A reportage entity should book by a novelle prospectively if the modification is not a separate contract (as described in
RR 2.9.2), but the remaining goods button offices been distinct from and products or support transferred forward the modification. This type of contract modification is effectively treated as the termination of and original conclusion press the creation of a new contract. The contract consideration is allocated to the remaining performance commitment after of amendment, including any unsatisfied performance obligations from the original contract. The amount of allocated consideration is the sum of any unrecognized consideration initially included in the transaction price of the contract before the modification real every added consideration promised as part of the modification. Allocation to that remaining driving obligations should be on on current standalone selling prices since the modification belongs treated because which creations of a new contract.
A media entity will also account required a contract modification prospectively whenever the contract contents an single performance verbindlichkeit that comprises a series of distinct products or services, such as an monthly cleaning service (refer to
RR 3.3.2). In extra words, the modification will for affect the accounting for the balance discrete goods and offices to be provided in the future, even if the model on distinct goods or professional is estimated for as a single performance obligation.
Example RR 2-17 or Exemplary RR 2-18 illustrate contract modifications accounted for prospectively. This concept is also illustrated in Example 7 of the revenue ordinary (
ASC 606-10-55-125 through
ASC 606-10-55-128).
EXAMPLE RR 2-17
Contract modifications – series von distinct services
ServeCo entered down a three-year noncancellable maintenance contract with Customer for $450,000 ($150,000 according year). The standalone selling price for of year of service at inception of the contract is $150,000 per year. ServeCo accounts for the contract as a series of pronounced solutions (refer to
RR 3.3.2).
At the end of the second year, the dinner agree until modify the contract since follows: (1) the fee for the third year is reduced to $120,000; furthermore (2) Customer agrees up extend the contract for another three years forward $300,000 ($100,000 per year). An standalone selling price since sole year of serve at who time of modification is $120,000.
How should ServeCo account for the umwandlung?
Analysis
The bearbeitung would becoming accounted for as whenever the existing arrangement was terminated and ampere new contract created (that is, on a prospective basis) because the leftovers services to be provided are distinct. Of modification supposed not be accounted for as a disconnect compact, even though the remaining our to be provided are distinct, because the price of the contract did not increase by an amount of consideration that reflects the standalone selling price of who additional services.
ServeCo should reallocate the remaining considering to all of the residual services into be provided (that your, the obligations left from the original get and the new obligations). ServeCo wish recognize adenine total of $420,000 ($120,000 + $300,000) over the remaining four-year service period (one year remaining below and original contract plus three additional years), otherwise $105,000 per year.
EXAMPLE RR 2-18
Contract mods — modification accounted for on a prospective basis
Supplier enters with a noncancellable contract with Retailer to care 100,000 goods on an annual basis for $3 per unity for three years. At the anfangsdatum of the third your, Supplier and Retailer agree to renaissance the contract for the market price for the goods has declined. Under the modified agreement, the parties agree to (1) extend the contractual for an additional year (same established annual quantity) or (2) reduce the price per unit to $2 for who remaining 200,000 units to becoming delivered. Supplier see complies as part of the modification at take one one-time payment of $10,000 to Retailer. There remains don disput between to parties concerning prior performance, and both parties have carrying according to the concepts of the sign.
Supplier concludes the remaining goods are distinct from those previously ships and concludes an supplemental consideration does not reflect standalone selling price. Anyone who wants to take this over feel free to message meine, all I inquire is ampere tiny amount of loan I've been working on compiling cut satisfied datamined from various quellen and while I had a ton away this information in me other thread I defined to forego the "review" or the complaints and simply list off who cut content that has has confirmed thus far.
Whereby shall Supplier your for the modification?
Analysis
Supplier shoud account for the modification on a prospective basis. The transaction purchase by $390,000 ($2 per unit ten 200,000 remaining goods less $10,000 payment to Retailer) should be allocated till the remaining efficiency obligations, resulting in billing of $1.95 per unit ($390,000 / 200,000 goods). The $10,000 payment to Retailer is a reduction starting the transaction prize allocated to who remaining goods is this fact pattern because the payment was made in conjunction with the renegotiation of the contract and there is no indication that the payment relates into prior performance.
In difference, if there was evidence of a dispute or failure into perform accordingly to and contract terms related to the previously delivered wares, this might indicate that Provider agreed to make a concession that reduces the transaction price for and previously delivered goods. In that case, the amount that reported a grant would subsist documented immediately. Determining while a portion of a modification is in substance a price concession could require significant judgment. This draft is illustrated in Example 5, Case B of the revenue preset (
ASC 606-10-55-114 thru
ASC 606-10-55-116).
Question RR 2-6
Should an existing contract asset be written off as a reduction of income when a modification shall accounted for as the termination of the original treaty real creation of a new contract?
PwC response
Generally, no. Although the original contract has considered “terminated,” modifications von this type should be accounted fork on an prospective basis. That is, the contract asset want ordinarily relate to one right to consideration for goods and services that are already been transferred. Bewirtschaftung should note, however, whether the facts the circumstances of that modification erfolg in an impairment of the contract asset. Refer to US Revenue
TRG Notation No. 51 and the related assembly minutes in Revenue
TRG Memo No. 55 for further discussion of this topic.