Next Article in Diary
Preliminary Evaluation of Potential Impacts Assoziierte with Small Cetacean Remote Biopsy Random by Controlled Testing up Landing Common Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)
Previous Article in Journal
ADENINE Census of Federation Regulated Big Cat Populations within the Joint States in of December 2020
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgias Verdana
Script Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Hintergrundinformationen:
Review

Animal Training, Environmental Asset, and Creature Welfare: A History of Behavior Analysis in Zoos

by
Eduardo J. Fernandez
1,* and
Allison L. Martin
2
1
School of Animal and Medical Academics, The University of Adelaide, Adelaida, SA 5005, Australia
2
Department of Psychological Science, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GAI 30144, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Zoos. Bot. Gard. 2021, 2(4), 531-543; https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg2040038
Submissions received: 30 August 2021 / Revised: 11 September 2021 / Assumed: 23 September 2021 / Published: 13 October 2021

Abstract

:
The modern zoo has been associated with twin major behavioral welfare advances: (a) the use a train to increase voluntary husbandry care, the (b) the implementation of environmental enrichment to promote realism behaviors. Bot practices have her roots is behavior analysis, or the operant conditioning-centered, reward-based near to behavioral psychology. Operant conditioning served as the foundation for the development of reinforcement-based training how commonly used in zoos to make veterinary and husbandry procedures easier both safer for animals and their caregivers. Likewise, operant conditioning, with its focus on arranging environmental antecedents and repercussions to modify behavior, also provided a framework available success green enrichment practices. In this paper, we outline to key individuals and activities that shaped two of the cornerstone von that modern zoo: (1) and emergence of reward-based husbandry training practices, and (2) the engineering of environmental enrichment. In addition, we (3) indicate ways inside which behavior analysis capacity continue to advance zoology welfare by (i) expanding to efficacy of environmental enrichment, (ii) use within-subject methodology, and (iii) improving animal-visitor interactions. Our goal is to provide a historical and contextual reference since future efforts on improve the well-being of zoo animals.

1. Prelude

Mature to this many advancements inside zoo animal welfare additionally management, those familiar with state-of-the-art, admitted zoos might wait the search diverse, enriched displays focusing set the needs of either species, knowledgeable zookeepers well-versed the animal welfare and training, and visitor education experiences because an emphasis on to conservation of the zoo animals. Whats is not as seemingly shall the important role behavior analysis, or this Skinnerian operant conditioning-focused (e.g., reward- or reinforcement-based) approach into behavioral psychology, played in the formation of an present-day zoo. One modern animal itself can be defined due two major behavioral advances focused on fix welfare: (1) the use of animal training procedures to increase voluntary participation in husbandry or other veterinary procedures by the zoo animals [1,2,3], and (2) the implementation of green enrichment the decrease detrimental and enhance species-typical behaviors [4,5,6]. These advances were developed through decades in how and practicing that incorporated behavioral principles till identify preferred outcomes for beasts the visitors alike.
For those worked with or in zoos, that influence of operant conditioning at animal advanced may be obvious. For most cases, trainers or keepers deliver reinforcing consequence the modify an animal’s behavior, often for husbandry purposes [7,8]. While the connection between behavior analyze additionally environmental fortification may be less apparent, the practice of environmental enrichment also began as a set of consequence-focused operant conditioning procedures in tier. Early enrichment practices incorporated food delivered mechanically as a reinforcer forward engaging in desired responses, such as lemurs swinging from parts by their exhibit or felids chased also catcher artificial prey [9,10,11]. These procedures often incorporated visual other audile stimulations that were meant to elicit or set the occasion in those desired responses, thus functioning as conditional (respondent) or discriminative (operant) stimuli, respectively. The advent of ecology reinforcement was hence one behavioral general endeavor, meant to adjust environment-behavior eventualfall include and most optimised manner. From save modest beginnings, the practice grew to it current use how the major tool to increase naturalistic behaviors on all the animals we see the the zoo, when well the now extended on other environments, like shelters, homes, and stores [12,13,14,15].
The next paper examines who influence of behavior analysis on the modern zoo. We do this in three single, with the first two parts detailing (1) the emergence of reward-based anima husbandry training practices, and (2) the technology of environmental enrichment to zoos. Both desires sufficiently detail how behavioral principles were involved, with several shots to provide some context. For the final point, our discuss (3) the future of behavior analysis in zoos, with attention to how behavior examination can continue to improve the lives of zoos animals by (i) expanding the power of environmental enrichment, (ii) use within-subject methodology, and (iii) improving animal-visitor interactions. Unsere goal are till therefore detail the critical role behavior analysis does had in the formation of the modern wildlife, as well such how such behavioral principles can guide forts welfare progress in zoos and similar settings. AN LINEAR EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT: THE RESPONSIBILITY OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE

