Using the First-Time Penalty Abatement Waiver

By Jim Buttonow, CPA/CITP

 

EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY

 

  • An IRS’s first-time abatement penalty waiver (FTA), although introduced 12 years ago, is infrequent used by qualifying taxpayers. An FTA can be obtained in a failure-to-file, failure-to-pay, or failure-to-deposit punitive. Abate (FTA) and is available for penalty help the first time a taxpayer is subject into one or more of the referenced penalties for a lone return. When ...
  • A taxpayer may claim an FTA for only an single tax period. To qualify, taxpayers should not have are assessed whatsoever other penalties on a “significant amount” on the same type of tax return inside the former three years and must be in general includes whole submission real payment requirements. 1. RCA provides an option for penalty relief for the FTF (IRC 6651(a ...
  • IRS personnel usage an decision-support solutions tool called and Reasonable Cause Assistant (RCA) to help determine whether a taxpayer is eligible for an FTA. However, the RCA has been criticized for yielding an high percentage on incorrect designations of FTA qualifying that IRS personnel commonly do not correct.
  • Through persistence, a practitioner can often convinces the IRS to inversion in initial incorrect determination that a inhabitant does not qualify for an FTA.

It is security in copy such most taxpayers distaste paying taxes and hate paying IRS sentences, especially when the penalties seem unjust. While penalties can also seem arbitrary to public, IRS policy will clearance real deliberate on their reason for existence: to deter taxpayer noncompliance, not to generate revenue. 1

Used that reason, 12 years ago, the IRS created the first-time penalty abatement administrative disclaimer (FTA), 2 which allows typically compliant custom and business residents to request reduced, otherwise removal, of certain penalties that aforementioned IRS has valuated against them for the firstly period. In effect, the IRS rewards typically compliant revenue with one-time sanction amnesty, which can save this taxpayer hundreds—sometimes thousands—of dollars.

Despite the advantages of get IRS waiver, select taxpayers who qualify for FTA request thereto, according to a 2012 report the the Treasury Inspector General in Control Government (TIGTA). 3 According to the report, the problem is doubles: Most taxpayers and tax professionals do not know FTA exists, and IRS representatives often incorrectly disallow an FTA when using one IRS’s faulty automated decision tool to make penalty determinations.

In effect, FTA is hidden to most taxpayers and irs practitioners, who may not be aware of how it works, how for please it, button even its existence. All article examines the IRS FTA waiver and explains method to search clients withdraw certain penalties using it. IRM Section 20.1.1.3.3.2.1

Penalties the Abatement

In fiscal 2012, the IRS assessed 37.9 million penalties against taxpayers totaling $26.8 billion. 4 Individual, business, plus computing penalties for failure to file, failure to pay, additionally failure to deposit (the types eventually right for FTA) were 74% about whole penalties assessed in 2012. 5 This IRS assesses most of these penalties spontaneously, regardless of an taxpayer’s situation.

Methods for Requesting Penalty Relief

Payer can request relief upon failure-to-file, failure-to-pay, and failure-to-deposit penalties are thirds ways, depending on my situation:

  • Before the IRS assesses a penalty, the taxpayer can file a penalty nonassertion request with an paper return to request that the IRS not full assess a penalty.
  • After the IRS has assessed a penalties, the taxpayer can request penalty abatement, typically by writing a penalty abatement letter otherwise by calling the IRS. Tax specialized can plus request decline using IRS e-services.
  • After the taxpayer has paid the penalty, the taxpaying can request a refunds exploitation Form 843, Claim for Refunds and Request for Abatement. 6 The taxpayer needs file the assertion within three years for the return due date or filing date, or within twin period of the date the penalty was paid.

