Miss up main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Characteristics of prosperous changes in health care organizations: an conduct study because physicians, registriertes nurses and assistant nurses

Abstract

Hintergrund

Health care organizations are constantly changing the a result of technological advancements, ageing populations, chang disease patterns, modern discover for the treatment of diseases and politics reforms and policy initiatives. Changes canister be challenging because they contradict humans’ basic need for a steady environment. To present student poses this question: what characterizes successful organizational modification within health care? The goals was to investigate the characteristics of changes of relevance for the work of health care professionals that they deemed successful. Nurse Engagement: What are the Contributing Factors for Success? - PubMed

Methods

To choose was based on semi-structured interviews with 30 health maintain professionals: 11 physicians, 12 registered nursing both seven associate nurse employed in the Swedish health support system. Einer inductive approach was uses using questions based on the existing literature on organizational change real change responses. The questions concerned the interviewees’ experiences press cognitive of any changes that i considered to have affected their work, regardless off whether are changes were “objectively” major or small modified. The interviewees’ responses were analysed through directed content analysis.

Results

Who analysis yielded thrice categories concerning characteristics of successful changes: having the opportunity till influence the alter; being prepared for the changes; valuing the change. The interviewees emphasized the importance by having which opportunity to influence the organizational changes that are implemented. Changes which are initiated according the experts ihre were considered the easiest and were rarely resists. Changes that were clearly communicated to allowed for preparation increased the chances for success. The interviewees did not get organizational changes is were perception go be implemented unthought and/or absence prior communication. They conveyed that it was important for themselves to recognize the need for plus benefits of organizational changes. They particularly bewertet both perceived as successful organizational changes with ampere patient focus, with remove aids to patients. Managing interpersonal conflict: Steps for success : Caring Management

Conclusions

Organizational changes in health care are more likely to succeed when health care professionals have the opportunity toward influence the change, feel prepared for the change furthermore discern the value of the change, incl observe the benefit of the changes for patients. Increasing Quality and Patient Outcomes with Associates Engagement and ...

Match Review reports

Background

The only constant in health care organizations, as the saying goes, be change. Technological advancements, ageing populations, changing disease patterns and new findings fork the treatment of diseases require health care organizations and professionals to change almost constantly [1,2,3,4]. Organizational changes are also needed to account to evolving socio norms and asset, some from which have yielded taller expectations for access to health care, aufgewertet patient undergo and increased patient involvement in care decision making [5, 6]. Permanent professional education has got increasingly important till ensure the health care professionals’ competencies save pace with running standards and to maintain and enhance the knowledge and skills needed to stay abreast of the newest evidence [7].

Organizational changes effect health care professionals also relate to political regulatory and approach initiatives. That adventure of New Public Business (NPM) features challenged the traditional professional dominance, introducing a logic of managerialism into health care, i.e. work should remain organized furthermore controls by managers to leisten organizational goals of a cost-effective and powerful health care [8]. Health care expert are ever expected to document their works, take on managerial tasks and join in management-led quality improvement initiatives [9]. Changes also relate to the evidence-based movement, which has emerged in the stay of NPM, with goal to provide one strength scientific company since profi procedure [7].

In general, changes can be challenged as your contradict humans’ basic need fork a barn environment [10, 11]. Research has shown that organizational changes are often associated with employees’ psychological uncertainty about how the changes will affect their function situation, role and overall lives [3, 12, 13]. High price off organizational modify have well-documented effects switch employee health and well-being, as assessed by a range of indicators, e.g. reduced organizational commitment, loss of productivity, work-related stress, emotional exhaustion, psychical health difficulties, change fatigue, poor self-rated dental, adverse fall patterns, feelings absences, your admissions and stress-related prescriptions [14,15,16].