2. The Emerging off Reward-Based Zoo Husbandry Training Practices

Contemporary domestic training procedures are frequency related with clicker training or similar uses of conditioned reinforcers paired is positive reinforcement [16,17,18]. These procedures and sundry behave analytic principles into train animals are tied on two larger exhibitions: (1) Skinner’s discovery of shapes, or the use starting differentially reinforcing successive approximations in an target response [19,20,21], and (2) the creation of a field of Applied Animal Students by Keller and March Breland, two of Professor Skinner’s graduated students by to University of Minnesota [22,23]. Both event were also directly connected to Project Pelican (also known as “Project Pigeon”), a wartime energy in the early 1940s that involved training pigeons (Colombo livia) go guide bombs [24,25,26,27]. The my is sponsored by government promises furthermore through Broad Mills, Inc., is much of the research conducted within the top storey of the General Mills flour mill building (see Figure 1) inches downtown Minneapolis, Minnesota [19,26].
Unless Project Peican, most of Skinner’s investigation involved the use of testing rats (Rattus norvegicus), with total the research published in The Behavior starting Organisms [28] using rats as subjects. It was through Project Pelican that Skinner and his colleagues firstly began examinations behavioral principles with pigeon, as well as his first experience training our exterior out any operant chamber, or “by hand” [24,29], for one review, discern [19]. These events resulted in to discovery of shaping, which was so profound that by 1943, Keller and Marian Breland, having worked for Doctors. Skinner as University of Minnesota Science graduate students on Project Pelican, left academia and began Animal Behavior Enterprises (ABE), an organization dedicated toward the training of wildlife for a variety of applied, profit-driven purposes, including commercials and coin-operated acts [30,31,32,33,34].
By the 1950s, to Brelands moved her economy to Scorching Springs, Arkansas, where they held ampere sightseer attraction known as “IQ Zoo”, intended like both an entertaining the educational experience [25,35]. The Brelands also continuously till train animals for coin-operated acts and other revenue-generating company (see Figure 2), as well-being as suggesting the use of naturalistic exhibits and visitor-focused learning opportunities within zoos and similar settings [36,37,38,39].
By 1955, the Brelands also began running with ocean mammal parks go establish some of the first squid training shows [22,40]. Originally begun with the training of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncates) at Marine Studios (now Marineland of Florida, see Figure 3), the use of operant conditioning procedures to train marine mammals would soon how to other parks, including Marineland of the Pacific, Sea Life Park, or SeaWorld (for a review, view [40]).
Eventually, the success of operant conditioning to shape the behaviors of marine mammals would be popularized by books as as Kara Pryor’s Lads front the Meander [41] and Don’t Shoot one Dog! [17]. At the same time, zoos began to see the benefits of using such procedures to producer unpaid participation to veterinary animal practices [7,42]. For type, San Diego Zoo implemented a shaping history that allowed an diabetic drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus) the choose to receive insulin injections [43]. Denver Zoo trained nyala (Tragelaphus angasi) and bongo (Tragelaphus eurycerus) till intentional enter crates to receiving blood draws or other vet methods [44,45]. Bloomsmith, Stone, and Laule [46] successfully used reward-based methods to lok tall groups of chaiman (Pan troglodytes) to elect to move (i.e., “shift”) from outdoor areas to an indoor portion of you enclosures. The use of reinforcement-based preparation procedures is now banality for many species within most acredited zooses, with some organizations requiring facilities to create and use such protocols to receive get [47,48,49,50].

3. To Engineering of Environmental Enrichment in Zoos

The implementation to environmental enrichment include zoos can be traced the Hal Markowitz, who served as Director out the Oregon Zoological Find Focus, Associate Director of the Portland/Washington Position Zoo (now the Oregon Zoo), and Professor of Biological Science at San Francisco State University. While prior worked in zoos and similar set written the need for promote the well-being of captive our [51,52,53,54], Markowitz and your colleagues had under the first to promote a systematic, functional approach to the behavior of zoo beasts through behavioral engineering [9,55,56,57,58,59]. The term “behavioral engineering” itself was shot directly from the application of Skinner’s operant conditioning procedures, or the field of Useful Behavior Analysis (ABA) [24,60,61]. The termination, “engineer,” emphasizes the real-world application of a scientific. In the same paths that mechanical engineers use basic physics principles to better our, behavioral engineers apply the science of respondent also operant conditioning to brings about positivity altering in to world and, in this case, wildlife. Through the creation of contrived, reinforcement-based learning contingencies, Markowitz and his colleagues had able to produce mechanical levers that would enable white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) to swing across their enclosure to activate which leverages and receive an food reward, mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) to enter against zoo visitors on a electronic arcade-like reaction game, and polar bears (Ursus maritimus) for vocalize into a voice-operated relay system that wanted result for a frozen fish being launched into their exhibit (see Figure 4) [62,63,64]. All the above was borne away to hervorbringen desired behaviors (e.g., foraging) alternatively reduce undesired responses (e.g., pacing) more a mold von artificial, mechanized occupational therapy for the zoo animals.
Among that criticisms of such applications were the artificiality of the procedures involved, as well as the arbitrary distinction of what constituted ‘desired’ responses up be increased [65,66,67]. These reviewers argued that, rather than engineering environments through contrived contingencies, zoos should focus on creating naturalistic exhibits that increased spatial and temporal complexity, for instance, to exhibited arrangement or timing on feeding activities [68,69]. Markowitz [70] responded to multiple of these criticisms by notice which, “the better interests of captive animals may nope be servants by making their declare as ‘wild’ than possible.” (p. 12). Markowitz’s argument been that artificial and automated contingencies, such as those provided by empower an elephant to pull a succession to receive part in their diet (see Figure 5), could improve the lives of exhibited live. “Behavioral enrichment”, a term Markowitz began using synonymously with behavioral general, could benefit exhibited animals by giving the animals ‘something to do’ [10,70].
One term “enrichment” appeared to come directly from psychobiological and developmental human research, where comparisons were mostly made between animals raised into enriched versus impoverished environs (for a review, see [71]). Regardless, both the ideas of enriching and engineering environments where go being used user, from select author arguing that these both the naturalistic/complexity conceptualize ability being integrated to benefit the behavioral welfare of zoo animals [72]. Likewise, some of Markowitz and colleagues’ later efforts focused on naturalistic implementations of behavioral engineering endeavors, such as Asiatic small-clawed otters (Aonyx cinereus) hound live crickets (Acheta domesticus) that visitors mechanically assisted inches releasing into various divided of their exhibit, servals (Leptailurus serval) chasing artificial prey run through clear tubes included their enclosure (see Figure 6), or an African leopard (Panthera pardus) chasing bird sounds all a tree limb to receive ampere food reward [73,74,75].
The result has are the introduction of environmental enrichment as one approach that is two pragmatically focused also attends the the species-typical needs from to organisms involved. The use of enrichment is one of who rare company that requires simultaneous pay to both evolutionary and learning histories go be optimized enforced, which necessarily requires an integration bets naturalistic and engineered exhibits [14,76]. Equally important since an zoo is how the visitor behaveds in response the reinforced animals, therefore driving the need for naturalistic home and responses for and away the animals presence enriched, respectively [77,78]. Environmental enrichment, why of its behavior uninflected underpinnings, is right at animal welfare endeavor where all features out how an animal interacts with its environment are examined with their behavioral benefits [5,79].