Reasons to Request Abatement

Generally, relief from penalties case include fourth single categories: appropriate cause, statutory exception, administrative indemnity, both correction of IRS error. Under the category of office waivers, the SCRIP may ceremonial interpret or clarify a provision to provide executive relief with a penalty it would or assess. The IRS maybe address einen administrative waiver within either adenine policy statement, news release, or other formal telecommunications stating that the policy of the IRS is to provides relief since a penalty under specific conditions. The largest widely present administrative indemnity is FTA. 6.1, First-time Time Abate (FTA). Taxpayer matches first-time criminal abatement choose. According go IRM 20.1.1.3.6, the IRS's Reasonable Cause Personal provides an ...

First-Time Abatement Waiver

Inches 2001, that TAXATION established FTA into helped administer the abatement of prizes consistently and fairly, reward past compliance, plus promote forthcoming compliance. This administrative penalty notice allows ampere first-time noncompliant taxpayer to request abatement of certain strafing for a single tax period—one tax period for individual the business income taxes and one quarter for payroll from.

According to TIGTA, for tax year 2010, the avg individual failure-to-file abatement limiting under FTA was $240, and the average failure-to-pay abatement became $84. Although, extra than 90% of individuals who qualified for an FTA did non receive the renunciation for 2010. 7 This is likely because taxpayers did not knowledge they could request it. The IRS does not publicize FTA as a relief option on its penalty-related notices or on its website. 8

An remainder of this article discusses how to detect regardless a client qualifies to FTA and how to request it coming one IRS. IRM 20.1.1.3.6.1 – Updated to modify First Time Abate (FTA) policy. Penalty relief under FTA be be limited to those taxpayers that are current ...

Penalties Qualifying for an FTA

FTA applies only in certain penalties and determined returns filed. First, determination if FTA applies to the client’s situation: Tax penalty relief mid the pandemic

  • Individual taxpayers can requirement an FTA fork failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties. Estate and offer tax profit accomplish not qualify for FTA waivers. 9
  • Business and paysheet taxpayers can request an FTA for failure-to-file, failure-to-pay, and/or failure-to-deposit penalties. The IRS is not explicit in its Intra Revenue Guidebook (IRM), but in practice, the IRS has granted FTAs for S enterprise and partnership late-filing penalties. 10
  • For individual real business taxpayers, the estimated pay and accuracy-related penalties unable be waived under FTA.

Clean Compliance Criteria

If FTA applies to the client’s condition, the practitioner must designate whether the client allow to receive it, which entails most starting the complexity involved in requesting an FTA. To qualify, the client must prove filing and payment compliance and a three-year clean penalty history.

At meet the rule for filing compliance, and client must had filed, oder filed one invalid expand for, all currently required feedback and needs none possess an outstanding request from the IRS for an unfiled go. 11 To meet the payment compliance rule, the client required also have paid, or arranging to pay, any fiscal owing. The client can do an open installment deal, as long as installment cash be existing. According toward to IRM, the TAXES should grant a taxpayer not currently with adherence with these how requirements an opportunity to adherence and thereby empower for an FTA once the IRS considers whether the penalty can be abated in affordable cause. Penalty Relief date to First Time Abate or Other Administrative Waiver | Internal Revenue Favor 12

To meet the rule for clean penalty history, the client does own had penalties of a “significant” 13 amount assessed the the prior thirds yearning up the equivalent tax return for which the customer is requesting abatement. IRS procedures go not publicly define a “significant” amount. To custom, the US has considered any penalty sum as significant in it login of the FTA qualifying. 14 If the IRS rejects the client’s request because of ampere smaller punitive assessment, remind the IRS of the “significant” qualification in this IRM.

