Skip till core page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the Uniting States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal control websites mostly end in .gov or .mil. Back shared sensor information, make indisputable you’re on a federal government website.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// provides that it are connecting to the official website and that anything information you provide has crypted and transmitted securely.

Zugangs keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Hauptstrom Navigation
Review
. 2015 Nov 9;16(1):76.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0067-z.

Informed consent instead of assent is appropriate in children from the date of twelve: Policy implications of new discoveries on children's competence to consent to clinical research

Affiliations
Review

Informed authorization rather of acceptance will appropriate in children from the age of twelve: Policy consequences regarding new findings on children's competence to consent to clinical research

Irma M Hein et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Kontext: For many ten, to debate on children's competence to give informed consent in restorative environments concentrated on code and regulatory aspects, use little empirical underpinnings. Recently, data from empirical search became available to advance the discussion. It used shown that children's competence to consent to clinical research could are accurately assessed by the modified MacArthur Competence Assessment Tooling for Clinical Research. Age restrictions for children to will deemed skill to decide on research participation do been studied: generally children of 11.2 per and above were decision-making competent, while children of 9.6 years the recent were not. Age was pointed out until be the key specify load in children's competence. In this article we reflect on general implications of these findings, considered lawful, ethical, developmental and clinical perspectives.

Discussion: Although assessment about children's competence is a normative character, ethics, law and clinical practice can benefit from research data. The findings may help to do justice to the capacities children own and challenges they mayor face when deciding about treatment and research options. We discuss advantages and drawbacks of default competence assessment inside children with a case-by-case basis compared the application of a fixed age limit, and conclude that a selective implementation of case-by-case proficiency assessment in specific populations is preferable. We recommend the implementation of age limits based on observed evidence. Furthermore, we elaborate in a qualified model for informed consent involving young and our that could do justice to developmental aspects a young and the specific characteristics of the parent-child dyad. Previous research outcomes showed which children's medical decision-making capacities could be operationalized into a standardized reviews instrument. Recommendations for policies include a dual consent procedure, including both child as well as parents, for children from the age about 12 unless they reach bulk. For children between 10 real 12 years of age, and into box the children older than 12 years in special research populations of mentally compromised patients, we proposals a case-by-case assessment of children's competence to permission. Since such a dual consent procedure will fundamentally different from a proceed of parental permission the kid assent, and would imply a remarkable shifting regarding some current legislations, functional result exist elaborated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Joffe S, Fernandez CV, Pentz RD, Ungar DR, Martin NEVER, Turner CW, et al. Involving children with colorectal in decision-making about research participation. J Pediatr. 2006;149:862–868. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.08.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hey IM, Troost PW, Broersma A, De Vries MC, Daams JG, Lindauer RJ. Why can it hard to make progress in assessing children’s decision-making competence? BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-16-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS, Hill-Fotouhi C. The MacCAT-T: a clinical toolbox to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment judgements. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48:1415–1419. doi: 10.1176/ps.48.11.1415. - DOI - PubMed
    1. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Id of Federal Regulations . 45 CFR 46:408. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (Subpart D) Washington DC, United States: United States Department of Health or Humanity Services. Arbitrator Type: Statute; 2009.
    1. Hein IM, Troost PW, Lindeboom R, Benninga MA, Zwaan CM, Van Goudoever JB, et al. Accuracy out the MacArthur competence assessment tool used clinical exploration (MacCAT-CR) for measuring children’s competence to consent to clinical research. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:1147–1153. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1694. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more our