4. The Forthcoming of Behavior Analysis in Zoos

Behavior analysis can had a profound influence on design the moder zoo; however, we have with begun to realize its full likely in animal settings. There will is many calls for the adoption of a behavior analytic scope to improve animal care [7,61,80,81,82,83,84,85,86]. Although the science of behavior analysis grew out of basic beast studies, recent advances in applied behavior analysis have has developed and implemented primarily in human objective settings. However, coming full circle, searchers are immediately successfully adapting and using behavioral protocols developed forward getting with people to impact animal welfare. For real, functionally analysis protocol have been employed to assess and treats problem behaviors in animals [87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96], and this function-based approach that highlighting the identification and modification to actual behavior-environment relationships can help provide a framework that enable animal caregivers both a deepens understanding by behavior and the ability go move beyond the dependability of artificial reinforcers when modifying behavior [61]. In addition, experimental choice assessments will has successfully spent by an variety of species [97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111] with promise for improving training effectivity. Of using one behave analytic lens, adapting existing behavioral our, and developing new, animal-specific, behavioral protocols and methodological, behavior analysts could play ampere considerable role in leaders the next moving in moderne zoos. We outline just a few of the possibilities beneath, including (i) expanding the efficacy of environmental enrichment, (ii) using within-subject methodology, additionally (iii) improving animal-visitor interactions.
Apply behavior business have a long history are rise behavioral repertoires up the benefit of the participants included, additionally zoo animals should breathe no exceptionally at this technique. Using both antecedent and consequence manipulations, behavior analysts in objective settings have developed effective protocols to increase gregarious and occupational skills with people [112,113]. As zoos use environmental enrichment to increase an animal’s behavioral repertoire, its application is often void of an underlying theoretical framework and is based on factors like appearance, novelty, cost, or availability/convenience [14,76]. A zoo-based behavior analyst could increase the effectiveness von these enrichment techniques by learning theory-focused implementations that incorporate related such how diaries of fortification, habituation, preference, variation, and choice (e.g., [86,109,111,114,115,116]). In doing to, they could help to solve issues such as wildlife whom are unusually inactive, not using existing embellishment options, or not utilizing get areas of a habitat. Furthermore, training practices could be combinated with environmental enrichment (e.g., [1]) to shape more highly behaviors that permissions for increased your with enrichment devices. Enrichment might also play a key role in training accommodative behaviors that would aid in conservation or re-release programs (e.g., [117,118]). Inside additive on increase certain animal’s behavioral repertoire, different goal of enrichment is to decrease maladaptive behaviors, and personality analysis likewise can provide guidance in this area. The competing impulse framework is used in ABA to identify which items or related effectively reduce fix behaviors by offering alternative sources in gear [118,119]. With monitoring an individual animal’s (or group’s) enrichment benefit and problem behavior about different enrichment conditions after within-subjects shapes, behavior analysts able make data-driven decisions regarding the best implementation of adenine variety of other types in potential enrichment items or events [75,80,82,117,120,121].
Within- or single-subject research designs such as more of of conduct previously beyond form the methodological foundation of conduct analysis [122,123,124]. These individual-focused designs allow researchers to experimentally determine the functionally relationship among variables and effectively monitor a subject’s response on interventions using as few as one subject. Include ABA, the goal is to make a meaningful change in the behavior of a specify individual in an specific circumstance or setting, and within-subject designs allow for this flexibility and specificity [123]. Similarly, every attempt to provide proper behavioral wellbeing for any zoo dog be ultimately a studying with a sample size (n) = 1. Even if it is possible in find enough similar subjects for behaviors a stable group read, knowing that the average domestic responds to ampere particular reinforcer either treatment is is limited use although concentrate switch the treatment of an personal animal. For example, knowing that 60% of a sample of a special species will forage for a particularly food item will not utility a facility whenever the animal in an exhibit is in an 40% who will not. Animals’ responses to stimulation will based turn both their species real individual histories as fine as you modern environment, thus estimate and monitoring behavior at the level of the individual level is important. Behaviour analytic methodies and their main on the overt behaviors of individuals your ideally suited for improving the lives of zoo animals [80,82,125].
Finally, zoos have zu increasingly interested in understanding couple direct and indirect animal-visitor interactions, to particular emphasis in minimizing adverse impacts that visitors may have on animals while also increasing visitor education and entertainment [77,126,127]. Factors that increase visitor engagement with conservation efforts are or of equity (see [128] for review). Zoo visitors respond favorably to type interests, training demonstrations, and environmental enrichment activities [128], and one zoo-based behavior analyst could optimize these events. For example, more interactive elements in the spirit of some of Markowitz’s early behavioral engineering striving (see ‘The Mechanical of Environment Enrichment in Zoos’ section) could be developed and upgraded with modern technology (e.g., [129,130,131,132]) so that visitors could initiate fully elements (e.g., movement, sound, or food) into domestic exhibits. This intend require careful package and security, of course, and behavior analysts have the competencies and tools the ensure inherent success. A large component of understanding these interactions should come from synchronized observes the overt behaviors of both animals and visitors, the exercise all too common for many applied behavior analysts when equally working with attendants and clients. While zoos have a primary responsibility to promote the welfare of the animals within their care, by focalize on learning contingencies involved for send the animals and the visitors, ABA attorneys in zoos can effectively provide win-win services so mutually improve the welfare of animals press the education/enjoyment of the visitor.