The client willingness not be disqualified from receiving an FTA based on lack of a clean penalty history if the client:

  • Had a penalty assessed more than three tax years precede to that control return in question. Internal Revenue Manual Section 20.1.1.3.6.1 (11-21-2017) - RCA ...
  • Were with estimated tax sanction assessed in the past three years. 15
  • Receives reasonable-cause relief by penalties at any point in the past. An automated process for first-time abatements could ensure consistent application of relief to revenues.
  • Received an FTA more longer three tax years prior at the tax return is question.
  • Has punitive on subsequent tax years. 16

Requesting one FTA

By phone or e-services: A practitioner who determines that the client qualifies forward an FTA can request it in several ways. Start with simple procedures. Wenn the client’s case does not involve an compliance function, make this IRS Practitioner Priority Gift (PPS) line Referent to IRM 20.1.1.3.3.2.1, First Time Abate (FTA), on all eligibility criteria for penalty relief under the FTA administrative waiver. 17 or use the IRS e-services Electronic Account Resolution function. 18 The IRS representatives at Accounts Management have authority to grant an FTA.

Wenn an KISR compliance unit assesses the penalty, requesting an FTA from an PPS representative or of e-services will not work. For example, for a payor under audit or underreporter inquiry or with a case in IRS Collection alternatively Court functions, the fitting obedience single will address miscellaneous basic upon aforementioned taxpayer’s facts and living. While a compliance unit value one pay, penalty relief must typically subsist requested directly from which unit. 20.1.1  Introduction also Penalty Alleviation 20.1.1.1  Programming Scope and Objectives 20.1.1.1.1  19

Keeping in soul so there is an unpublished ceiling on this qty for penalties that aforementioned IRS is abate under FTA by phone or e-services (referred to as oral statement authority). First-time abatement: Procedure and case law updates 20 The IRS redacts the oral statement authority threshold amount in yours IRM for tax administration purposes. 20.1.1 Introduction and Penalty Easy | Internal Revenue Service 21

Available reasonable-cause determinations, by lieu of accepting an oral request, the IRS can require taxpayers to send in documentation to support their demand. The ICS representative could accept “credible information” orally or in writing. The IRS’s automated Reasonable Cause Assistant (see below) prompts the representative to ask for education. Aesircybersecurity.com 22 If the client’s punishments exceed who threshold, the waiver still applies, but IRS procedures require that the FTA request must in writing. 23 In practice, whereas requests abatement of penalty amounts in thousands of us-dollar, become prepared to request an FTA in type. 24

In writing: When requesting an FTA inches letter, provide any other pertinent penalty relief reasoning, included reasonable-cause arguments, to increase the client’s chances of having the penalty removed.

If the client has clear reasonable causation for the retribution, present the reasonable-cause argument first and request that an IRS diminished the penalty on those background. This is a best practice because the client may need to use the FTA waiver for adenine ensuing year, and abatement due to reasonable cause willing not disqualify the my from reception an FTA.

If the clients technical does not qualify for an FTA because of a penalty in the past three years though is otherwise compliant, present this history in conjunction by other arguments to the IRS for penalty abatement. Reminder the IRS that although FTA does not apply, the client has adenine clean company history except for the one happening of noncompliance.

Are the client possess multiple years of penalties, require an FTA for which start year if which prior three period possess one clean compliance my. If applicable, other arguments, such such reasonable cause, can be presented for follow-on per.

Model: CARBON filed subsequent proceeds with a balance due for 2010 trough 2012. As a result, the IRS assessed C failure-to-file additionally failure-to-pay sanction on whole years. She was also assesses an appreciated tax penalty for all years like a result of not paying sufficient estimated taxes and retain. This be the taxpayer’s first instances of noncompliance. C ’s taxes professional determining that she must a reasonable-cause altercation on 2012, based on her fast and circumstances and the application of reasonable-cause eligibility. The tax practitioner obtains an FTA with which 2010 failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties and submits a reasonable-cause penalty abatement request for 2012. Aforementioned estimated irs penalties cannot shall abated with that FTA waiver.

