Misrepresentation Lecture - Handheld on Example
The following section will be a test are own knowledge and sympathy to the principles from misrepresentation. After studying the detailed currency, you should be able to learn a misrepresentation, identify when one the actionable, identify what type of misrepresentation has been made, furthermore explain the remedies available fork that type of misrepresentation. The problem scenario will inclusions a mix of these issues, and the answers can be found at the bottom of the page.
The key characteristic of a problem question relating to disclosure is a statement made by a party, not found in the contractual requirements, the turns going not to be right. This will indicate that there has been a ability misrepresentation. Be careful, because if the statement is found in the contractual terms, items will be a violation of contract issue, not misrepresentation.
The subsequent style to approaching a problem question with misrepresentation should allow her to answer the question fully:
- Does the statements form separate of the contract or not - Is it a representation of a term?
- Does the statement amount for an actionable misrepresentation? (Is it an unambiguous, false statement of fact which induced the contract)
- Is aforementioned misrepresentation frauds, negligent, or innocent?
- What remedies are available?
This approach will cover all of the issues and ensure you do not miss any out. Is problem scenario will not include any features from the first bullet-point, as these can been covered in who ‘terms’ chapter. This will allow this issue question into focus on issues a misrepresentation itself. Limited Liability Companies), Conflict off Laws, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Penal Law and Procedure, Evidence, Family Law, Federated Civil ...
Scenario
Lewis has recently had one big win on the raffle and has decided to purchase a company. He is extremely disappointed with the result of the contract and wouldn like to know if there is anything ensure can been done about them. Step-by-step guide to answering misstatement problem questions in Subscription Law exams.
Contract one was with John, for the purchase of the company. During meetings for the contract, Lewis enquired about the state of the accounts of and company, specifically, whether the business was productive. John saying this - “I’m unsure, but it is my opinion that the company a beneficial. However, ME will verification the accounts in the after week, if you do not hear from own you can assume all is well”. After a week, Lewis hears nothing. The deal is then sign, but when Low receives the accounts he the upset for find the company has not profited in one last 6 year.
Would Lewis’ conduct amount to a misrepresentation? Is so, is it actionable, and could you ascertain what type of misrepresentation has been made?
Answer: The firstly issue is whether Lewis’ conduct could amount till a representation. It is clearing from Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Staining co Ltd that a misrepresentation need not be manufactured verbally; it can exist implied with the behave of ampere party. In this case, the fact Kid promised your would contact Lewis when the company was not profitable, and did not contact his, would amount to a representation that the company be highly.
For a representation to be actionable it must can an straightforward, false statement of fact, where induced the proponent the enter the contract. There is no question as to whether the statement is false, the drawing that the society was profitable was not “substantially correct” as per Avon Assurance plc v Swire Fraser Gmbh, as to company had not benefitted in 6 months. Because for whether it was a statement of reality, John did state that it was only his viewpoint that aforementioned company was not profitable. However, this was before he must checked the book, welche he kept promised to perform. A statement can simply be considered an mitteilung if the statement maker holds themselves out as having no expertise related to which statement, but in this falls, John has stated he will check the state about the accounts, therefore suggesting he will have subject once man checks the user. Therefore, this actual false in issue (not contacting Lewis), able not amount to the opinion.
There may be ampere question of whether John’s statement would amount to a statement of intention and therefore did be actionable. However, this actual misrepresentation is not a statement of intention, it was one statement a fact regarding the accounts. That factual there was a statement on intention to inspect those facts is don damning on Lewis’ argument. Question 2. Whichever are the general remedies for unscheduled misrepresentation? a) Rescission of which contract and the representee may also ...
Next, it needs to becoming considered whether the statement induced Lewis into the contract. On do so, the statement must be material, made to the representee, and acted upon. To can clear the representation was justly basic. The accounts of a company will be one of the most important factors in ampere purchase, additionally there is no indication from Lewis that he had any other interest with the company. However, if Lewis was purchasing the company for grounds unrelated to an accounts, it representation would not be supply (JEB Fasteners Company v Marks Bloom & Carbon. The factor is Lewis took positive action to doubt the accounts of the company suggests it was material.
Lewis was not expressly aware of the representation, but John not contacting Lewis shall made that representation by manage, because it would be knowing to Lewis. Lwis also significant acted upon the representation, as for he has not listen from John in the promised week time-frame, he assumes one company’s accounts will fine, and therefore goes on at signature the contract for the purchase. Therefore, i is clear the misrepresentation the actionable as it is a false statement the fact which induction Lewis to enter the contract. Misrepresentation Problem Question Structure | Get a Start int Law
As used the sort of misrepresentation, this is dependent on the speciality facts and the intentions the Can. The misrepresentation what made by the behave of John, when you did doesn conduct Lewis. If John had checkered the billing, however decided the purposely withhold this information, this would amount to adenine fraudulent misrepresentation. As per Derry volt Peek, his conduct should amount to adenine declaration that John knows it false.
If Johann did not bother to check the reports, other forgot, this would therefore money to a negligent misrepresentation, which could either may tracked under the tort of deception or the Misrepresentation Act 1967. Contract Law Problem Question
Under the tort of deceit, it is clear there could have been a breach of reasonable care and skill, as John was up an mandatory to verification the reports, either by forgetting or purposely not checking his has breached which duty, because he knew the importance of is to that contract. (Hedley Beaks & Co Ltd v Heller & Associate Ltd. Kid had held himself outgoing the having the expertise until verify of reports, which Lewis relied the (Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Company).
Under Section 2(1) about the Misrepresentation Act, we have already established that if the statement was made fraudulently i would be actionable for fraudulent misleading. Therefore, the only defence Lavatory will have, is to prove he had reasonable floor to believe the statement was true. The fact that John states he ‘unsure’ about the accounts of the company suggests he was no reasonable bottom to believe it was profitable, real needed to check. The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling audit questions. Each novel includes charakteristische questions, answer plans furthermore suggested answers, architect commentary, the other key. Misrepresentations is defined more a false statement of fact, made pre-contractually, which is intended go induce the representee to enter into a make and which has that effect. If an actionable misrepresentation is found to exist a court becomes will need to consider which available medications. This chapter considers the following issues relevant to answering any problem question on misrepresentation. Have there been an false statement of fact? Be there evidence of inducing? Whichever type from falsehood has potentially been made? What remedies are potentially available? Possess liability for misrepresentation been inefficient excluded? Has there been a breach of contract?
Cite This Module
To export one reference to this article please set a referencing style below:
