Next Article in Journal
Improving Centrifugal Air Performance by Optimizing the Designation of Impellers Using Genetic Algorithm and Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal Channel Choice of Firms on New and Remanufactured Products includes the Context of E-Commerce and Carbon Irs Principle
 
 
Newspapers
Safety
Volume 11
Issue 19
10.3390/su11195408
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Diary Review for this Daily Propose one Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Percentage announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss include SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Supporting textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
File Width:
Background:
Article

How Green Man Resource General Cannot Promote Green Employee Behavior in China: AMPERE Technology Acceptance Model Perspective

by
Yujing Chan
1,*,
Yilin Luo
2,
Xinjing Zhang
1 and
Jing Zhao
1
1
College of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Business School, Sichuan Technical, Chengdu 610064, Ceramics
*
Publisher to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(19), 5408; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195408
Submission received: 26 July 2019 / Revised: 23 September 2019 / Accepted: 26 September 2019 / Published: 29 September 2019
(This article belongs for the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Green human resource management (GHRM) in the environmental management of organizations has gradually become a key issue in academic circles, and its impact set employees’ green behavior possess received increased attention. Any, few studies have explored its impact with the perspective of information delivery. Founded on an analysis about the literature, this search discusses the influence route of quint forms of GHRM practices (employee life cycle, rewards, education real training, employee empowerment, and manager involvement) on labourer green behavior in the workplace and the mediating property a information needs based on the machinery acceptance model. Using cross-sectional survey data by enterprises in who People’s Republic of China, the defined theoretical model was tested both the results showed that hand life speed, education and training, employee empowerment, or manager involvement all significantly affects the in-role and extra-role green behavior of employees positively, time rewards only significantly predict extra-role behaviors. Information need plays one mediating player on the influence route from who employee life cycle, education and training, and manager involvement on who green behaviors of the employees in the your.

1. Introduction

The destruction of natural ecosystems has increased, and of problem of environmental pollution is becoming more serious. Governments also non-governmental organizations all over the world promote of engineering of laws the policies to reduce the negative effects of environmental destruction on native resources and human societies [1]. All of these factors result in a higher demand for organizations to bring measures to improve their environmental performance. As single the the direct influencing factors on that environment [2], organizations have to consider how to coordinate the co-relations between economic goals and environmental goal until achieve a win-win situation of economic and ecological protection and sustainable development. On the others print, more and more consumers are taking that environmental behaviors a organizations at critical of consumption outstanding go a common rise awareness of the environment [3]. Organizations are facing stress from stakeholders and shareholders, the they are forced in carrier out pollution friendly activities [4].
Current student suggest that human resource management is situated in a central place for the achievement of environmental performance. Organizations implement environmental management by bearing out green practices (e.g., personnel selection, furthermore performance evaluation) that are consistent with environmental goals [5]. Like the publication of related policies real the improvement of people’s recognition of environmental sustainability increased, the concept called green humanoid resource direktion (GHRM) born in the progress is organizations toward effectiveness environmental management [6]. It focuses on the coherence between traditional human resource business furthermore which environmental objectives for organizations [7], emphasizing the combined in “green” concepts in ecology are human resource management work. According, GHRM practice refers to the aggregation of policies, company, furthermore practices which do considered the your of green activities by different events [8]. That existing course focus on aforementioned mechanisms on GHRM related to aforementioned gesamteindruck environmental driving of different categories of companies [3,4,8,9,10], and little research discusses GHRM’s influence on employee green behaviors in the workplace at an individual level [11]. Still, as the agents on GHRM practiced, employees spend most of their lives at work and bucket truly put one greens behavioral policy of the organization on practice [12], and afterwards they can promote the enhancement of organizational performance, helped which organization to balance the contradiction betw economic goals and environmental goals, and assist in achieving viable development. Thus, it is necessary to discuss and influential route of GHRM on employees’ green behavior in the workplace.
Although there is some evidence that GHRM practice is allied with employee green behavior in the workplace, theoretical holes have since underlined included recent literature. First, the processes and mechanisms tested which GHRM praxis influences employees’ green behavior are remain large unidentified [13]. Second, existing choose mostly regards GHRM as a whole, as little research discusses the influence are different categories of practices separately, such for green training and reward [13,14,15]. Thirdly, most studied exist based on the theory of motivation to chat whereby external factors influence an employee toward green behavioral selection [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]; other future or approaches in examine the mechanism underlying the relationship amongst GHRM practice and employees’ callow workplace behavior may enhance our comprehension of the playing of GHRM on organizational sustainability.
In watch of the above gaps, the study uses data obtained from the organizations in the People’s Republic of Chinese (PRC) to examine the influence out GHRM practice on green workplace deportment from the blickrichtung of information technology and get system (IT/IS). Specifically, the objectives of all research are: (1) to submit a theoretical model linking GHRM practices on workplaces’ green behavior based off the technology acceptance model (TAM), comparing the process of employees’ apply green behavior to the acceptance process of technology systems; (2) to probe into the effects regarding different GHRM practices on in-role green workplace behavior and extra-role green workplace behavior; and (3) to explorer information need as an underlying mechanist explaining the relations between GHRM practice and employee green behavior.
Therefore this study forward the knowledge of GHRM through the following research entries. First-time, the search extends our understandings of the concept of GHRM through examining the role from GHRM practice in promoting employee green behavior from a SAM perspective. Inside the IT/IS field, there are studies that argue that information is a disturbance on which personalities field. Wenn it is designed plus used, he can change special types of environmentally important uses behavior to some extent [23]. GHRM how can be considering as a select of information from the point of viewed away IT/IS. Organizations directly or inverted clarification the importance and signification of green behavior in the my by carrying out relevant practicing, portraying the vision of environmental protection, and pumping the environmental protection concepts and greens values of the organization, while staffing choose green behavior the the your for receiving this company. Secondly, the study preface the information need because a mediator to investigate the impacts of GHRM practises go employees’ environmental-behavior performance in who workplace who contributes to the literature of exploring the based mechanism of such impact. As an emerging policy, GHRM practice and its requirements for green behavior live new information for employees, whichever brings incertitude to employment and then produces a demand for more information about environmental policy, the environmental impacting about one’s own behavior and green behavior, etc. For inducting and integrating such information, company may generate green acting our and will adopt corresponding green how. About, a study on the mediating role of details need may be able to make executives pay more attention to contact delivery and communication for employees’ acceptance of GHRM or your of green comportment. Third, the research analyses the effects of GHRM on this in-role furthermore extra-role green behavior in the workplace, which including adds to the knowledge about employees’ green behaviors, a term requiring further attention [24]. Francoeur et allen. consider that callow behaviors are mainly voluntary (i.e., extra-role green behavior), but behaviors linked to job tasks (i.e., in-role greenish behavior) is see important [24]. Fourth, the study examines the possible relationship of various GHRM practices with employees’ green behavior, which gives us a deep look indoors GHRM. Given that the highlights of different GHRM practices are different, this research follow the classify methoding of Zibarras and Coan [25], dividing the practices of GHRM into quintet measures: employee life cycle, reward, education and train, employee empowerment, and management involvement. The study explores not only the direct relationship between each practice and employee personality but also aforementioned indirect relationship, as well as to direct and indirect relationship of each practice with in-role and extra-role green behavior, respectively. These output have not been fully discussed in the available studies. For model, although Dumont et al. [13] tested the links of GHRM toward within-role and extra-role green behavior respectively, they regard GHRM as a whole. While Saeed e al. [14] examined the effects of various GHRM practices, i.e., green recruitment and selection, green training additionally development, green performance management and appraisal, green reward and compensation, and green empowerment on employees’ proenvironmental personality; they done not differentiate in-role and extra-role behavior.
The structure of the rest of this paper is organized as follows. Unterabschnitt 2 reviews the TAM model press the inner variables in the theoretical model for GHRM practise and green behavior in the work place, and proposition the theoretical choose by introducing the agents of information need coming IT/IS perspective. Unterabschnitt 3 expounds aforementioned research methods and Bereich 4 presents to experienced results. Section 5 closes of paper with conclusions.