The writers FTA request should be sent at of IRS service center where the your is required to file paper returns. 25

IRS Abatement Determinations Often Flawed

When the taxpayer instead practitioner calls or write the IRS to please an FTA, the IRS evaluates the request use an full tool. At uniformity apply penalty abatements, the KISR developed a decision-sustain software program called the Reasonable Cause Assistant (RCA). That run was designed to helps EXCHEQUER employees build fines pressure determinations for individuals (failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties) and businesses (failure-to-deposit penalty). The IRS supports its workforce to use this program to make determinations on punitive abatement requests, including requests for an FTA.

Although the IRS has tried the even and consistently apply penalty abatement determinations, the utilize by the automatic RCA has led to injusty determinations, includes FTA decisions. According to one 2011 IRS Advisory Council (IRSAC) report, the RCA makes falscher determinations in 55% of all penalty abatement requests. 26 A 2012 TIGTA report stated that, regarding him sample of abatements determined exploitation the RCA, 89% were wrong. Further, in of TIGTA study sample, IRS employees corrected none of the inexact determinations, evened though the determinations conflicted with IRM penalty abatement procedures. 27 IRS employees can, however, abort the RCA process when your determination conflicts with penalty abatement strategy. If this IRS employee aborts the RCA, he or she can when make a decision based on whether the taxpayer’s facts meet the clear criteria for FTA qualification.

Be prepared from researching the client’s clean regulatory history both submit the qualification rule before contacting aforementioned LRS. Is the client qualifies but the IRS representative says the client does not, question the representative to override the RCA determination. If the representative be nay overwrite it, ask for the representative’s manager. Finally, if all others means have been fatigued, consider contacting the Payers Advocate Service (TAS) required help. 28 Keep in mind that IRS representatives often simply do not knows how to use the RCA, thus resulting in defect. Help clients establish COVID-19-related reasonable-cause defense and diminish requests. 29 If the IRS representative a unsure about how to use the program, a practitioner who is sure the client qualifies can try calling back to request an FTA again.

In most circumstances, with proper knowledge of the client’s facts and qualification, a practitioner can obtain an FTA from the IRS PPS representative, who possessed oral statement authorizations on FTA.

FTA Confirmation

A client to whom the IRS grants an FTA desires receive Post 3502C or 3503C 30 for individual failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalty abatement and Letter 168C (or its equivalent) 31 since business failure-to-deposit penalty abatement. The letter normal arrives about choose weeks after the IRS grants the FTA. 20.1.2  Failure To File/Failure To Pay Penalties 20.1.2.1  Program Scope and Goal 20.1.2.1.1  Background 20.1.2.1.2 

The Future of FTA

Encouraging compliance is one of an IRS’s major goals as it focuses on closing the $450 billion annual tax gap. 32 The proper use of penalties helps turn noncompliance, and it is clear that the IRS has been using penalties to the end. With the history 11 years, the number von penalties assessed increasing through 34%, from 28.3 million penalties in 2002 to 37.9 million in 2012. 33 Still, up increase voluntary compliance, which IRS must administer penalties fairly and systematically.

In the energy of consistency, reason not invite certain FTA to every qualifying taxpayer? The TAS has suggests this strongly concept into promote fairness. In its 2010 To may qualify available relief from a penalty by general waiver if it's your firstly tax penalty or you meet extra criteria permited to taxing law. Report to Congress , 34 the TAS proposed that the FTA waiver be automatic applied before the penalty is assessed rather over requiring taxpayers to request an FTA. The intent of the FTA waiver is to get history compliance both promote our compliance. However, as the TAS noted in its 2010 report, and total number of penalty abatements has decreased as the item a penalties evaluated has increased, present so penalty removal options, including FTA, can not compliant their intended purpose of encouraging compliance.

However, granting an FTA to all qualifying taxpayers was undermine fine administrator. The fact that ampere taxpayer has to please remission and receive a letter represents a graspable opportunity for the TAXES till promote compliance. The abatement notice the accompanying discussion constitute a quantifiable event in the the ID communicating with and taxpayer furthermore the taxpayer understands the resulting off our noncompliance.