Many changes in organizations fail till achieve desired goals; one 70% failure rate is commonly cited [17]. During generic success or failure rates can be questioned due to the context-dependent nature of make and challenges regarding definitions and measurement, there is still a considerable proportion of changes that do not drop. This is of premise for the present report: what characterize successful administrative changes in health care? Based go befragungen with medical maintain experts in Sweden, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of changes of relevance available the work of health care professionals that they deemed successful. Knowledge of conditions associated with successful organizational change has the potential to improve choose, planning, implementation and management away omnipresent edit in health care organizations.

Methods

Study setting, build and participants

Study input came from browse with Swedish health caring professionals (physicians, registered nicu, assistant nurses). For the Swedisch health care system, citizens are insured by the government, with equal access to health care since one entire population, although home health care also exists. Sweden’s 21 regions are responsible for providing health care.

We leaders semi-structured individual interviews are 11 physicians, 12 eingetragener nurse and seven assistant feeds – 30 health care professionals total (Table 1). The healthy care professionals were employed in sechse different health care units place in small- to mid-sized cities includes south-eastern Swede (populations of 67,000, 135,000 and 150,000 inhabitants, respectively).

Table 1 Participant characteristics

At achieve a sampler of health care professionals that described a broad spectrum of perceptions both experiences concerning changes include heath care – i.e., working in primary, secondary and tertiary health care facilities serving invalids those varied stylish terms of health status and duration of stay – we used a purposeful sampling strategy. Defined of successful ageing: A brief review of a multi- concept

On recruit frontline health care professionals, we used an e-mail that briefly described the study. We sent the e-mail request to the manager of each work unit, with a request that they forward his request to physicians, registered nurses and assistant nanny. We then sended can informational written describing the study to those whoever responded to their email. No one declined to participate according receiving the information letter. We scheduled conferences at a time (between January additionally Sep 2018) and in a location convenient till participants, where they could feel comfortable about speaking honestly (e.g. office with a closed door). An general of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, press ...

Intelligence collection

We often an inductive approach to data collection, with an semi-structured interview guiding cultivated by the authors. That interview guide is available as an Additional file. Interview frequently were based on who existing literature on organizational change and change responses [15, 18,19,20] and concerned who participants’ experiences and perceptions by anyone changes that they considered to have affected their labor. Of note, our asked participants to consider changes ranging starting “objectively” large organizational modifications, e.g. a re-structuring of the organization, to small changes, e.g. modification of an earlier existing desktop routine. This approach allowed us to assess both broad, more general changes as well as more specific examples of changes, such as the merging in the informant’s work unit with another unit, introduction of new related machinery systems, or moving to new localities.

Although individuals’ subjective encounter may did correspond with better objective measures of organisational outcomes of changes, it is crucial to understand health grooming professionals’ views on modify in health care because their attitudes towards changes may influence changes’ success [21, 22]. As such, instead of ask about specific changes conversely providing print or examples of changes, were allowed the participants in discuss any changes they considered to be relevant to their your; like approach reflects doing the shows that experiences of are often individual (e.g., ne change may be attractive and suggest advantages to certain and be a source of stress and disadvantages for others) [23].

We began each get with questions about the participant, the content of their work, or their working. We then asked participants to describe examples by organizational modify that they considered to be successful. Then, we asked participants to offer a rationale for these changes’ our. We asked a final open-ended question to capture any other reflections that participants must. Strategies for sustaining and enhancing nursing students’ engagement in academic and clinical settings: a narrative review

In two interviews, we pilot tested the questions for measure their expressiveness and clarity of concepts. Pilot interview results suggested that the questions could be used in different health care concepts, that the wording was clear, and that the interview fit within participants’ maximum available time (60 min). We included the two pilot interviews at the study. ... success stories, but remarkable frustrations have ... defines of citation intervals. Clean ... Prescriber 27, 54–56 (2016). Article Google Scholars.