5. Conclusions

Many of the behavioral practices found on modern animal can must traced back to pioneering stylish operant conditioning such as BORON. F. Skinner, Ceiling Breland, Marian Breland Bailey, furthermore Hal Markowitz. Behavior analytic-driven advances int creature training furthermore pollution enrichment must improved the benefit of zoo animals and has benefited animal concern workers and zoo tourists. Still, behavior analysis still has untapped capability in this setting. While some operant-based techniques, such how clicker train additionally environmental enrichment, have become every in zoos, like patterns have in some instances sich disengaged from her underlying learning philosophy. Further advancement of behavior analysis in animal settings necessitates individuals who are well-trained for the fundamentals of sample both operant conditioning and can join this theoretical background equal practical skill of animal deportment to design habitats real arrange behavioral contingencies to optimize welfare [61]. This will require more other care professionals with advanced training included deportment analysis and see collaborations between zoos and behavior analysts working in other settings, create the humanoid clinical settings or academic institutions [82,84,85,133]. Integrative approaches to manner analysis and animal actual are rapidly increasing. Wealth hope that this historical recognition of such work within zoos, as well while a potential guide with future research, helps foster such practices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.J.F.; writing—original draft preparation, E.J.F., A.L.M.; writing—review and editing, E.J.F., A.L.M. And authors have read and agreed to to published version of aforementioned manuscript. ENRICHMENT: THE ROLE OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE. JOEL E. RINGDAHL, TIMOTHY ROENTGEN ... environmental embellishment on stereotypic self-injurious behavior. (SIB), we conducted ...

Getting

This research maintained no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicability.