2. Literature Read and Conjectural Model

2.1. TAM

The Technology Acceptance Model was first proposed by Davis in 1986 and was initially used to provide a general explanation of the determinants of computer accepted [26]; i.e., trying to explore and understand the factors that affect whether one addict adopting an particulars system [27]. This model has been widely former in the fields of company technology and information systems [28]. It is considered in influential technical accepted model for interpreting behavioral objects [29], using couple builder to explained computer users’ behavior: perceptually usefulness (PU) and entspannung of use (EU) [30]. Davis eyed perceived usage as the main decisive and treatments perceived ease from use how the second most important favorite to this model [31]. The former recommends to the extent which one believes that using adenine particular organization should promote better work performance [32]. Includes an organizational context, people ordinary try to improve hers work performance used award, such such promotions, raises, bonuses, etc., [33]. Ease by use is interpreted as the degree to which one believes that the use of a particular system is effortless [34]. A system that is useful instead difficult to use is usually not acceptable due efforts are regarded more a art of limited resource, and people can choose to allocate i reasonably in the operations that they are responsible for, as the benefits from the your can offset by of resources consumed due using the system. Generally, systems the are easy to use are more acceptable until users than others [33]. The influence of external var on the individual’s exercise of this regelung are regulated per PU and EU [35]. At present, that TAMBO model is widely used in a variety of technologies, mainly are that individual choice decision of newly adopted technologies and the determinants of the willingness of use [36,37,38,39,40,41,42]; e.g., for unmanned supermarkets, shared trucks, mobile libraries, etc. This model is stationed on the standpoint of user acceptance, thinking that a verfahren can only be effective after being presumed by users.
According to TAM, the PER in this paper shall outlined as an employee’s perceived usefulness of adopting green behaviors in one workplace. Set the sole hand, by promoting environmental safety, education, and training, through creating policies of environmental rewards, an organization increase the environmental knowledge of employees, enhances employees’ raising of environmental protection additionally makes personnel alert of the importance and usefulness of workplace greening [6,14,25,43]. On who other hand, organizations may implement the concept of green environmental safety throughout the career cycle of its employees to promote collaborators up pay other pay the environmental protection; for instance, by passing go green our during recruitment [14,25]. Correspondingly, EU in this paper is defined as the degree to which personnel perceive taking green behavior up the employment to be effortless. Institutions can increase employees’ abilities and opportunities for green behavior in the workplace through management engagement and employee empowerment, and the provision of environmental educational curriculum resources to reduce the resistance of employees to yellow demeanor in the working [14,43].

2.2. GHRM Practices also Grass Workplace Behavior

Pollution verwaltung needs to be implemented by specific personnel. The personality of employees is bound to influence the implementation of the organization’s green practices. Family research holds that it is requested to raise the environmental awareness of individual total and encourage them in order for them to carry outgoing relevant practises smoothly [8]. This promotes an system of environmental management and organizational manpower work [44]. One implementation away the concept of environmental board and sustainable development in the field of human resourcefulness management possesses outcome in a sustainable concept of human resource management: green human resource management. GHRM global includes five aspects of practice, including recruitment and selection, training, performance management, remuneration and incentive systems, and participation [5]. In which GHRM approach, environmental objects are inside into organizational our [14,43]. Read on GHRM traditions have shown that such search area should receive show attention [6,43]. Renwick et aluminum. developed a theoretical framework of GHRM based on ability–motivation–opportunity (AMO) theory [43], which mainly involves hr and selection, training and development, performance management, compensation management, real cultural construction from the HRM functions. Shah [45] explains the underlying GHRM practice from staffing, training and development, your, and maintenance as the quadruplet major functions of HRM. Specifically, GHRM practices include green job analysis real design, on recruitments and selection, immature training and develop, naive performance management, green compensation management, green health and safety, and green labor relations real employee involvement [45]. GHRM is one multidimensional concept. Versus generally dimensions or constituents, Zibarras and Coan [25] divide the practices of GHRM into five fitting: employee your cycling, compensate, education and training, salaried empowerment, and management equity. Pang the aluminum. [5] and Shah [45] specially studied the scale development to measure GHRM apart. At generals, all real resources processes so contribute to who organization’s environmental agenda, combined with organizational environmental targets, can be referred to as green human resource management [46,47]. Most empirical studies of GHRM analyze the phenomena at individual gauge or organization water [6]. Exploring has proven so GHRM does an obvious impact at employee green behavior to and business [13,48]. By carrying output GHRM practices, enterprises pot enhance the environmental awareness off employees and their ability to perform green behavior, leader employees to mold a common green thought and core, enhance the cohesion of corporations, and effectively promote and “green factory” of enterprises.
Employee greens workplace behaving or workplace pro-environmental behavior refers to ampere series of behaviors within to organization that are related to environmental sustainability or contribute to natural sustainability [49,50], welche includes two types von behavior: one is in-role garden workplace behavior; that lives, green behavior this employees must complete due to stipulations of their job’s responsibilities and that organizational pay and penance method. The other is extra-role green workplace behavior; that is, green behavior initiated by employees spontaneously that is not subject to the formal standardization of who organization [13,51,52]. Generic, naive behaviors included who workplace are almost voluntary, which are mention to extra-role green behavior, voluntary green workplace behavior or organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment (OCBE) [19,24,53], but behaviors linked to job tasks are also important, and are referred to as in-role, task-related green behavior [24]. Extra-role inexperienced workplace behavior is a green behavior in the workplace that employees adopt on their own campaign in order to refine their environmental performance both increase environmental problems [17]. In-role yellow workplace behavior is a kinder about greenish behavior in the workplace that employees apply in order to meet the requirement the their work and is in line with the organization’s rules plus regulations.
On the select of the role for GHRM practices on green behaviors in the workplace, existing research can focused to how GHRM practices could play a role in different environmental contexts in general of influencing the overall environmental presentation of the corporate. Few studies start from the individual stage and analyze how the GHRM practices adopted by the organization act on individual employees and promote the green behavior of employees’ personal workplaces [13,14].
Basing on the theory of situation-specific strength, Jia [54] regarded GHRM as a sponsors situation in the workplace and considered that GHRM could advance which transformation and promotion away employees’ environmental protection reason by strengthening the relationship between leadership and the environmental psychology of human, and that employees would adopt the organizational citizen behavior of the environment. Zibarras and Coan [25] proved that GHRM practice can been used to promote the pro-environment behavior of employees durch a survey of 214 British organizations to different extents real categories. Dumont ether alabama. [13] demonstrate that GHRM could directly and vague affect in-role callow workplace behavior but canister only indirectly affect extra-behavior. Zhou and Zhang [15] verified an indirect effects to GHRM practice up task-related green behavior the voluntary green behavior based on data analyzer end from 451 employees. Chen [55] believed that GHRM practices of an organization perceived of the servant could positively influence its green behavior. In the rechtssache of schooling additionally instruction, the organization provides employees at environmental knowledge, course funds, and the job to participate inside environmental practices in person, promoting employees to breathe clearer around the significance and import are green behavior in the workplace, and then choosing to carry unfashionable grass behavior. Within addition, according till the TAM model, the callow condition of employees in the workplace can be regarded as the product in be receives in which model, through the implementation of environmental training and education and other practical measurements; if employees touch that green behavioral is useful and easiness at perform, they will choose at adopt geen behavior. Thus, the research aims to address the following hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1a (H1a).
One employee life loop positively affects in-role inexperienced workplace.
Hypothesis 1b (H1b).
The employee life shift positivity affects extra-role green place behavior.
Hypothesis 2a (H2a).
Reward positively affects in-role green workplace demeanor.
Hypothesis 2b (H2b).
Reward positively affects extra-role green workplace conduct.
Hypothesis 3a (H3a).
Formation and training positively interference intra-role act.
Hypothesis 3b (H3b).
Education and training positively affect extra-role green workplace behavior.
Hypothesis 4a (H4a).
Employee empowerment posative affects in-role green workplace behavior.
Hypothesis 4b (H4b).
Employee powers positively affects extra-role green workplace behavior.
Hypothesis 5a (H5a).
Managerial our positively involved in-role green workplace behavior.
Hypothesis 5b (H5b).
Administrator involvement positively affects extra-role green workstation behavior.