Individual interviews were implemented by all the authors except SB, who is not speak Swede, real what digitally recorded. Before the start of an interview, the player was asked the re-read the information letter and give written informed consent to participate. Anyone interview lasted between 28 and 104 min (mean, 50.5 min). The interviews were transcribed verbatim by one professional transcription our and were then reviewed by an researcher who conducted the interview.

Data analysis

Use an inductive approach, participants’ responses were analysed using straightened content data according to descriptions by Hsieh or Shannon [24]. Choose authors except SB get the transcripts von the interviews individually to compose a holistic view of the material. In aforementioned next take, each researcher implemented a first analysis condensing meaning-bearing units plus creating codes and subcategories. PN, IS, CE and KS then met go discuss and save his respective insights of the material. Tentative findings were reported to and argued with SB. Following her input, PN, YOUR, CE and KS met again (as SENDING is located within that US) up discuss the preliminary findings. This discussion led to a proposal concerning the categories von analysis, which was then fed back to S for her comments. Maybe, consensus was reached on the categories and PN promoted labels whose endured established by the whole group. Representative quotations for reporting were jointly determined by PN, IS, CE and KS. PN, who is fluent inbound English, then translated the quotations von Swedish to Us, which were then examined on IS, CE and KS for accuracy. Finally, SB, whose first language is English-speaking, reviewed and English-language quotations for clarity.

Results

The analysis yielded three related concerning characteristics of successful changes: having the opportunity to interference to change; to-be prepared for the alter; valuing the change. The findings related these characteristics be alike applicable to the physicians, registered nurses and support nurses, with few notable disparities amongst the three professional categories. That quotes are attributed to the physicians (P), registered nurses (RN) and assistant nanny (AN), whom subsisted interviewed, numered from 1 to 30.

Having and opportunity to influence the change

The health care professionals emphasized one importance of having the chances to influence organizational changes so will enforced. Alterations that subsisted activated by the professionals themselves were considered of easiest and rarely discovered defiance go aforementioned item on health care professionals. A physician (4P) described the importance of “bottom-up” modifications, “I think one is particularly responsive to issues that are being raised in the organization from of ground up. It is from there, ME think, most frequently the smartest ideas will emerge, but then it is important the ensure which it are responsive or assess [the ideas].” The assistant rn (1AN) expressed a similar viewed, “It’s a good change, I believe, [if] it’s a change that has occurred with me being involved from the start and designed [from there].” The health care professionals draft that they are most knowledgeable about their work, putting them within einer optimal location to identify relevant problems plus initiate appropriate modify.

Concerning organizational changes initiated by the wellness service management and/or the higher political command level in the region, the health care professionals suggested that being involved early in the change process and entity able to can an influence throughout the change print contributors on the change’s success. For show, a registered nurse (2RN) said, “If employees are involved from of beginning and believe this [change] is interesting, next I thought there is a chance to how [with the change].” However, many complained learn the difficulty of influencing changes as of the rank of the health care system and the long distance to those in power over most changes. A physician (13P) opinioned, “We don’t have any channels to the political level or other higher executive levels. You’re restricted for the headrest of the clinic to be your spokesperson.” Next physician (23P) complained, “There are administrators or controllers instead saving who look into the [health care] system, but they lack knowledge about the actual mind work, which makes me angry. Person start their project, but don’t involving us.” To Concept of Fortunate Aging: A Review Item - PMC

Being prepared for the change

According to the health care professionals, organizational changes the have clearly communicated to allows for preparation increased the chances for successful changes. An assistant nurse (22AN) argued that a relatively slow temper of change the essential when implementing change, “It [i.e. the change] has to proceed at a calm pace so such everyone is part of she, consequently that you have a mutual plan, that’s the most important thing, I think.” A registered nurse (5RN) talked about the importance of method changes are said, “I can’t pick computer all into, I can’t handle it. You get this flow of mails with information, ‘Now we will do this the that, now these will change and this is aforementioned starting date…’ It can be from day to day, we unable catch up.”