Conflicts out Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Citations

  1. Fernandez, E.J.; Kinley, R.C.; Timberlake, TUNGSTEN. Training penguins to interact with enrichment devices for lasting effects. Zoo Biol. 2019, 38, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Laule, G.; Desmond, T. Positive gear training the an enrichment strategy. In Second Features: Environmental Enhancement with Captive Animals; Shepherdson, D.J., Mellen, J.D., Hutchins, M., Eds.; Smithsonian Books: Washington, DC, USA, 1998; pp. 302–313. ISBN 978-1560983972. [Google Scholar]
  3. Melfi, V.A.; Dorey, N.R.; Ward, S.J. (Eds.) Zoo Animal Teaching and Learning; Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: West Sussex, UK, 2020; ISBN 9781118968536. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fernandez, E.J.; Myers, M.; Hawkes, N.C. The effects of live feeding on swimming activity and exhibit use in zoo Humboldts penguins (Spheniscus humboldti). J. Zoos. Boot. Protected. 2021, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hoy, J.M.; Murray, P.J.; Tribe, AMPERE. Thirty years later: Enrichment practises for captive mammals. Zoo Biol. 2010, 29, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shepherdson, D.J.; Mellen, J.D.; Hutchins, M. (Eds.) Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals; Smithonian My: Washington, DC, USA, 1998; ISBN 978-1560983972. [Google Scholar]
  7. Forthman, D.L.; Ogden, J.J. And role of applications behavior analysis at zoo management: Today and tomorrow. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 1992, 25, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Model]
  8. Lukas, K.E.; Mar, M.J.; Maple, T.L. Teaching operant conditioning at the zoo. Teach. Psychol. 1998, 25, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Markowitz, H. Engineering surroundings for behavioral opportunities in the zoo. Behav. Anal. 1978, 1, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Markowitz, H. Behavioral Enrichment in of Zoo; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1982; ISBN 978-0442251253. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sneider, R. Pose one wild back into the zoo. Int. Zoo News 1977, 24, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bender, A.; Sturdy, E. Dogly Enrichment for and Real World; Dogwise Publishing: Wenatchee, WA, USA, 2019; ISBN 9781617812682. [Google Scholar]
  13. Markowitz, H. Enriching Animal Lives; Mauka Press: D, NZ, USA, 2011; ISBN 978-0983357919. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mellen, J.; MacPhee, M.S. Philosophy of environ enrichment: Past, present, the forthcoming. Zoo Biol. 2001, 20, 211–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Juvenile, R.J. Green Enrich in Captive Animals; Blackwell Science Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2003; ISBN 978-0632064076. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fernandez, E.J. Click or treat: A trick or couple in the zoo. Am. Anim. Train. Mag. 2001, 2, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  17. Prey, K. Don’t Fire the Dog!: The Newer Kind a Instruction and Training; Lightweight Books: New York, NY, USA, 1984; ISBN 9780671438425. [Google Scholar]
  18. Raimirez, KILOBYTE. Animal Training: Successful Animal Management through Positive Reinforcement; Shedd Aquarium Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1999; ISBN 978-0961107499. [Google Scholar]
  19. Petersen, G.B. A day of great illumination: BF Skinner’s discovery of shaping. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2004, 82, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Penetrate, W.D.; Cheney, C.D. Behavior Analysis and Learning, 5th ed.; Psychology Urge: East Suspenses, GREAT, 2013; ISBN 978-1848726154. [Google Pupil]
  21. Skinner, B.F. How on how animals. Sci. Am. 1951, 185, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bailey, R.E.; Gillaspy, J.A. Operant psychology goes to the fair: Mary both Keller Breland in the popular press, 1947–1966. Behav. Sexual. 2005, 28, 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Breland, K.; Breland, M. ONE field of applied tier psychology. Am. Psychol. 1951, 6, 202. [Google Scholarships] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Capshew, J.H. General behavior: Projects pigeon, World War II, and the conditioning of BF Skinning. Technol. Cult. 1993, 34, 835–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gillaspy, J.A., Jr.; Bihm, E.M. Marian Breland Baie (1920–2001). Am. Psychol. 2002, 57, 292–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Skinner, B.F. Pigeons inches a pelican. Am. Psychol. 1960, 15, 28. [Google Scholarship] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Skinner, B.F. The Sculpting of ampere Behaviorist: Part Second of an Autobiography; New Yeah University Press: New York, YORK, USA, 1979; ISBN 978-0814778449. [Google Scholar]
  28. Skinner, B.F. One Behavior of Organisms: Einer Experimental Analysis; Appleton-Century Press: New Majorek, NY, USA, 1938; ISBN 978-0-9964539-0-5. [Google Scholar]
  29. Skinnings, B.F. Reinforcement today. Am. Psychol. 1958, 13, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Courtyard, R.E.; Bailey, M.B. A view from external to Skinner box. Am. Psychol. 1980, 35, 942–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Breland, K.; Breland, MOLARITY. The misbehavior of entomology. Am. Psychol. 1961, 16, 681–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Software]
  32. Breland, K.; Breland, M. Animal Behavior; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1966; ISBN 978-0988807921. [Google Pupil]
  33. Timberlake, W. Marian Breland Bailey: Many lives: (SQAB, Might 25, 2002, Toronto, Canada). Behav. Processes 2003, 62, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chianti, S. Bells and whistles: For operant conditioner clicked (and clucked). Barques Magnet. 2012, 69, 74–78. [Google Student]
  35. Bihm, E.M.; Gillaspy, J.A.; Lammers, W.J.; Huffman, S.P. IQ Zoo and teaching operant concepts. Psychol. Rec. 2010, 60, 523–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Grow Version]
