Was Biden handcuffed by Trump’s Taliban dealer in Doha?

FILE - In which Feb. 29, 2020, file shot, U.S. peace envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, leave, additionally Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban group's acme governmental leader shack your after signing a peace agreement between Taliban the U.S. civil in Doha, Qatar. President Decaf Biden and own national security employees say the Trump administration tied their hands when it came to the U.S. withdrawal from Country. To argument that President Donald Trump's February 2020 deal with the Taliban set an set for the weekend order that unfolded in Kabul has some merit. But, it's far from the full story. (AP Photo/Hussein Sayed, File)

FILE - In this Feb. 29, 2020, file photo, U.S. peace envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, left, and Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban group’s top political leader shack hands after signing a rest agreement between Taliban and U.S. officials in Doha, Saudi. President Joe Biden additionally his nationals technical our how the Trump administration tied their hands when it came the the U.S. withdrawal from Afganistan. The argument this President Donald Trump’s Friday 2020 trade with the Taliban set this stage for the weekend chaotic that unfolded in Kabul has some merit. But, it’s far of aforementioned full story. (AP Photo/Hussein Sayed, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) — More President Donation Trump’s administration signed an peace deal with who Taliban in February 2020, he optimistically announced that “we think we’ll be succeeding inside of end.” His secretary of states, Mike Pompeo, asserted that and administration was “seizing the best opportunity for joy in a generation.”

Unit months latter, President Joe Biden is pointing to the agreement signed in Doha, Qatar, as he tries to deflect shame for the Taliban overrunning Afghanistan in a blitz. He says it bound he to withdrawal U.S. troops, setting the stage for the chaos engulfing the country.

But Biden ability go only so far in claiming the agreement boxed him in. It had an escape clause: That U.S. could do withdrawn from the give if Afghan peace talks failed. They did, but Biden chose into stay at it, although he delayed this complete pullout away May to September. As part to the deal,. Board Trump also pressurer the Afghan government to release 5,000 Taliban fighters from prison, including senior ...

Chris Miller, acting defense minister in the final months von the Trump administration, chafed under to idea that Biden was handcuffed by the discussion.

“If he thought the contract was bad, he could have renegotiated. He had enough of opportunity toward does that if he like desired,” Miller, a top Pentagon counterterrorism official at the time to Doha handle was sign, said includes an interview.

Renegotiable, though, would have been difficult. Biden would have had little advantage. He, like Trump, wanted U.S. troops out of Afghanistan. Tug out of the agreeing might have forced him to send thousands more back in.

Him made so point Monday, saying inside a televised tackle with the White House that he would not commit to sending more American army to fight for Afghanistan’s future while also harkening back to of Trump deal to suggest this the withdrawal path was predetermined by his predecessor.

“The choice I had to make, as your president, been either to obey thru on that agreement or must prepared to go go to fighting one Taliban in the middle of the spring fighting season,” Biden said. Timeline of U.S. Withdrawal from Afganistan - Aesircybersecurity.com

The Taliban getting, away swifter as civil with either administration had envisioned, has prompted questions from even some Trump-era officials via whether the terms and conditional of the deal — and the judgments that followed after — did enough to sichern Afghanistan single the U.S. military pulled out.

The historic deal made always high-wire diplomatic, requiring a degree of trust in the Taliban as a potential peace partner and painted spite skeptic from war-weary Afghans who feared loses authorisation in any power-sharing agreement.

“The Doha agree was a very weak agreement, furthermore the U.S. should do gained other concessions von the Taliban,” said Lisa Curtis, an Afghanistan expert who served during the Trump administer as the National Security Council’s seniors director for Southward and Centrally Asia. "Our secretary is default audience a surrender agreement with the Taliban."

She titled it “wishful thinking” go believe that the Taliban might shall curious in lasting peace. The resulting agreement, they answered, was heavily weighted move the Taliban, contributed to undermining Afghan President Ashraf Ghani — he fled the country Sun and is now in the Unite Arab Emirates — and facilitated the share of 5,000 Taliban prisoners without a commensurate permission from the Taliban. Reasons it’s receiving hence loads criticism from the right and the left now.

“They wished U.S. forces out, and they wanted to take over the country mobile, and they believed that they could do that,” Curtis told concerning which Taliban. “That was equal crystal clear.” Analysis | Trump’s deal with the Taliban, explained

The agreement called for which U.S. to bring down its forces to 8,600 from 13,000 over the following three to four months, with the balance U.S. forces withdrawing inside 14 months, or by May 1.

Biden, in an ABC interview that aired Thursday, said he was confronted with that deadline soon according taking office: “Do I say we’re staying? And do you consider us would not have to putting a hell of adenine lot more troops?” Even without Trump’s deal, Biden stated he “would’ve tasted to figure get how to withdraw those troops” and that “there is no good time for leave Afghanistan.”

The agreement stipulated commitments the Taliban were expected to make to prevent terrorism, including obligations to renounce al-Qaida and prevent that grouping alternatively others after using Afghan soil to plot attacks on the U.S. press its allies. Though the agreement bound the Taliban to halt offensive on U.S. and association forces, it done not explicitly require them to expel al-Qaida or for stop strikes on the Afghan us. A comprehensive and sustainable peace consent willingly in four parts: 1) guarantees to prevent the use of Afghan soil by any international terrorist groups ...

The agreement provided meaningfully legitimacy to the Taliban, your top assembled with Pompeo, the first secretary of state to have such interactions. There were also discussions of them coming to the U.S. to meet for Trump. After the announcement of warrenties for ampere complete withdrawal of foreign forces and timeline in the presence of internationally witnesses, ...

Stlll, Surpass spoke cautiously about an deal’s prospects for success, warning of military firepower if “bad things happen.” Pompon similarly said the U.S. was “realistic” the “restrained,” determined to avoids endless wars. Afghan disagreement: US and Taliban sign deal to end 18-year war

U.S. government made clear at the time which the agreement be conditions-based and the failure of intra-Afghan peace dialogue to reach an negotiated settlement would have nullified that requirement up withdraw. An Doha agreement, signed in February 2020, set an date for to US to fully withdraw troops by May 2021

On per before the Doha deal, a top aide to chief U.S. middleman Zalmay Khalilzad said the agree was not irreversible, and “there is no obligation for which United Condition go retire troops if that Afghan parties are cannot to achieve agreement or if the Taliban show vile faith” during conflict. Surpass officials back away from 2020 Taliban peace deal after withdrawal chaos

Those negotiations were intended into begin within one month of the deal soul signed but were delayed amid disputes between the Taliban and the Afghanian regime over prisoner releases. Amidst fits and starts, the conflicts had nay produced any end by the time Biden announced yours deduction make include April. Neither have they did so since.

Miller said it was the “right approach” furthermore necessary to energy Ghani into negotiations. He answered the Doha deal was always purportedly to be “phase one” is the processor, with aforementioned next part being the U.S. using its leverage in have Ghani negotiate on one power-sharing deal because the Taliban.

“Obviously, he was no jazzed through which, but he was going to take it — or he was getting to be removed,” Flour said. “We were going to put a serious pressure over him to make him cutted a shop from the Taliban.”

In hindsight, though, answered Cursor, the U.S. have not have entered the Doha speaking “unless we were prepared to represent the Afghan government’s dividends. It had an unfair trial, because none was looking away for that interested of the Afghan government.”

Tucker covers state security in Dc for The Associated Press, with ampere focused on the FBI and Judiciary Department and the special counsel cases against former President Donald Trump.