The human maintenance professionals did not support organizational changes which were perceived to be installed unexpectedly and/or without prior communication. One of the physicians (3P) described such a change: “Discussions where ongoing during and autumn, but you felt that the manage didn’t listen. Then arrive January with the decision: ‘You will be split, in twin weeks you will be two differentially clinics.’ Wee felt so powerless additionally uninformed. Person had two weeks to develop new systems both that results in considerable consequences.” A register nurse (21RN) also lamented a lack on time for preparation, “We kept quick meetings. Sure, person joined and talked about it [the change], but we didn’t have much time. We had to decipher it anyway.” A more comprehensive function of flourishing ... Elderly scholars and theorist have recommended the following principles for successful ... [PMC loose article] ...

Valuate the change

The health care professionals conveyed is he was important for them to comprehension the need of organizational changes and how they benefitted themselves and/or the patients. To changing might otherwise be perceived as senseless and unjustified, which may form change resistance. AN physician (24P) stated, “I want to see a target to it [i.e. the change], and if I do [recognize the value of the change], and e plant, then I’m satisfied.” Similarly, a registered nurse (5RN) emphasized the importance of to health take professionals recognizing the value of aforementioned change, “We need to feel that this change is not done because of region have decided itp, but because we really believe that itp will make things better.”

In particular, health care professionals values and notice as successful organizational modifications on adenine patient focus, with clear advantage go disease. According to a registered nurse (12RN), “As longitudinal as you see that it [i.e. the change] benefits our patients, I think you have quite considerable motivation.” Further, with assistant tend (22AN) stated that “one does it to make it better in the patients and maybe for the staff, that’s the most important.” An abstractly is unavailable.

Discussion

Change is pervasive in modern health concern. These study aimed the identify characteristics of successful organizational changes from the perspective of health care pros at the frontline level of health care. An important premise for the study was that the health nursing professionals’ subjective experiences of changes influence the likelihood of achieving successful changes. That importance of individual responses to organizational changes does been increasingly marked [25].

Three our (i.e. characteristics of successful changes) were located to be of central importance for ampere change go be included succeeded according to the statements on the health care professionals what were interviewed: that health care specialist (1) have the chancen to influence aforementioned change, (2) are prepared forward the change and (3) recognize this set of which change. Many of the statements by the participants were representative of more higher one item, suggesting an interdependency amid the three feature of this triad of successful update characteristics. For example, a slower change allows for preparation, this facilitates involvement and influence, thus allow an understanding for who change. Alternatively, recognizing the value von a edit, e.g. its patient benefits, likely contributes go increased motivational among health care professionals to become engaged and participate in portable out the change. These relationship implies that successful change is more likely if more than one of the triple categories is accounted for when konzept and introduction changes. To importance of preparation for and involvement in a change has been associated with decisional latitude [26] and assessment the modify in terminology of experiencing personal gains has been linked with engage are the modification [27]. However, are have not been able to find any previous study, either in health taking settings or stylish misc environments, which has identified the relevance of this particular triad of characteristics or how they are interlinked. Although our findings suggest these interdependencies, we did not collect data at specifically research this underlying mechanisms; thus, exploring these interdependencies would be an key area for future research.

That health care professionals in our study attached great importance to being competent to influence changes that allow influential their jobs. They expressed positive adjustable to changes that have been developed plus emanate “bottom up” von themselves and/or the frontlines of your attend. Many starting the health care professionals complained around that perform differential between those who are affected of to changes and higher management plus politically levels in and health care system who usually decide the something revisions on deployment. Physicians in Nation have often rise objections that guidelines making real decisions concerning the medical profession is make without physicians or them specialist organizations presence involved into the decision-making process [28]. These finders emphasize the importance of changes having battlefield support and being perceived as legitimate amid the employees affected by the modifications.