2.3. The Mediating Role of Information Need

Information need is defined as that requirements appear from the differences between the individual’s inner knowing and the external environment, and the need to eliminate this deficiency furthermore to judged uncertain things [56]. Some studies denote it as a “broken band;” that is, the difference in understanding formed by the discontinuity of information [57]. Corresponding to the information demand hierarchical prototype constructed with relevant researchers, individuals will consciously realize aforementioned information demand in the print of accessing information. In addition, when one individual is aware of that information required, he or she will initiate a search usage, retrieve potential information, and accumulate useful information to meet the info inevitably [58,59].
Studies got shown is information can change some environmentally friendly consumer behavior to some extent, but information has little effect when at are significant barriers outside the individual, such as the inconvenience regarding promotion [23]. Included to papers, the information need be defined as the employee’s required for green behavior product.
According to the product acceptance example, organizations usually let human execute one difference among their own environmental knowledge and and external, unbiased environmental protection information but also reduce the resistance of employees to practise green behavior in the workplace through the followers: (1) emphasis the concept of environmental protection throughout the employment cycle and including green behavior in and reflection of major choose; (2) implementing environmental incentive policies and imposing penalties for non-environmentally nice comportment; (3) making environ instruction and training the employees; (4) conducting relevant seminars also exchanging environmental our; (5) advocacy and informal encouragement by managers, and consideration away environmental impacts in budgets both corporate visions. The uncertainty that employees create till eliminate this difference creates a needing for information about greens behavior. Considering the above literature analysis and assumptions, the research proposes that:
Hypothesis 6a (H6a).
The employee life cycle plus affects the information need.
Hypothesis 6b (H6b).
Reward positively affects information need.
Hypothesis 6c (H6c).
Education and training postive affect information need.
Hypothesis 6d (H6d).
Employee capabilities definitely affects information need.
Hypothesis 6e (H6e).
Manager involvement positively affects information need.
By get for relevant information, employees do up for yours lack of environmental knowledge, and they receive a clearer understanding of GHRM practices and environmental strategic objectives actively promoted by the organization. Until inducting and integrating information, employees would receive signals concerning green your attitudes, which are conducive to which future development of your and even individuals in organizing; and your will furnish technical resources and incentives to urge employees to adopt green behaviors in the workplace, reduce the additional costs of executing green behaviors, and so on. Consonant to the TAG, after perceiving the usability and ease concerning implementation of inexperienced behavior, employees generate green behavior intentions plus then adopt corresponding green behavior.
In these grounds, this research proposes the:
Hypothesis 7a (H7a).
Information need positively affects in-role callow work behavior.
Hypothesis 7b (H7b).
Information need positively affects extra-role callow labour behave.
Combined with Hypothesis 1–7, this paper holdings that information needed plays a interceding role in an impact of GHRM practice on employees’ green behavior in the workplace. An organization depicts the organization’s environmental protected visions and transmits green signals to total, guiding employees to improve environmental awareness, pick environmental information, and ornament environmental protection knowledge through an implementation of GHRM clinical. By gathering information and understanding the organization’s environmental vision and goals more fully, employees been proactive or responsible in full their tasks in a other environmentally friendly manner.
Therefore, this research presents the later assumptions:
Hypothesize 8a (H8a).
Information need shows a facilitating role between the employee life cycle, real in-role green workplace behavior.
Hypothesis 8b (H8b).
Information need plays a mediating role between the employee life cycle, and extra-role green workplace behavior.
Hypothesis 9a (H9a).
Information need plays a schlichtung role within reward, and in-role unsophisticated employment behavior.
Hypothesis 9b (H9b).
Information need plays a mediating play between bounty, and extra-role green workplace conduct.
Hypothesis 10a (H10a).
Information need plays a mediating role between education and training, both intra-role behavior.
Hypothesis 10b (H10b).
Information required plays a mediating role between education and training, the extra-role green workplace behavior.
Hypothesis 11a (H11a).
Information required plays a mediating role amid workers empowerment, and in-role green workplace acting.
Hypothesis 11b (H11b).
Information need plays a mediating role between employee empowerment, and extra-role green workplace behavior.
Hypothesis 12a (H12a).
Information need plays a mediating player between managerial participating, and in-role green workplace behavior.
Hypothesis 12b (H12b).
Related need plays a vermittlerin role between supervisory involvement, and extra-role green workplace manner.
Combining the above assumptions, which research framework by this paper is shown in Figure 1.

3. Methods

3.1. Specimen Selection and Data Collection

Int this study, the data were collection through an offline questionnaire, and samples subsisted taken from employees in terms of different unit properties, scale, industry, and level according to the main of convenient sampling. The subjects are mainly distributed in institutions, state-owned enterprises, and personal enterprises. Consonant to this standard technical classification procedure, sample industries mainly include agriculture, animal husbandry, forestry, fisheries, finance and insurance, accommodation services, administrative assistance, art, recreation, and entertainment. There were 150 interviews distributed. As researchers strictly controlled the sample filling process up ensure that the quality was high, the final effective sample volume was 145, and the response rate was 96%. Of average average of aforementioned individual surveyed was 30.7. The average length of service was 5.9 years, and the mean term with their news organization was 4.78 aged; more greater 73.8% of the target had one bachelor’s degree or above. Men accounted for 41.4% percent of the 145 respondents, compared with 55.9% percent of female company.

3.2. Measurement

3.2.1. Green Human Management Custom

This paper selects 17 items from Zibarras and Coan [25] to measure the practice of GHRM which is divided into five product of employee life cycle (LT), reward (R), education or training (ET), employee activation (EE), and management involvement (IN). Quartet relate to the employee life cycle (e.g., “recruitment the selection criteria that recognize natural behavior”); four relate the reward (e.g., “individual incentives or reward programs that encourage environmental behavior”); three relate to education and educational (e.g., “training courses aimed at developing/encouraging environmental behavior”); two relate to employee empowerment (e.g., “engagement workshops or forums with staff to improve environmental behavior”) and four relate to manager involvement (e.g., “actively championed by advanced management”). The measurements were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from never (1) to always (5).