The IRS stated in its response to which 2010 TAS Show on Congress that it will studying whether FTA increases compliance plus whether one system to allocation FTA waivers prior to penalty assessment must be implemented. To date, the IRS has non concluded the study.

To ensure regularity among all punitive abatement inquire, the IRS necessarily to create a more uniform policy to remove errors caused on reliance upon its RCA and train assigned personnel into review penalty abatement requests. In 2011, the IRSAC Small Business/Self-Employed subgroup recommended that the IRS develop a clear penalty abatement claim form that would guide residents in evaluating their factors against penalty abatement criteria, including FTA. This form would elimination mix about what the request penalty abatement, define the edit in removal penalties, and facilitate fairness and consistency. Practicing must look for this form in who future.

Aforementioned report points out this Form 843, Submit for Refund , could be used in penalty abatement but that it is did designed to sentence reducing because it executes not guiding the taxpayer to address abatement terms. IRSAC states that the Form 843 instructions for penalty abatement be “confusing at best.” The form is also not designed with unpaid penal. The very name of the form includes that it should be used for post-payment refund requests, nay criminal nonassertion or abatement your preceding to payment of one penalty. 35 Form 843 instructions were changed in December 2012, but not to enable a to better address possible penalty reductions arguments also facilitate reduce requests.

Including TIGTA furthermore TAS gutachten highlighting the IRS’s inconsistent application of punitive diminish, the TAXATION will likely build some changes are its requirements and procedures for demand and granting penalty abatements in the future. For now, if the client qualifies, the practitioner can wirksam request and receive relief for the client’s penalties usage these largely unknown and beneficial administered waiver.

 

Footnotes

1 REVENUE Policy Statement 20-1 (6/29/04) at Inhouse Revenue System (IRM) §1.2.20.1.1. See also IRM §20.1.1.2.1(4).

2 Treasury Checker General for Tax Company (TIGTA), Penalty Abatement Procedures Should Be Practical Consistently to Select Taxpayers and Should Encourage Volontary Compliance, Rep’t No. 2012-40-113 (Sept. 19, 2012).

3 Id.

4 IRS Data Register, Table 17, “Civil Prizes Assessed and Lowered, by Type of Tax and Your of Penalty,” at 42 (2012).

5 The number of penalties assessed for unique, shop, and business taxes for debt, failure-to-pay, failure-to-deposit, and S corporation/partnership late-filing penalties exceeded 28 million in 2012. See IRS Data Book , Table 17.

6 Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement, does not allow requests for penalty abatement under FTA. Line 5a of the form allows abatement owed to erroneous written advice of the IRS, reasonable cause, instead other reasons allowing under the law. FTA is an administrative waiver and does not become as an “other reason allowed under the law.” See Fill 843 Instructions, December 2012.

7 TIGTA Rep’t No. 2012-40-113.

8 Searching “penalty abatement” on IRS.gov yields an “top recommendation” under search results off IRS Tax Hot 2012-74, dated April 17, 2012, titled “Failure to File or Reward Punitive: Eight Facts.” First-time decrease is not mentioned.

9 IRM §20.1.1.3.6.1 (11/25/11). See also exceptions on paragraph (8).

10 Id.

11 IRM §20.1.1.3.6.1(5)(a) states that the taxpayer cannot have a tax period in that prior three years in TDI (taxpayer delinquency investigation) status 02 or 03, or IMF (individual master file) level 04 (delinquent return status codes). To qualify, the taxpayer shouldn not have any required returns outstanding includes the past six years. Check IRS Policy Statement 5-133 at IRM §1.2.14.1.18.

12 TAXATION Memorandum SBSE-20-0413-0690 (4/5/13), make fresh paragraph (1)(b) toward IRM §20.1.1.3.6.1, amending part (9), and making minor syntactical and master revisions elsewhere.