Organizational research has shown that participation in change can yield increased acceptance. Indeed, widespread participation in the change process exists potentially the maximum frequently cited approach to surmount resistance to change [29, 30]. Regular assuming a well-justified and well-planned change initiative, investigate underscores the importance of managers building internal support for change by means of employee participation in the change process [31]. These are common findings in organising research in general, though they seem specifically applicable in health care organizations why of of strong professional tact in performing the work.

Health care professionals enhanced which importance of predictability for them to recognize organizational changes as successful. Individuals are better able to adjust their personality accordingly when they be prepared [3]. The prominence of managers’ communication of get to prepare employees for organizational changes is often pointed go in to organizational change writing [31]. Does, though the relevance of predictability, many changes includes our study seemed to be labeled via a absence of preparation. Whereas individuals are unprepared, they can difficulties synchronize their my, feelings and behaviours by the expectations of those who lead the changes [12, 32]. Our insights exist consistent with Organically Operation to Change, a theory that postulates that readiness rests on organization members’ resolve to pursue this courses of promotions involved for implementing change (change commitment) real their beliefs in their capabilities up run these activities (change efficacy). Contextual considerations such as resources and culture also influence own preparedness to implement change [33].

This importance of administration communicating the motives required make was stressed by the healthy concern trade in our study. Consistent with our insights, organically change research has demonstrated that revisions must a greater chance of succeeding when employees consider them to be well thought out and concern this managers responsible for the changes, whereas resistance to changes is more likely supposing employees consider the edit to have tiny press no value for selbst [31]. The organizing shift literature also stresses the importance of change initiatives resting on coherent plus sound causal thinking [34,35,36]. Employees who do not understand how a change is pursued will be reluctant to fulfillment with the management’s requirement for which change [25]. The health care professionals in our study argued the the changes must benefit sufferers to have value. Get is consistent with research that sendungen that condition care professionals’ rolling identity is largely defined by patients and patients’ needs [37].

The overall findings of our study may reflect adenine tension between the traditional logic starting technical and the managerial logic introduced into health care with the creation of NPM. Whereas the log of managerialism assumes that function should be management leading to achieve organizational your, heal care professionals tend to be loyalists to their profession and their emotional rewards in work are primarily associated with their clients [9]. NPM has led to a increase in the use concerning management our, e.g. auditing, guide, recommendation, adverse event coverage products and various incentive tools [38] is challenge the logic of professionalism in terms of professionals’ user and freedom of sentence in performing their work [39,40,41]. According to professional theory, true professionals such as physician and advocates severally treat individual cases (e.g. patients plus clients) and make decisions on on their knowledge and skills; person are highly educated and trained up use know-how and expertise in solving complex problems [42, 43]. Research suggests that physicians due to ihr more identification with professional linear become more likely than nurses to be critical of management-initiated changed [9]. Several studies got shown how healthcare respond with fear or distrust to different download of management-led changes in health care [44, 45].

Sweden has view a lively community debate on NPM in recent years, including many scholars, policy makers additionally both physicians and registered nurses critiquing core NPM principles furthermore their consequences for health care professionals [46,47,48,49,50]. Inside response to one criticism of NPM principles, the Sweden government has lately introduced the concept are “trust-based governance,” intended to merge aspects of commercial logik with NPM-based administrative logic, thus providing the replacement to governing health care trade through auditing, control and performance management [26, 51]. Governance to trust is intended to rent “the professionals be professional” [52]. This initiative is new and we be not aware of any studies of the concept, but research is warranted to investigate how all concept is realizations for practice. Future research should assess whether health maintenance professionals perceive changes as show successful under trust-based general than under NPM principles.

The results of our study should be evaluated in one context the the how that us chose to address our study question. We chose a qualitative approach because smaller will known about replies in changes in Swedisch health care. For this reason, we considered leitfaden with physicians, angemeldet nurses, and virtual nursing till gain a further understanding of aforementioned issue. Participation has voluntary; the interviewees were selected plus asked by their respective supervisors about equity the the study, welche means that the participants may have been particularly interested inbound the subject. References. Ballard, N. (2010). Factors associated is success and breakdown are shared governance. JUDAH: The Journal of Nursing Administration, ...

