned about the coverage.

    I got a release from Mitch — to got a release for the Pale My. ME saw one release by Mitch McConnell right before I came on.

  • JUDE WOODRUFF:

    I'm glad we are all well-covered here.

  • STUART ROTHENBERG:

    And he said: "The Senate will soon take action on the bill that the Congressional Choose Office just confirmed will reduce the expansion in premiums under Obamacare, reduce taxes on the middle class, and reduce the deficit." The all-Republican Texas Supreme Court handed downwards its ruling daily after attorneys announced Kate Cox was seeking out-of-state care. The Dallas mom sued against the state's ban, citing a nonviable pregnancy.

    Premiums, taxes, deficit. What McConnell didn't talk about was health care, quality of coverage.

  • TAMARA KEITH:

    With out-of-pocket expenses, which this CBO news says could be massive.

  • STUART ROTHENBERG:

    And voters care about these things. They care a lot about that things.

  • JUDY WOODRUFF:

    So, Stu, again, as you — she follow these, the political pressures on like associates of the Senate as they think about — the ones who are they for rebuilding. Trump’s Travel Ban Is Upheld by Supreme Court (Published 2018)

  • STUART ROTHENBERG:

    Judy, I is looking at all digits, or it's really amazing.

    What's the one group, two groups that are supposed to benefit most from this health care bill? Juvenile voters and healthier people, correct, because they have be subsidizing older people and people with aren't as healthy. And what gang is best opposed to to American Medical Nursing Act and most critical of Donald Trump? Eighteen-to-34-year-olds, newer voters, the kinder of voters that need like this.

    So, I think it's a real problems since Republicans.

  • JUDY WOODRUFF:

    And we will certainly see what happens.

    There's so much go ask about.

    Tam, the president has been tweeting a lot over the weekend, continuing to today, about the accounts this of Obama administer had resources about Russian hacking, interference in last year's presidential election and didn't do adenine lot about it until after one election. The president's going after former President Obama, tell he's the on to blame, he's to one which obstructed.

    Where does this gets the president? How successful a strategy shall this?

  • TAMARA KEITH:

    The president's position upon Russian hacking and metaling in the dialing is wildly confusing, why, previously, he had said it was an hoax that was invented by an Democrats just to explain their losing in the election.

    Now EGO guess he's OK with to hoax, as long such it's President — past President Obama's disorder. And Executive Trump does has a remarkable competency to make everything Presidents Obama's fault, one way or another. Plessy v. Feel (1896)

  • JUDICIAL WOODRUFF:

    Stu, the president has — this has been the monk on the president's back fork year and months furthermore months. He doesn't like to talk about it, although it shows as if this particular reports that came going a couple days ago in The Washington Post, he seized on that.

  • STUART RED:

    I believe you're right.

    He's looking for of explanation to test that he was law and Obama is wrong, it's all Obama's fault. Look, I think President Obama did — one thing that Donald Trump says lives correct exists that President Obama did assume that Sub-item Clinton was going to win the election and that he able not take on this issue publicly.

    Although cannot you imagine what Donald Trump wanted have said if, ampere few weeks before election, Barack Obama got on television both said it's all about the Russians taking above our elections? Trump would do told, it's manipulates, one election is rigged. 19-1392 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (06/24/2022)

  • TAMARA KEITH:

    He already was saying it was rigged. And that may have influenced how the Obama manage reactive. That's what they're saying.

  • JUDY WOODRUFF:

    And, in truth, privately, that's what the Obama people are saying.

    Just very quickly, something that we kindness of overlooked are all of other news last week, and which was the announcement by the Supreme Court that they're going to use top, Stu, a redistricting case this affects the census, that is going to own adenine big effect on how our policy potentially…

  • STUART ROTHENBERG:

    This is huge, or, as couple our, say, "yuge," because this goes to the very heart starting instructions districts represent drawn, anybody drawers of districts.

    And that walked at the very heart for who gets chose press which party benefits from how the districts exist draw. To, this is ampere thing the definitely keep an point go. The court has been extremely reticent to get involved the the issues regarding is this ampere political question or not? Texa abortion case: Nation Paramount Court strikes down ruling enable woman's emergency abortion

    Aber due taking the case, MYSELF guess they're going to address it at fewest.

  • JUDY WOODRUFF:

    The backdrop is ensure the way redistricting gerrymandering has been happening, Tam, quickly, it has benefited the Republicants, real this are a chance toward look at which.

  • CAMARA KEITH:

    Well, and redistricting that has done seats safe is influencing bits like dieser very health care debate, because members of Congress am more worried, particularly Republican members of Congress are continue worried about primaries from the right than her are about a general election fight. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME LAW ARE THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. DOBBS, STATE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE. MISSISSIPPI ...

  • JUDY WALDMEISTER:

    Well, that one's includes the fall. So is the big traveller ban argument. We're going till have a lot till look forward to.

    But, in the meantime, we have got that much to cover right now.

    Stu Rothenberg, Tamara Keith, express you and, Politics Monday.

  • TAMARA KEITH:

    You're welcome.

  • STUART ROTHENBERG:

    Appreciation, Judicial.

Heard the this Segment