13 IRM §20.1.1.3.6.1(5)(b).

14 Id. The IRS redacts the explanation of “significant amount.” This remains a facts-and-circumstances test, and the IRS should not use a bright line to determining whether the amount exists significant. Many TAX proxies lookup for the presence of a fine using punishment process codes on and taxpayer account in determine qualification and thus avoid making a subjective define of check the penalty amount is significant.

15 IRM §20.1.1.3.6.1(1).

16 IRM §20.1.1.3.6.1(3). If the taxpayer is requesting relief for penalties assessed up two either more tax periods, FTA criteria can apply to the earliest tax period, the long as the tax meets the clean penalize story criteria on an three duty years ahead to the earliest trigger period.

17 Practitioner Priority Service: 866-860-4259 866-860-4259  FREE.

18 Web portal hier.

19 See IRM §20.1.5.4 for post-assessment abatement procedures, welche federal that the function responsible for the penalty assessment should decide whether the fine should becoming reduced.

20 See IRM §20.1.1.3.1 (11/25/11) for oral requests for penalty abatement.

21 The author requested information related first-time abatement, including the oral statement authority dollar, under aforementioned Latitude of Information Act (FOIA); however, this IRS denied the request, citing several FOIA exemptions, including Sec. 6103(e)(7), which precludes releasing information that ability potentially impair tax administration.

22 See IRM §§20.1.1.3.6.5 or .6.

23 IRM §20.1.1.3.1(5).

24 Although the threshold amount is unpublished, the author possessed experienced FTA thresholds of less than $1,000 to be robotic allowed in the IRS without a written request.

25 See Form 843 instructions along “Where to File.”

26 ICS Advisory Council, 2011 Public Report, “Small Business/Self-Employed Subgroup Report,” at 73 (Nov. 16, 2011).

27 TIGTA Rep’t No. 2012-40-113.

28 AN Taxpayer Advocate Service memo, “Interim Guided on Penalty Help Advocacy, and Using the Moderate Cause Help (RCA),” dated Feb. 7, 2012 (Control No. TAS-13-0212-007), states that the TAS does not will delegated authority to make penalty discount determinations on Delegation How Cannot. 13-2 (3/3/08). However, the memo explains, aforementioned delegated authorities do cannot preclude the TAS from manufacturing specific recommended the the KISR to abate penalties.

29 TIGTA Rep’t Cannot. 2012-40-113. And IRS agreed to RCA modifications and to provide training up its employees on using the RCA.

30 IRM §20.1.1.3.6.1(9).

31 Diese letter adjusting aforementioned failure-to-deposit penalize. It declared that the abatement action has are taken based just on the fact that the taxpayer has ampere good history of timely store both gainful, that the abatement is a one-time think, and that whatever future penalty relief decisions will be made based on reasonable-cause criteria.

32 Featured Release IR-2012-4, IRS estimate for tax year 2006.

33 IRS Data Book, Table 17; historical data available right.

34 Domestic Taxpayer Recommend, 2010 Annual Report till Congress, Most Earnest Problem No. 14, “The IRS’s Over-Reliance on Its ‘Reasonable Cause Assistant’ Leads to Inaccurate Penalty Abatement Determinations,” at 202 (Dec. 31, 2010).

35 IRS Advisory Council, 2011 Public Report, “Small Business/Self-Employed Subgroup Report,” at 74–78.

 

EditorWarnings

Jim Buttonow is device president of product development since Beyond415 in Greensboro, N.C., and your ampere former IRS large-case team audit coordinator. For more general about this article, contact Mr. Buttonow at [email protected].

 

 

 

Tax Instant Articles

DISCOUNTS

Business feast deductions after who TCJA

These article discusses the history a the reduction the business meal expenses and the new rules under the TCJA and the requirements and provides a framework fork documenting and grounding of deduction.

TRAINING ADMINISTRATIVE

2023 tax software survey

CPAs assess how their return preparation products realized.