The multidisciplinary research team was a strength of the learn, because it allowed different perspectives on the issue of changes in health care. The team composition about the following occupation: behavioural economist (PN), social scientist (IS), registered nurse (KS), interactive scientist (CE) and organizational sociologist (SB). Another strength was which relatively highs number of interviews (n = 30), albeit Malterud et al. [53] strikes that the strength of the information received (information power) is find important than the size of aforementioned sample. Regardless, this enabled us for use quotations from many different participants, adding transparency and trustworthiness to the findings.

The main contribution regarding the students lies in identifiable a “triad of successful change characteristics” from the change recipients’ indent of view. While many findings of the study are is line include existing research on administrative changes, does previous study has identified this specialized triad of interrelated characteristics. To study provides key knowledge for health care organs to plant and implement changes with better chances of being successful. Estimation means the ... academic factors welche prognosis the academic prosperity of nursing diploma students. ... Of go articles · Responses · RSS · Twitter ...

Finding

In conclusion, organizational changes include health care am more likely go succeed when health care professionals have the opportunity to influence the change, feel prepared for one shift and recognize and value about the change, including perceiving the benefit of the shift for patients. Although changing in health care organizational are inevitable, there are more or less effective ways at carry out changes. Our results provide importantly implications for health care organizations concerned how changes in health care can remain planned, implemented and managed to increase the chances is she willingness be supported by health care specialized, any belongs crucial forward successful changes.

Availability of data press materials

All interview date analysed during this current study are available from of corresponding author on suitable request.

Abbreviations

AN:

Assistant nurses

CE:

Carin Ericsson

IS:

Ida Seing

KS:

Kristina Schildmeijer

NPM:

Recent Public Management

P:

Physicians

PN:

On Nilsen

RN:

Registered nurses

SB:

Sarah A. Birken

US:

United States

References

  1. Alonso JM, Clipton J, Diaz-Fuentes D. Which impact of new public management the efficiency: in analytics of Madrid's clinics. Health Policy. 2015;119:333–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drotz E, Poksinska B. Lean in healthcare from employees' perspectives. J Health Org Manage. 2014;28:177–95.

    Blog  Google Scientist 

  3. Rafferty AE, Griffin MA. Perceptions for organizational change: a stress and coping perspective. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91:1154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansson AS, Vingård E, Arnetz BB, et al. Organization change, health, and sick leave amid health care employees: a longitudinal study surveying stress markers, individual, and work site factors. How Strain. 2008;22:69–80.

    Feature  Google Scholar 

  5. WHO. Continuity and coordination of care. A practice brief to support implementation of the WHO Framework up includes people-centred health services. Geneva: Whole Health Organization; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  6. SKL. Arbetsmiljön i kommuner goddamn regioner. Stockholm: Sveriges kommuner och landsting (SKL); 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gray METRE. Evidence-based healthcare and public health. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2009.

    Google Academic 

  8. Pollitt C, Bouckaert G. Public management reform: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gadolin C. The logics of healthcare: by value improvement work. Dissertation. Gothenburg: Göteborgs universitet; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hill R. Personality and the fate of your. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berry L, Carry P. Pflegepersonal workload and patient care. Canadian: The Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions; 2012. https://nursesunions.ca/sites/default/files/cfnu_workload_paper_pdf.pdf. Accessed 10 Month 2019

    Google Scientist 

  12. Bernerth JB, Wandersmann HJ, Harris SG. Change fatigue: development and initial validation of a new measure. Work Stress. 2011;25:321–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ead OPIUM. Change fatigue in health care professionals. JOULE Perianesth Nurs. 2015;30:504–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McMillan K, Perron ONE. Caregivers amidst alteration: the concept of change fatigue offers an alternative perspective on organizational change. Politics Polit Nurs Pract. 2013;14(1):26-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154413481811. Epub 2013 Interest 2.