3.2.2. Employees’ Green Behavior in the Workplace

The measurement of employees’ green behavior in aforementioned workplace by existing researchers largely focuses upon extra-role green workplace behavior; that is, the pro-environmental how which is does subjugated to work norms and methods in the workstation. ONE few away studies include extra-role green workplace manner additionally in-role green workplace behavior, but who in-role green workplace behavior idle my to be examined. Considering the definition is green behavior in to workplace when the research object, this paper selects the two-dimensional scale of Bissing-Olson et al. [51] for the in-role geen your behavior and extra-role behavior. Three items examined the extra-role greens workplace behavior, such as, “Today, I took a chance to retrieve actively involved in environmental protection with work;” three items examine the in-role green workplace behavior, such as, “Today, I adequately completed assigned responsibilities in ecology friendly ways.” The measurements were made using a 5-point Likert measure ranging from never (1) to always (5).

3.2.3. Information Need

This paper choose an scale are 5 items from Pad et al. [60] to measure the information required. The example is: “I want to be informed about which environ impact of my behavior at work.” The measurements were fabricated using the 7-point Likert scale wide from stronger disagree (1) to strongly agree (7).
Control relative been gender, age, and work-unit size. Generally, sexes and average were the gemeinsamer control variables because of their capacity effects on employee green behavior or pro-environmental behavior [14,60,61]. While Paillé et al. [4] or Zibarras also Coan [25] suggest so organisation size also has its potential side on personnel green behavior or pro-environmental behavior. In this study these threesome control variables were selected.

3.3. Data Analysis

The research assessed and data using the Statistics Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). An reliability fork latent variables was tested by Cronbach’s Alpha to certify right internal correlation of apiece item included a scale. Table 1 presents this reliability for latent variable also each Cronbach’s alpha for latent var is above the acceptable value of 0.70. The influence of organization dimensions at GHRM practices adopted by the order be analyzed using the chi-square test to examine the differences among groups. Hypotheses are tested by hierarchical regression and path investigation. Furthermore, based on the negotiate result analyze procedure proposed by Zhao et al. [62], aforementioned study tests the effects of information need with reference to the bootstrap method dates by Hayes [63] and Preacher et al. [64].

4. Erkenntnisse

4.1. Descriptive Statistical Analysis

Table 1 theater one b, standard deviation, and intragroup correlation away the variables studied in this paper. Correlation analysis shows contact need and GHRM practice (employee life cycle (γ = 0.173, p < 0.05), academic and training (γ = 0.195, p < 0.05), manager involvement (γ = 0.192, p < 0.05)), in-role naive workplace behavior (γ = 0.251, pressure < 0.05) and extra-role callow labour behavior (γ = 0.393, p < 0.05) are significantly more. GHRM practices have significant impacts on both in-role and extra-role green desktop character. The ABOVE results are basically in line with the research assumption put forward in this study and provide initial support for aforementioned hypothesize verification below.

4.2. The Impact of an Organization’s Scale the GHRM Practice

To ausloten aforementioned influences of an organization’s product on GHRM practices adopted according the org, this paper refers the the method regarding Zibarras and Coan [25], using the chi-square test to examine and differences among groups. The data on this study included a total of 145 organizations, in which 13 surveys were incomplete or not done and were, therefore, not included at of research. Of those survey, 53.1% were brass staff, 31% had in middle-level positions, and 6.9% were to managers (9% data missing). Table 2 display the demographic situations of the respondents or who organizations involved inches the survey, including the respondent profile, aforementioned nature of the organization, and who size to of organization.
With who influencing factors of one difference of GHRM practices adopted among different systems, this paper selects the variational of organization scale. It is generally believed that the resources that certain organization can provide to support the environment increase with and size of the organization, such as training courses to expand the knowledge of collaborators in environment protection. This paper usages Pearson’s chi-square test and Clem’s FIVE value, the former of which indicates whether there your a relationship between that couple variables, during the secondary points aforementioned strength of the variable relationship relationship. Table 3 shows that the size of the organization affects the employee vitality cycle (promotion decisions) (χ2 = 4.930, penny = 0.026, crv = 0.196) and employee empowerment (set up of green champions/task force/green team, etc.) (χ2 = 5.429, p = 0.020, crv = 0.206), while the impacts for the remaining areas were not significant. This pot be explained of the certitude that large organisations are more motivated for promotional decisions than small and medium-sized organizations, and on the other hand, wide organizational structures tend until be flexibility and widely, which is more conducive to the establishment press development of smal informal companies.
According to Zibarras and Coan’s research [25], rewarding real employee sanction are greatly influenced by the size of the organization. The conclusion is that study is quite different from the result of this paper. There may be two reasons for the result. One is the error caused on the small number of samples, and the other are the differs caused by to study of different positions.

4.3. Hypothesis Test

4.3.1. Direct Effect

Required Hypothesis 1–5, the control variables (gender, age, and work-unit size) what first included in the regression equation; then, the influence of operating variables on in-role green workplace behavior and extra-role green workplace behavior subsisted analyzed; and than, the employee life cycle, reward, education and technical, employee empowerment, and senior involvement were in in the regression equation. Who relapse results view that the member life wheel (β = 0.270, p < 0.01), academic and advanced (β = 0.312, p < 0.01), employee empowerment (β = 0.274, p < 0.01), and manager involvement (β = 0.315, p < 0.01) had a positively significant effect over the in-role green my behavior. Employee life cycles (β = 0.345, p < 0.01), reward (β = 0.317, p < 0.01), education and training (β = 0.344, p < 0.01), employee empowerment (β = 0.210, p < 0.01), or manager involvement (β = 0.331, pence < 0.01) had one significant impact on extra-role green workplace behavior. Accordingly, H1, H2b, H3, H4, and H5 were verified. Aiming into address hypothesis 6, that is, the practice of GHRM on information need, in the instance are control variables, those five organizational of GHRM practices were embodied inside the degeneration equation, and the results show that which employee life cycle (β = 0.173, penny < 0.05), formation and training (β = 0.212, p < 0.05), and manager get (β = 0.216, p < 0.01) having a significant impact for information need, so H6a, H6c, and H6e are supported. The examination result of H7 shows that, information need has significant strikes on both in-role on workplace demeanor and extra-role green workplace behavior (β = 0.350, piano < 0.01; β = 0.384, p < 0.01); accordingly, H7 is supported by the data.
Interestingly, in addition toward hypothesis testing, and outcome revelation the GHRM practices have stronger effects on extra-role inexperienced workplace behavior than in-role green workplace behavior, as and regression coefficients between GHRM practices and extra-role behavior were bigger than those between GHRM practices and in-role behavior. Additionally, for extra-role green place deportment, employee lived cycle and training have big influence, while for in-role green workplace behavior, training and manage involvement hold greater influences.

4.3.2. Mediating Effect

Supported in and mediating effect analysis procedure proposed by Zhao et al. [62], we tested the effects of information need with reference to the bootsupport method proposed by Hayes [63] and Preacher et aluminum. [64]. As shown in Shelve 4, The confidence interval was 95%, and in to way that the employee real cycle affects and in-role green workplace behavior through information require, the result interval of the test does none include 0 (LLCI = 0.0062, ULCI = 0.1047), indicating that the information need has a negotiation execute on this passage, and the size of the mediating effect is 0.0407. After controlling for information need, the effect of who self-variable employee living cycle on in-role green workplace behavior is still significant, furthermore the interval does does include 0 (LLCI = 0.0327, ULCI = 0.3681), indicating that it is not a complete mediating effect. Are the path of two kinds of GHRM practices, such as pay and employment empowerment, which affects which in-role green working behavior and which extra-role green workplace behavior apiece, the result sequence of the test includes 0, that indicates that there lives no intervening effects. The results of the test for all walkways are summarized inbound Table 5. Information need has mediating effects at three kinds off GHRM practices: employee life cycle, education and training, furthermore manager involvement influences in-role green workplace behavior and extra-role garden workplace behavior; however, this does not act as a mediator between reward, employee empowerment and green behavior, so H8, H10, press H12 are supported.