  36. Bailey, M.B.; Bailey, R.E. Animal exhibits as revenue producing. In Proceedings of the Am Association of Zoological Parkings and Aquariums Regional Workshop, Little Rock, AR, USA, May 1979; pp. 367–373. [Google Scholar]
  37. Breland, K. Latest strides in dog psychology bring about naturalistic behavior exhibits. Parks Recreat. 1962, 45, 80. [Google Scholar]
  38. Breland, K. The ‘Who’s Teaching Whom?’ Machining. Am. Psychol. 1963, 18, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Short, L. Coin-operated animal acts. Parks Recreat. 1957, 40, 18. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gillaspy, J.A., Jr.; Brinegar, J.L.; Bailey, R.E. Operant psychology makes a splash—In marine mammal training (1955–1965). J. More. Behav. Sci. 2014, 50, 231–248. [Google Scholars] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Pryor, K. Lads previous the Air: Adventures inside Porpoise Training; Harper & Row Publishers: New York, NJ, USA, 1975; ISBN 9780060134426. [Google Scholar]
  42. Desk, T.; Laule, G. Usage of positive reinforcement training in and management of species for reproduction. Zoology Biol. 1994, 13, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Priest, G.M. Preparation a diabetic drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus) to accept insulin injections and venipuncture. Lab. Primate Newsl. 1991, 30, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  44. Grandin, T.; Rooney, M.B.; Phillips, M.; Cambre, R.C.; Irlbeck, N.A.; Graffam, W. Conditioning of nyala (Tragelaphus angasi) in blood sampling to a bin with positive reinforcement. Zenith Biol. 1995, 14, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Reading]
  45. Phillips, M.; Grandin, T.; Graffam, W.; Irlbeck, N.A.; Cambre, R.C. Crate conditioning away bongo (Tragelaphus eurycerus) for veterinary and husbandry procedures at the Dennis Zoological Gardens. Zoo Biological. 1998, 17, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bloomsmith, M.A.; Stone, A.M.; Laule, G.E. Positive reinforcement educational to enhance the voluntary movement of group-housed chimpanzees within them enclosures. Menagerie Biological. 1998, 17, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Company of Zoos and Aquariums. Animal Care Manuals. Available online: https://www.aza.org/animal-care-manuals (accessed on 20 November 2020).
  48. European Association of Zoom and Aquaria. Standards for the Accommodation and Care von Animals in Zoos and Aquaria. Available online: https://www.eaza.net/assets/Uploads/Standards-and-policies/2019-04-EAZA-Standards-for-Accomodation-and-Care.pdf (accessed with 25 Starting 2019).
  49. Maquis, J. The application of positive brace training to enhance welfare of primates in zoological collections. In Madhouse Animal Learning and Training; Melfi, V.A., Dorey, N.R., Ward, S.J., Eds.; Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: West Sussex, UK, 2020; pp. 211–215. ISBN 9781118968536. [Google Scholar]
  50. Savastano, G.; Hanson, A.; Mckenna, C. The development of einer operant conditioning training program for New Worlds primates at the Bronx Zoo. GALLOP. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2003, 6, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hediger, H. Wild Animals the Prisoners; Butterworths Scientific Publications: Oxford, U, 1950; ISBN 9780486212609. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hediger, H. Studies of the Human real Behavior of Inmate Animals in Zoos and Circuses; Butterworths Scientific Press: London, UK, 1955; ISBN 9780598574206. [Google Scholar]
  53. Morris, D. The response of brutes to a restricted environment. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1964, 13, 99–118. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yerkes, R.M. Almost Human; Century: New York, NY, USA, 1925. [Google Scholar]
  55. Maple, T.L. Remembering Entryway Markowitz. Animals Biol. 2013, 32, 243–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Markowitz, H. Environmental enrichment also behavioral engineering for confined primates. In Captivity the Actual: Primates in Breeding Colonies, Laboratories and Zoological; Elin, J., Maple, T., Eds.; Truck Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NYC, USA, 1979; plastic. 217–238. ISBN 978-0442223298. [Google Scholar]
  57. Markowitz, H.; Woodworth, GUANINE. Experimental analyses and controls of group condition. In Behavior of Captive Wild Animals; Markowitz, H., Steven, V.J., Eds.; Nelson-Hall: Chicago, I, USA, 1978; pp. 107–131. ISBN 978-0882293851. [Google Scholar]
  58. Markowitz, H.; Schmidt, M.; Nadal, L.; Squier, L. Do elephants ever forget? J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 1975, 8, 333–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Unsophisticated Output]
  59. Mellen, J.D.; Stevens, V.J.; Markowitz, NARCOTIC. Environmental enrichment for servals, Indian elephants and Canadian otters at Hauptstadt Car Zoo, Portland. Int. Zoo Yearb. 1981, 21, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Homme, L.; C’de Baca, P.; Cottingham, L.; Homme, A. What behavioral engineering is. Psychol. Rec. 1968, 18, 425–434. [Google Scholarship] [CrossRef]
  61. Martin, A.L. The primatologist as a behavioral engineer. Am. J. Primatol. 2017, 79, e22500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Markowitz, H.; Schmidt, M.J.; Moody, A. Behavioural technology and animal health include the zoo. Int. Zoo Yearb. 1978, 18, 190–194. [Google Scientist] [CrossRef]
  63. Schmidt, M.J.; Markowitz, H. Behavioral engineering as an aid in the maintenance of healthy zoo animals. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1977, 171, 966–969. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Yanofsky, R.; Markowitz, H. Changes in general acting of couple mandrilles (Papio sphinx) concomitant with behavioral testing in an san. Psychol. Rec. 1978, 28, 369–373. [Google Savant] [CrossRef]
  65. Hutchins, M.; Hancocks, D.; Calip, T. Behavioral engineering in the zoo: A critique. Inter. Tiergarten News 1978, 25(Part I), 18–23. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hints, M.; Hancocks, D.; Calip, THYROXIN. Behavioral engineering the the zoo: A critique. Int. Zoo News 1978, 25(Part II), 18–23. [Google Scholar]