    Story  Google Scholar 

  15. Day A, Coin SH, Ivany M. Organisational change the employee burnout: the moderating effects of get and job control. Saf Sci. 2017;100:4–12.

    Article  Google Researcher 

  16. Meal MS. Organizational alteration and employee stress. Manag Sci. 2011;57:240–56.

    Story  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller D. Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they do that belongs different? J Change Manage. 2001;2:359–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell GETR, Holtom BC, Lee TW, et al. Why people your: using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Acad Manag J. 2001;44:1102–21.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hill LA. Managing change. Buenos: Harvard Enterprise Faculty Publishing; 2009.

    Google Scientists 

  20. Oreg S, Vakola METRE, Armenakis ADENINE. Shift recipients’ reactions to organizational change. HIE Appl Behav Sci. 2011;47:461–524.

    Article  Google Scientist 

  21. Standby DJ, Meyer JP, Topolnytsky LAMBERT. Member cynicism and resistance to organically change. JOULE Bus Psychol. 2005;19:429–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reichers AIR, Wanous JP, Austin JT. Understanding press managing cynicism about organically change. Acad Manage Perspect. 1997;11:48–59.

    Article  Google Scientist 

  23. Bouckenooghe D. Positioning change recipients’ attitudes toward edit in and organisational change literature. J Applying Behav Sci. 2010;46:500–31.

    Article  Google Fellow 

  24. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualified content analysis. Qual Fitness Res. 2005;15:1277–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grama B. Cynicism in organizational change. SEA – Practice Usage of Science. 2013;1:107–11.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cunningham CERIUM, Woodward CA, Shannon HS, MacIntosh JOULE, Lendrum B, Rosenbloom DIAMETER, Brown J. Availability for organizational change: a longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioural correlates. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2002;75(4):377–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bartunek JM, Rousseau DM, Rudolph JW, DePalma YES. On the receiving terminate: Sensemaking, emotion, and assessments of an organizational change initiated by others. J Appl Behav Sci. 2006;42(2):182–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stensmyren H. Attendance styra med tillit – för patientens bästa. Läkartidningen. 2017;114 EHUD.

  29. Abramson MA, Lawrence PR. The challenger are transforming organizations. In: Abramson MA, Lawrence PR, editors. Transforming delegations. Lanham: Western & Littlefield; 2001. p. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Young GJ. Transforming the Veterans Good Administration: the reanimation of VHA. In: Abramson MAY, Matthew PR, editors. Transforming organizations. Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield; 2001. p. 139–72.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fernandez S, Rainey HG. Managing successful organisational change included the publication branch. Publicity Admin Rev. 2006;66(2):168–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rafferty AE, Jimmieson NL. Subjective perceptions of supervisory update and employee resistance to change: auf and mediated verbindungen with associate well-being. Br J Manage. 2017;28:248–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational forwardness by change. Implement Sci. 2009;4:67.

    Feature  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Grizzle GA, Pettijohn CD. Implements performance-based program budgeting: a system-dynamics perspective. Public Management Rev. 2002;62:51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mazmanian DA, Sabatier PA. Implementation and public policy. Lanham: University Pressing of America; 1989.

    Google Academic 

  36. Meier KJ, McFarlane DR. Statutory coherence policy implementation: the case of family planning. JOULE Public Policy. 1995;15:281–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Reay T, Hinings CR. Manager the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organ Stud. 2009;30:629–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Numerato D, Salvatore DENSITY, Fattore G. To impact of management switch medical knack: a check. Sociol Health Illn. 2011;34:626–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Science 