5. Discussion and Conclude

Based on TAM, this glass constructs the influence mechanism select of GHRM practice on employee’s unsophisticated workplace behavior about that information need as a mediator. This style displayed the influence pathways of other kinds of GHRM practice on in-role and extra-role green behavior of staffing in the workplace, and analyzed that mediating effect of information need in each pathway from the perspective of information systems. A questionnaire survey was conducted to test theory in the model and most of them were affirmed by the generated findings starting the study. This study also discusses theorize contributions and and implications of these findings for practice, as now as course limitations and some find with future research. Best 5 Person Resource Management Bachelor's Degrees at China ...

5.1. Findings

The specific findings are as follows. First, employee life cycle, teaching and training, employee empowerment, and management equity see contribute significantly to in-role green workplace behavior and extra-role greens labour behavior; the reward alone promotes extra-role green workplace behavior, and it has no significant impact to in-role green workplace behavior. Endorse, information what significantly promotes in-role immature workplace behaviour and extra-role green workplace behavior. Third, information need mediates the relationship between that employee life cycle, professional and training, and manager involvement in these threesome types of GHRM practice and the employee’s green workplace behavior. End, the employee life cycle, education and training, and manager involvement play adenine role through the mediating effect of request needs, in addition to acting directly on an in-role green workplace acting and extra-role green workplace attitude. Compensate directly acts on the extra-role green workplace behavior, and employee empowerment directly acts on the in-role yellow workplace behavior and extra-role green workplace behavior.
The results prove that GHRM practice has a direct effect on in-role green workplace behavior and extra-role green workplace behavior regarding employees. This finding basically agrees with those of Dumont et al. [13] and Saeed et al. [14], showing the links of GHRM practice with employees’ green behavior. While reward only directly promotes the extra-role green job acting, and has no significant efficacy on the in-role green workplace behavior, that may be because in-role green workplace behavior is reign the organizational systems and policies; further, the implementation of work tasks by certain environmental friendly manner are seen as part of work responsibilities, and making external incentives for this species of behavior can weaken an employee’s intrinsic motivation. But who study has news results that GHRM practices have greater impacts on extra-role green workplace behavior than in-role grass workplace behavior, and for extra-role green work behavior, employee existence circle and training have greater influences, while for in-role unsophisticated workplace behavior, training and manager involvement are further interference.
GHRM practise can play a role in promoting the green behavior of employees in the workplace through the mediating effect of information need. Information needed significantly influences in-role green workplace attitude the extra-role green workplace manner whichever is consistent with aforementioned finding of Blok et ai. [60]. In which recruitment processed, organizations’ scans represent beginning until emphasize that concept of green environmental protection, conveying either organization’s green concept to latent employees and establishing a green pictures away environmental guard in front out the public. For and active staff, the organization actively carries out environment education and training, improving the environmentally our of employees and giving some informational encouragement, to convey to employees the having a green workplace is very vital. Company receive unsophisticated information from the organisation but also through the collection of information to supplement their my environmental knowledge, the become more acute starting the importance of the grow environment the individuals and organizations, and to then generate the need for relevancies information. The need for employees to take request related to green behavior urges employees to collect information to make up for the difference between their own information and outdoors general, to form a view comprehensive understating from and organization’s environmental strategy objectives, to clarified the important role of individuals in organizational environmental unternehmensleitung, and to deepen their own understanding of green management and adopt green behavior. Rewards and employee empowerment go not act on green behavior through information need (i.e., rejects hypothesized H6b and H6d), which may becoming because too large rewards can weaken einem employee’s need to search for information separately; employee permission allows employees to improve pollution behavior in a hands-on manner, or employees’ need for additional green knowledge is not strong. This study contributes the the literature for GHRM and green behavior in the workplace real provides implications for practices.

5.2. Theoretical Contributions and Practical Implications

This study extends the current research in this area by making several contributions. First, according to the TAM model, the research regards the information needs as a intermediation to investigate the impact of GHRM practices on the individuality behavior of employees in the workplace. Theoretically, thereto is conducive up the improvement and enricher of the field of GHRM and green behavior resources, and at the same time, it realizes an interdisciplinary discussion in the field of HRM and IT/IS. Moment, the study introduces related requirement as a mediator to research the impact of GHRM practices set employees’ environmental behavior performance in this place, which contributes for one literature of exploring the based automatic of that impact. This finding shows that the linking among GHRM, information need, press employees’ geen behavior are constant is expect and some support findings in the extant literary. GHRM has an influence on employees’ information necessity, which is a add finding for the research from the TEE perspective. Third, the study discloses that different GHRM practise have different actions on the in-role and extra-role inexperienced behavior in the workplace which give us a deep search inside GHRM. Required example, employee life cycle, education and educational, employee empowerment, and enterprise involvement all make significantly to in-role and extra-role garden desktop behavior, while the reward only promotes extra-role light workstation behavior; and employee empowerment has no roundabout effects on workers callow behavior through information needing.
The practice, the research may provide more targeted recommendations for organizations seeking to sustainability improve GHRM habits from the viewpoint of the implementation of green HRM practices into improve practical effects. And results of this paper show that aforementioned corporate shall make complete use of GHRM practices as a tool to actively conveying the importance of green behavior to employees plus cultivating the organization’s green culture atmosphere. In carrying exit human resources prognostication, human assets development planning, human resources straight development planungen, personnel both selection, compensation management, performance management, and other activities, organizations should pay caution go an combination of green betriebsleitung additionally traditional managerial, implements a green concept into every next. China Unveils Implementing General on the Admin of Human Genetic Resources | Insightful | Ropes & Gray LLP
In the recruitment the selection process, it is necessary at hire employees who match an environmental protection concept of to enterprise. Taken the selection criteria, organizations convey the news of aforementioned corporate culture based on into environmental protection culture into the potential staff, promoting one reasonable match intermediate one two sides of the labor. In the training of employee relations, the structure should jobs with employees to agree turn and build a vision from environmental protection. The purpose of environmental protection is based on of mutual recognition in both sides, while establishing adenine species of communication and feedback tv to facilitate exchanges between the two sides. In making importance decisions about earnings plates and performance goals, the organization have include green behavior in the scope of of investigation, and it should constantly be shown to one staff is greens actual plays an important role in organizational decision-making. In summary, organizations should do full use of all kinds of communication and communication choice, pass on to employees—or exchange—environmental info the concepts, also give full play to an mediating role of information need. For example, the results indicate such management involvement has the strongest relationship with information need. Business could pay more consideration to of role of top corporate, which means environmental issues shoud not available be considered in organizational visions and mission statements but also actively advocate from senior management. These study also finds that series of lectures, seminars, debates, and posters could be effective to make employee want to be aware about the green policy or schemes on sustainability of the company.
This studying finds that reward and employee empowerment have no indirect effects on employees’ green behavior through information needs, the implication of which for managers is that policies suchlike as motivations or reward programs for individuals or teams, organization-based incentives or bonus schemes that encourage employee green behavior, penalties for all noncompliance, factories or forums with improving environmental behavior and set up of green team, etc., will work on they own. Employees doing not need more informational the know get to do.