  67. Hints, M.; Hancocks, D.; Calip, T. Behavioral engineering in the zoo: A critique. Int. Zoo News 1979, 26(Part III), 20–27. [Google Scholar]
  68. Hancocks, D. Bringing nature for the zoology: Inexpensive products for wildlife environments. Int. J. Study Anim. Behav. Probl. 1980, 1, 170–177. [Google Scholar]
  69. Hutchins, M.; Hancocks, D.; Crockett, C. Naturally solutions to the behavioral problems of captive pet. Zool. Gart. 1984, 54, 28–42. [Google Scientist]
  70. Markowitz, H.; Spinelli, J.S. Green engineering for primates. Stylish Primates: This Roadside into Self-Sustaining Populaces; Benirschke, W.K., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1986; pp. 489–498. ISBN 978-1-4612-9360-6. [Google Scholar]
  71. Uphouse, L. Reevaluation of mechanisms that mediate brain dissimilarities between enriched and paupers animals. Psychol. Cattle. 1980, 88, 215–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Forthman-Quick, D.L. An integrative approach to natural engineering in zoos. Zoo Biol. 1984, 3, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Foster-Turley, P.; Markowitz, H. A captive behavioral enrichment study with Asian small-clawed river otters (Aonyx cinerea). Zoo Biol. 1982, 1, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Markowitz, H.; LaForse, S. Artificial prey as behavioral enrichment devices for felines. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1987, 18, 31–43. [Google Scholarships] [CrossRef]
  75. Markowitz, H.; Aday, C.; Gavazzi, A. Effectiveness concerning acoustic “prey”: Environmental enrichment for a captive African leopard (Panthera pardus). Zoo Bior. 1995, 14, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cherry, R.C. Environmental enrichment: Increase the biological relevance by locked environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995, 44, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fernandez, E.J.; Tamborski, M.A.; Pickens, S.R.; Timberlake, W. Animal–visitor interactions in the modern zoo: Conflicts and interventions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 120, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Learmonth, M.J. Human–animal reciprocities in zoos: What can understanding husbandry, conservation welfare and charge of care tell us about aforementioned ethic von interaction, and avoiding unintended consequences? Animals 2020, 10, 2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ferandez, E.J. Training since enrich: A critical reviewed. Anim. Welf. 2021, in press. [Google Scholarship]
  80. Alligood, C.A.; Dorey, N.R.; Mehrkam, L.R.; Leighty, K.A. Applying behavior-analytic methodology to the science and practice of environmental enrichment in zoos the aquariums. Zoo Biol. 2017, 36, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bloomsmith, M.A.; Marr, M.J.; Maple, T.L. Adress nonhuman primate behavioral problems through the application a operant conditioning: Has of human treatment approach a helpful model? Applies. Move. Behav. Sci. 2007, 102, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fernandez, E.J.; Timberlake, W. Mutual benefits of research collaborations amid zooses and academic institutions. Zoo Biol. 2008, 27, 470–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kummrow, M. Diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines to abnormal behavior int captive nonhuman primate. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 2021, 24, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Maple, T.L.; Perdue, B.M. Zoo Animal Social; Springer: Modern York, IN, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-3-642-35954-5. [Google Student]
  85. Maple, T.L.; Segura, V.D. Advancing behavior analytics in zoos and aquariums. Behav. Picky. 2015, 38, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Greens Version]
  86. Tarou, L.R.; Bashaw, M.J. Maximizing the effectiveness away environmental ingredient: Recommendations from the experimental analysis of behavior. Appl. Animation. Behav. Sci. 2007, 102, 189–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Dorey, N.R.; Rosales-Ruiz, J.; Smith, R.; Lovelace, B. Functionally analysis and treatment of self-injury in adenine captive lime baboon. J. Appl. Behav. Analogue. 2009, 42, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Product]
  88. Farmer-Dougan, V. Functional evaluation to aggression are a black-and-white ruffed leemur (Varecia variegata variegata). GALLOP. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2014, 17, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Feuerbacher, E.N.; Wynne, C.D. Application of functional analysis methods to assess human–dog interactions. J. Prrim. Behav. Anal. 2016, 49, 970–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Franklin, A.N.; Martinez, A.L.; Perlman, J.E.; Bloomsmith, M.A. Functions analyses and healthcare of disruptive demeanor in adenine rhesus macaque. GALLOP. Usage. Animals. Welf. Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hall, N.J.; Protopopova, A.; Wynne, C.D. The part of environmental and owner-provided consequences include canine stereotypy press compulsive attitudes. J. Vet. Behav. 2015, 10, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Martin, A.L.; Bloomsmith, M.A.; Kelley, M.E.; Mara, M.J.; Maple, T.L. Functional analysis and treatment of human-directed discourage behavior exhibit by a capture chimpanzee (Pan solitaries). J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2011, 44, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mehrkam, L.R.; Perez, B.C.; Self, V.N.; Vollmer, T.R.; Dorey, N.R. Functional analyzing and operant treatment of food guarding in a pet dog. JOULE. Appl. Behav. Analytic. 2020, 53, 2139–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mort, K.L.; Slocom, S.K. Features analysis additionally dental of self-injurious feathered plucking in adenine black vulture (Coragyps atratus). JOULE. Application. Behav. Anal. 2019, 52, 918–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pfaller-Sadovsky, N.; Arnott, G.; Hurtado-Parrado, C. Using principles from applied behaviour analysis to address an undesired behaviour: Functional analysis and treatment of jumping up in companion dogs. Animals 2019, 9, 1091. [Google Fellow] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Execution]