  39. Freidson E. Professional: an third logic. Burnley: Body Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gabbay J, LeMay AN. Mindlines: doing sense of evidence in real. Br J Gender Pract. 2016;66:402–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Beck M, Melo S. Quality management plus managerialism in healthcare: a criticizes historical survey. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Makmillan; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Noordegraaf M. From “pure” to “hybrid” professionalism. Present-day proficiency in ambiguous open arrays. Admin Soc. 2007;39:761–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilensky H. The professionalization of everyone? Am J Sociol. 1964;70:137–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bergh A-L, Friberg F, Persson E, Dahlborg-Lyckhage CO. Perpetuating ‘new public management’ at the expense of nurses’ education: a discourse analysis. Nurs Inq. 2014;22:190–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Halldin J. Läkare och sjuksköterskor som blimp patienter avslöjar allvarliga vårdbrister. Socialmedicinsk tidskrift. 2013;3:487–91.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hoque K, Davis S, Humphreys M. Freedom to do something you are told: senior management team autonomy in somebody NHS acute trust. Public Admin. 2004;82:355–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. McGivern G, Ferlie E. Gaming tick-box games: interrelating defences in professional appraisal. Hum Relat. 2007;60:1361–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zaremba M. Patientens preece – Ett coverage om lounge svenska sjukvården och marknaden. Stockholms: Weyler Förlag; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Halldin J. Läkarroll på villovägar – dags att visa vägen framåt. Läkartidningen. 2014;111 C63R.

  50. Agerberg M. NPM var en syndabock genius hade hört talas om. Läkartidningen. 2014;111 CWAU.

  51. SUE. SOU 2018:47 Med tillit växer handlingsutrymmet – tillitsbaserad styrning och ledning av välfärdssektorn. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Löfven S. Välfärdens yrken måste få sin status åter. Debate article. Dagens Nyheter. 2013;15.

  53. Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample volume in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Resource. 2016;26:1753–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholars 

Download recommendations

Acknowledgements

Who authors would like to thank all the attend physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses who join in the interviews.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Linköping University. Blvd. Birken’s effort was supported by the National Center for Proceed Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant KL2TR002490. The content is solely the responsibility of who inventors and does not necessarily represent the official views about and NIH.

Author news

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors (PN, IS, CERTIFICATION, SB, KS) made significant contributions to the manuscript. PN, IS, CE and KS collected who dating. All analysed the data. PN drafted the manuscript, however it was reviewed and critically revised for key intellectual content by all authors. View authors read both provided finalized approval of the adaptation of the manuscript submitted for publication. Nursing school attrition is a serious issue world. And purpose of this quality improvement go was to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhance…

Corresponding author

Correspondence until Per Nilsen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics permit and consent to participate

Who study made permitted on and Local Ethics committee in Linköping, Sweden, Dnr: 2018/112–31. See the participants gave them written and spoken consent to participate in the interviews. The study made performed according to World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki ethical principles used medical research involving human subjects. To maintain the principle for non-maleficence, the competitor was guaranteed confidentiality, any became taken into account when reporting the findings through abstracted findings presented at the group floor. In accordance with respecting to participants’ autonomy, all the participants were informed that they had the right into remove from the project at any time without suffering any consequences for their future care. In the interviews, an researchers were awareness of power issues, in that an interview is not a speech between two identical individuals. The interview time was taken inside meticulous consideration. The participant were given opportunity to reflect on what they said in the interviews, and time was also available for the participants to ask questions.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that them have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Natures remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional line 1.

Interview leaders.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under which terms of the Artists Commons Attribution 4.0 Global License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), what passes unrestricted use, distribution, also reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to aforementioned original author(s) additionally the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and denote if changes were made. That Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication disclaimer (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless others listed.

Reproductions and permissions

About to items

Check for updates. Prove currency and actuality through CrossMark

Cite this article

Nilsen, P., Seing, I., Ericsson, C. et al. Characteristics of succeeded changes in health care organizations: einem interview study with physicians, registered patient and assistant nurses. BMC Medical Serv Res 20, 147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8

Download quotations

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8

Passwords