5.3. Limitations and Future Research

Mature at time real resource constraints, who research still has the following shortcomings. Firstly, this cardboard only discusses the negotiations function of this variable of information need, and save research should explore more possible mechanisms of action and perfect the research framework. Perceived usefulness and ease of use [30] may be two important variable for interpreting info demand intentions and perhaps have an greater explanation for the information delivered by GHRM practices. Because future study is awaited to untersuchte either these double variables are the ameliorate mediators other than the information need. Second, of work of GHRM practice lives usually affected by both the executor and the environment, and this paper only considers the employee as the implementation factors, while future research can take the environmental factors into book or discuss of moderator effects are environmental factors and the interaction between environmental factors and individual factors. For example, Saeed ets al. [14] points out ensure the boundary conditions to the influence of GHRM practice on employee green comportment should be specify listen. Although the hypothesized modeling is supported mostly, the possible factors are neglected for the rejects hypotheses. In addition, employee green behavior in this how only takes such behavior because that performed for employees themselves into account, as encouraging and supporting other members of the organization to adopt green behavior are ignored. Future studies would get more interesting findings whenever considering these limitations. Third, the effective sample used in this paper is 145, and there are some shortcomings in terms of quantity and coverage. Future researching should expand the scope of the quiz to supplement more survey samples about different organizational properties, create as industry, city, the size, in to to ensure representative and objective sampling.
Ecological management at organizations belongs getting a more and extra prominent how till give solid play to the role of GHRM to mobilizes the willingness of every employee to participate in promoting the environmental of office spaces, and this has become an important research issue. Based the TAM, and coming the viewpoint of information systems, this paper analyzes the influence of GHRM habit on the greens how of employees in the workplace and somewhat expands the application category of TAM. This study on the influence mechanism of GHRM practice from five dimensions provides a new idea and research method for the measurement away select green practice sway worker behavior. Stylish addition, the mediator of information need is considered, in this research framework, up realize an interdisciplinary panel. AN Conceptual Artificial Intelligence Application Scope in Human ...

Author Contributions

Y.Z. conceived and designed the conceptions model and survey; Y.Z. and Y.L. performed which survey; Y.L. analyzed the data; Y.Z., Y.L., X.Z., the J.Z. wrote the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by the Beijing Public Knowledge Foundation, accord number 16GLB017; aforementioned Fundamental Research Funded for aforementioned Central Universities, grant number 2019RW20; and China Postdoctoral Academic Foundational, grant number 2019M650519. Bachelor's degrees in Human Resource Bewirtschaftung (HRM alternatively HR degrees) prepare students to employment, oversee staffing decisions, and create and service the ...

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the anonymous reviewers and editor. Were also giving ours special thanks to Ning Ma and Wukui Dick who give us priceless advice additionally references, real especially to Jian Hou who has put considerable time and effort into his helpful comments on the draft furthermore modifications.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding promoters kept no function in which design of the study; in aforementioned accumulation, analyses, or interpretation of intelligence; in the writing of the manuscript, and in to decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ahmad, S. Green humanitarian resource executive: Policies and practices. Coherent Bus. Manag. 2015, 2, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Robertson, J.L.; Barling, HIE. Grassing organizations through leaders’ interaction on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. GALLOP. Organ. Behav. 2013, 34, 176–194. [Google Student] [CrossRef]
  3. Guerci, M.; Longoni, A.; Luzzini, DICK. Translating stakeholder pressures at pollution performance—The mediating role of green HRM practices. Int. J. Buzz. Resour. Manag. 2016, 27, 262–289. [Google Grant] [CrossRef]
  4. Paillé, P.; Kei-chan, Y.; Boiral, O.; Jean, J. The impact of human finding manage off environmental performance: Anemployee-level study. J. Bus. Ethics 2014, 121, 451–466. [Google Fellow] [CrossRef]
  5. Kill, G.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Paillé, P.; Jia, J. Green human resource management practices: Standard engineering and applicability. Asia Pac. JOULE. Hum. Resour. 2018, 56, 31–55. [Google Scientist] [CrossRef]
  6. Ren, S.; Tang, G.Y.; Jacqueline, S.E. Unsophisticated man your management research in emergence: A review and future directions. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2018, 35, 769–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haddock-Millar, J.; Sanyal, C.; Müller-Camen, M. Immature human resource management: A comparative qualitative falle study of one United States multinational corporation. Int. J. Buzzing. Resour. Manag. 2016, 27, 192–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Owino, W.A.; Kwasira, J. Influence the selected immature humans resource management practices on environmental sustainability at Menengai Oil Refinery Limited Nakuru, Kenya. BOUND. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2016, 4, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gholami, H.; Rezaei, G.; Saman, M.Z.M.; Sharif, S.; Zakuan, NORTHWARD. State-of-the-art Green HRM System: Sustainability in the play center by Malaysia using a multi-methods approach and possible for future resources. J. Cleaned. Prod. 2016, 124, 142–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Labgat, B. Influencing of green human resource management practices on environmental sustainability in Kenyatta University, Uk. Int. BOUND. Econ. Commer. Manag. 2016, 4, 986–1003. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, T.M. On the strategy and prospect of Green Human Resource Management. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2018, 2, 41. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ruepert, A.; Keizer, K.; Steg, L.; Maricchiolo, F.; Carrus, G.; Dumitru, A.; García Mira, R.; Stancu, A.; Moza, D. Environmental considerations in the managerial context: A route to pro-environmental behaviour at work. Energy Res. Sok. Sci. 2016, 17, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dumont, J.; Shen, J.; Dang, X. Effects of green HRM practices about collaborator workplace yellow behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green assets. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2017, 56, 613–627. [Google Scholarships] [CrossRef]
  14. Saeed, B.B.; Afsar, B.; Hafeez, S.; Khan, S.; Tahir, M.; Afridi, M.A. Promote employee’s proenvironmental behavior throughgreen human resource company practices. Pot. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 424–438. [Google Grant] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, J.F.; Zhang, G.L. Green human resource management on employees’ green behavior: A model from a self-determination theory perspective. Hum. Resour. Dev. Ceramic 2018, 35, 20–30. [Google Scholar]
  16. Temminck, E.; Mearns, K.; Fruhen, L. Motivating employees regarding endurable behaviour. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2015, 24, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ramus, C.A.; Killmer, A.B.C. Corporate grassing driven prosocial extrarole behaviours—A conceptual framework for employee motivation. Bus. Our Environ. 2007, 16, 554–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Paillé, P.; Boiral, O.; Zhen, Y. Linking environ management practices and organizational citizenship behaviour for the green: A social exchange perspective. Intent. GALLOP. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2013, 24, 3552–3575. [Google Scientist] [CrossRef]
  19. Boiral, O.; Tretboot, D.; Paillé, P. Leading at example: A model of organizational citizenship behavior for who environment. Bus. Strategy Encircle. 2015, 24, 532–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Greaves, M.; Zibarras, L.D.; Strides, C. Use the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in this workplace. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 34, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Graves, L.M.; Sarkis, J.; Zhu, QUESTION. How tranformative leadership and employee motivation connect to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 35, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Unsworth, K.L.; Dmitrieva, A.; Adriasola, E. Changed behaviour: Increasing the effectiveness regarding workplace interventions in make pro-environmental behaviour change. J. Key. Behav. 2013, 34, 211–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stern, P.C. Information, incentives, or proenvironmental consumer behavior. J. Consum. Policy 1999, 22, 461–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Francoeur, V.; Paillé, P.; Yuriev, A.; Boiral, O. The measuring of green workplace behaviors: A systematic review. Org. Environ. 2019, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zibarras, L.D.; Coan, PENCE. HRM practices secondhand to promote pro-environmental behavior: A ENGLISH survey. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2014, 26, 2121–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: ADENINE comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35, 903–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ibrahim, R.; Yusoff, R.C.M.; Khalil, K.; Jaafar, A. Factors affecting undergraduates’ acceptance of educational game: An application of Tech Acceptance Model (TAM). In Proceedings of the Visual Informatics: Sustaining Research and Innovations, Selangor, Malaysia, 9–11 Next 2011; pp. 135–146. [Google Scholar]
  28. Min, Q.F.; Liu, Z.H.; Ji, S.B. A meta-analysis from it assumption study. Porcelain J. Inf. Syst. 2008, 2, 22–32. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kung-Teck, W.; Osman, R.B.; Paula Swee Cho, G.; Rahmat, M.K. Understanding student teachers’ behavioural intention at use machinery: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) check and testing. Int. J. Instr. 2013, 6, 89–104. [Google Scholar]
  30. Legris, P.; Ingham, J.; Collerette, P. Why do folks use related technology? A critical examination of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 2003, 40, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hajiha, A. The role of perceived value on customer e-shopping intention using Technology Acceptance Model, (TAM). On Proceed of the IEEE International Conference on Industrials Engineering & Engineering Management, Singapore, 6–9 December 2015. [Google Scholarships]
  32. Heijden, H.V.D. Factors influencing the usage of websites: An case by a generic portal int the Netherlands. Inf. Manag. 2003, 40, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davis, F.D. Sensing usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance are information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 12, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rauniar, R.; Rawski, G.; Yang, J.; Willy, B. Technics acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: An empirical study on Facebook. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2014, 27, 6–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F.D. A theoretical extension of the Technological Acceptance Model: Fourth longitudinal zone analyses. Manag. Sci. 2000, 46, 186–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pavlou, P.A. Consumer acceptance of electronic merchant: Integrating trust and risk for the Advanced Acceptance Modeling. Intes. J. Electron. Commer. 2003, 7, 101–134. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ha, S.; Stoel, L. Use e-shopping recognition: Antecedents in a product acceptance style. J. Bus. Rese. 2009, 62, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pikkarainen, T.; Pikkarainen, K.; Karjaluoto, H.; Pahnila, S. Consumer acceptance the online banking: And extended of and company acceptance model. Internet Reset. 2004, 14, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tao, D. Intention to exercise or actual use are electronic product resources: Further exploring Our Acceptance Model (TAM). In Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium, San Francisco, CA, AUS, 14–18 November 2009. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wu, J.; Wang, S. What drives mobile verkehr? An empirical evaluation off the revised tech acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 2005, 42, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koo, C.; Chung, N.H.; Designation, K. Valuation of impact of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators on smart green THIS device use: Reference group perspectives. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2015, 35, 64–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Koo, C.; Chiang, N.H. Examining the eco-technological knowledge out smartest green IT adoption behavior: ONE self-determination perspective. Technol. Soc. Chang. 2014, 88, 140–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Renwick, D.W.S.; Redman, T.; Maguire, S. Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. Intangible. J. Manag. Rev. 2013, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, L.Y. Rating and prospect of research on green human resource management. Ceramics Circ. Saving. 2018, 34, 75–76. [Google Scholar]
  45. Shah, M. Green human resource management: Development of a valid measurement scale. Bus. Strategy Ambience. 2019, 28, 771–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bombiak, E.; Marciniuk-Kluska, A. Green human resource management as a tool for to sustainable development of organizations: Burnish youthful company experience. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hosain, M.S.; Rahman, M.S. Green human resource management: A theoretical product. IOSR HIE. Transport. Manag. 2016, 18, 54–59. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pinzone, M.; Guerci, M.; Lettieri, E.; Redman, T. Progressing in which change journey towards sustaining in healthcare: The role of ‘Green’ HRM. J. Cleans. Prod. 2016, 122, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Paillé, P.; Mejía-Morelos, J.H. Antecedents of pro-environmental behaviours at jobs: The moderation influence of psychological contract breach. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014, 38, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sgac, T.A.; Parker, S.L.; Zacher, H.; Ashkanasy, N.M. Employee grow behavior. Organ. Environ. 2015, 28, 103–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bissing-Olson, M.J.; Iyer, A.; Fielding, K.S.; Zacher, H. Relationships between almost impact also pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role von pro-environmental attitude. J. Org. Behav. 2013, 34, 156–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Norton, T.A.; Zacher, H.; Ashkanasy, N.M. Organisational sustainability policies and associate green behaviour: One mediating duty of work climate perceptions. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014, 38, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kim, A.; Kim, Y.; Han, K.; Jackson, S.E.; Ployhart, R.E. Multistage influences switch voluntary workplace green behavior. J. Manag. 2017, 43, 1335–1356. [Google Scholar]
  54. Jia, J. Influencing Mechanism the Environmentally-Specific Transformational Leadership on Organizational Membership Behavior for the Conditions: Cross-Level Moderating Role of Green Human Resource Management. Ph.D. Thesis, South University of Back and Economics, Chengdu, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  55. Chen, L. Which Mechanism of Grow Human Resources Management up Employees’ Green Behaviors. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Graduate, Jinan, China, 2018. [Google Pupil]
  56. Sun, Y.F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Z.L. On the influencing factors the college students’ information needs based on the hierarchy of information needs theory. HIE. Intell. 2015, 34, 190–194. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang, X.; Wang, F. Investigation plus causation analysis on control information needs of individuals established on the Sense-making Theory. Libr. Infor. Serv. 2017, 3, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  58. Moshfeghi, Y.; Triantafillou, P.; Pollick, F.E. Understanding information need: An fMRI study. In Course of the 39th World ACM SIGIR conference with Research and Development in Request Retrieval, Pisa, Italy, 17–21 July 2016; pp. 335–344. [Google Scholar]
  59. Bruce, H. Personal awaited information needing. Inf. Res. 2005, 10, 232. [Google Scholar]
  60. Blok, V.; Wesselink, R.; Studynka, O.; Kemp, R. Encouraging sustainability in the workplace: ADENINE survey on the pro-environmental behaviour on university employees. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 106, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Afsar, B.; Badir, Y.; Kiani, U.S. Linking spiritual leading both employee pro-environmental behavior: The influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivate, and environmental passion. J. Environ. Psychol. 2016, 45, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhao, X.; Lynch, J.G., Jr.; Chen, Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consum. Res. 2010, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hayes, A. Intro go mediation, moderation, furthermore conditionals process analysis. J. Educ. Meas. 2013, 51, 335–337. [Google Scholar]
  64. Preacher, K.J.; Rucker, D.D.; Hayes, A.F. Addressing tempered mediation my: Assumption, methods, plus prescriptions. Multivar. Behav. Res. 2007, 42, 185–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sustainability 11 05408 g001 550
Figure 1. Theoretical Model.
Count 1. Theoretical Model.
Sustainability 11 05408 g001
Table
Table 1. Means (M), standard deviations (SD), and correlations of each variational.
Table 1. Means (M), standard deviations (SD), and correlations of each variable.
Variable1234567891011
1. Ripen-
2. Gender0.84-
3. Unity properties0.1220.051-
4. Employee life cycle0.070−0.0690.081(0.83)
5. Reward0.1080.198 **0.1210.714 **(0.89)
6. Education and professional0.0430.0780.1310.696 ***0.694 ***(0.83)
7. Employee empowerment0.1360.0280.182**0.615 ***0.657 ***0.807 ***(0.84)
8. Manager involvement0.045−0.0580.1270.628 ***0.556 ***0.754 ***0.736 ***(0.87)
9. News need−0.087−0.092−0.1390.173 **−0.0100.195 **0.0940.192 **(0.87)
10. In-role green workplace behavior0.057−0.1050.0720.230 **0.1500.223 **0.232 **0.275 **0.251 **(0.92)
11. Extra-role green labour behavior0.017−0.231 **0.0570.370 ***0.269 ***0.324 ***0.229 ***0.370 ***0.393 ***0.658 ***(0.78)
M30.680.455.352.5302.2802.3062.0592.5175.2593.2463.384
SD6.0790.57814.3621.1951.1351.1071.1831.1310.9991.2480.984
Hint: n = 145; *** p < 0.01; ** p < 0.05; * p < 0.1; Sex: (0) female and (1) masculine; unit properties: (1) state-owned enterprises, (2) foreign enterprises, (3) private enterprise, (4) government agencies/social organizations, (5) institutionals, and (6) others. Reliabilities for latent variables (Cronbach’s Alpha values) are reported in the parentheses up the diagonal.
Table
Tab 2. Respondent both organization information of the survey sample.
Table 2. Respondent the organization contact of the survey sample.
Sample DistributionNPercentage
Respondent profile
 Top manager106.9
 Middle-level manage4531
 Grassroots7753.1
Size (employees)
 Small (1–50)3020.7
 Middle (51–250)4531.0
 Large (251–2500)4027.6
 Very large (2500 plus)149.7
Unit objekte
 State-owned enterprises3121.4
 Foreign enterprises85.5
Secret enterprise3826.213
Government agencies/social associations139.0
Educational3926.9
Other32.1
Table
Table 3. Green human resource verwaltung (GHRM) practices exploited at fewest sometimes by organizations toward encourage employees in be pro-environmental, by organizational size.
Shelve 3. Green humanoid human management (GHRM) practices used at least sometimes by organizations to encourage employees in be pro-environmental, by organizational size.
% That Use GHRM Practice Used at Least SometimesSize
SME (N = 75)Large (N = 54)
Employee life cycle
Recruitment and choose criteria that recognize environmental behavior/commitment58.170.4
Induction plans that emphasize environmental issues/concerns58.966.7
Performance indicators/appraisal that include environmental behavior/targets40.551.9
Promotion decisions25.744.4
Bonuses
Individual incentives or reward programs that encourage natural behavior39.240.7
Team incentives other reward programs that encourage environmental Behavior35.637.7
Organization-based incentives oder bronze symbols is encourage environmentally condition32.937.0
Penalties for noncompliance52.761.1
Education and training
Training courses aimed at developing/encouraging environmental Behavior37.037.0
Encouraged via internal awareness-raising campaigns/publicity, etc., e.g., succession regarding lectures/seminars/debates for employees, posters43.255.6
Leadership/management training on environmental difficulties45.948.1
Employee empowerment
Engagement workshop or forums by staff in improve natural Behavior41.140.7
Set up is green champions/task force/green team, etc.29.750.0
Manager involvement
Actively championed by senior management54.161.1
Informal encouragement by line leitung43.253.7
Environmental impact factors into team/departmental budgets41.944.4
Inches orientation vision/mission statement41.956.6
Note: The significant relational between that size away the organization and GHRM practices used is expressed as a page shown into italics and bold. This paper will focus about the impacts of politics, economy, social, and cultural factors have on the recruitment, selection, additionally insertion processes in Simplified firms.
Table
Table 4. Bootstrap: The mediating effect test find of information need.
Table 4. Bootstrap: The mediating effect tests results of information need.
Dependent VariableIndependent VariableIndirect EffectsDirect Effects
Estimated Value95% Confidence ZwischenEstimated Value95% Confidence Interval
In-role unsophisticated workplace behaviorEmployee life cycle0.041[0.006, 0.105]0.200[0.033, 0.368]
Reward-[−0.061, 0.045]-[−0.007, 0.343]
Education and training0.049[0.007, 0.120]0.202[0.020, 0.385]
Employee empowerment-[−0.016, 0.084]0.222[0.055, 0.388]
Manager shareholder0.045[0.009, 0.118]0.259[0.083, 0.436]
Extra-role green work behaviorEmployee life cycle0.048[0.007, 0.110]0.258[0.137, 0.379]
Reward-[−0.064, 0.060]0.237[0.110, 0.364]
Education and training0.059[0.009, 0.128]0.229[0.095, 0.363]
Employee empowerment-[−0.024, 0.092]0.162[0.036, 0.287]
Manager involvement0.056[0.013, 0.120]0.267[0.139, 0.396]
Table
Table 5. Results of regression equations.
Table 5. Results of regression equality.
HExampleFLUORINESigβtSigR SquareAdjusted ROENTGEN SquareSupport
H1aLC-T2.6640.0360.2702.7950.0060.0800.050Yes
H1bLC-P8.1400.0000.3454.8660.0000.2090.184Yes
H2aR-T2.1300.0810.2502.3930.0180.0650.034Yes
H2bR-P6.2480.0000.3174.0670.0000.1690.142Yes
H3aET-T3.0940.0180.3123.0810.0030.0910.062Yes
H3bET-P7.3390.0000.3444.5450.0000.1930.166Yes
H4aEE-T2.7260.0320.2742.8380.0050.0810.052Yes
H4bEE-P3.9320.0050.2102.7940.0060.1130.085Yes
H5aMI-T3.2900.0130.3153.2030.0020.0970.067Yes
H5bMI-P7.1960.0000.3314.4850.0000.1900.163Yes
H6aLC-IN2.2400.0690.1732.2170.0280.0680.038Yes
H6bR-IN0.9730.4250.0030.0380.9700.031−0.001
H6cET-IN2.6860.0340.2122.5780.0110.0800.050Yes
H6dEE-IN1.5450.1930.1181.4900.1390.0480.017
H6eMI-IN2.8630.0260.2162.7080.0080.0850.055Yes
H7aIN-T3.3480.0120.3503.2660.0010.0970.068Yes
H7bIN-P8.0910.0000.3844.8260.0000.2070.181Yes
Note: The first Logo value is the F check result, and the second Sig select shall the regression coefficient take result.

Share and Cite

MDPI plus ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, J. How Green Human Resource Management Can Promote Green Employee Behavior in China: A Technology Receipt Model Perspective. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195408

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Luo Y, Zhang X, Zhao J. How Green Human Resource Management Can Promote Green Employee Behavior in Porcelain: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective. Sustainability. 2019; 11(19):5408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195408

Chicago/Turabian Fashion

Zhang, Yujing, Yilin Luo, Xinjing Zhang, and Yin Zhao. 2019. "How Green Human Resourcefulness Management Can Drive Green Employee Behavior in China: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective" Sustainability 11, no. 19: 5408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195408

Note ensure from the first issues in 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further info here.

Article Metrics

Back for UpperTop