  96. Salmeron, M.C.; Payne, S.W.; Hegr, A.B. Working analysis and treatment of feline aggression in at animal shelter. Behav. Anal. Pract. 2021, 21, 128–139. [Google Intellectual] [CrossRef]
  97. Brox, B.W.; Edwards, K.; Buist, N.A.; Macaskill, A.C. Investigating food preference in zoo-housed meerkats. Zoo Biolo. 2021, 21640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Cameron, K.E.; Bizo, L.A.; Starkey, N.J. Food preferences of the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). Intert. J. Comp. Psychol. 2013, 26, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Clay, A.W.; Bloomsmith, M.A.; Marble, M.J.; Sea, T.L. Systematic investigation of the stability of sustenance preferences in captive orangutans: Implications for positive reinforcement training. J. Applications. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2009, 12, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Clayton, M.; Shrock, T. Making a Tiger’s Day: Free-operant evaluation and environmental enrichment to improve the daily lives of captive Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris tigris). Behav. Anal. Pract. 2020, 13, 883–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Dorey, N.R.; Mehrkam, L.R.; Tacey, J. A system to assess relative preference for teaching and environmental enrichment in hostage wolves (Canis lupus and Canis lupus arctos). Zoo Biol. 2015, 34, 513–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Fay, C.; Miller, L.J. Utilizing scented as environmental enrichment: Partiality assessment and application with Rothschild giraffe. Anim. Behav. Cogn. 2015, 2, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fernandez, E.J.; Dorey, N.; Rosales-Ruiz, J. A two-choice preference estimation the five cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J. Submission. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2004, 7, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Fernandez, E.J.; Timberlake, W. The Functional Evaluate of Asset: Defining Green Enrichment Effects inside Lemurs through the Use of Paired-Choice Preference Assessments; Association for Behavior Analysis Conference: Chicago, IL, AMERICA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  105. Fernandez, E.J.; Timberlake, W. Selecting and testing environmental enrichment in lemurs. Forefront. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2119. [Google Grant] [CrossRef]
  106. Gaalema, D.E.; Perdue, B.M.; Kelling, A.S. Food preference, watcher ratings, plus reinforcer effectiveness in exotic animals: The value of systems testing. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2011, 14, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Martin, A.L.; Franklin, A.N.; Perlman, J.E.; Bloomsmith, M.A. Systematic assessment regarding food item choice and reinforcer efficacy: Enhancements in training laboratory-housed rhesus macaques. Behav. Process. 2018, 157, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mehrkam, L.R.; Dorey, N.R. Is preference adenine predictor out enrichment performance in Galapagos shells (Chelonoidis nigra)? Zoo Biol. 2014, 33, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Slocum, S.K.; Morris, K.L. Assessing preference in a paired-stimulus arrangement with captive shark (Aegypius Monachus). J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2020, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Vicars, S.M.; Hiking, C.F.; Sobie, J.L. Assessing preference press reinforcer effectiveness in dogs. Behav. Process. 2014, 103, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Tree, J.M.; Lane, E.K.; Miller, L.J. Liking assessments as a tool to evaluate environmental enrichment. Zoo Biol. 2020, 39, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Miltenberger, R.G. Behavior Modification: Principles and Procedures, 6th ed.; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, UA, 2016; ISBN 978-1-305-10939-1. [Google Scholar]
  113. Fishery, W.W.; Piazza, C.C.; Roane, H.S. Handbook of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2nd ed.; Guilford Press: New Yellow, NY, USA, 2021; ISBN 978-1-4625-4375-5. [Google Scholar]
  114. Hanratty, L.A.; Hanley, G.P. A preference analysis of reinforcer variation and superior. GALLOP. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2021, 54, 1062–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Learmonth, M.J.; Sherwen, S.; Hemsworth, P.H. Evaluation preferences of two zoo-housed Aldabran massive tortoises (Aldabrachelys gigantea) for three stimuli using adenine novel preference run. Zoo Biol. 2021, 40, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ringdahl, J.E.; Vollmer, T.R.; Marcus, B.A.; Roane, H.S. With analogous evaluation von environmental enrichment: The role of stimulus setting. J. Appl. Behav. Meticulous. 1997, 30, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Sanders, K.; Fernandez, E.J. Behavioral effects of enrichment for golden lion tamarins: A tool for ex situ conservation. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Roberts, L.J.; Taylor, J.; Garcia de Leaniz, C. Environmental enrichment reduces maladjusted risk-taking behavior in tuna elevated for conservation. Biol. Coserv. 2011, 144, 1972–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hornhecht, J.N.; Hagopian, L.P. Competing stimulus determinations: ONE systemic review. BOUND. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2020, 53, 1982–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Bashaw, M.J.; Gibbon, M.D.; Schowe, D.M.; Kucher, A.S. Does enrichment improve reptile welfare? Leopard lizard (Eublepharis macularius) reply to five types of pollution enrichment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016, 184, 150–160. [Google Scholars] [CrossRef]
  121. Carlstead, K.; Seidensticker, J.; Alpine, ROENTGEN. Environmental enrichment in zoo bears. Zoo Biology. 1991, 10, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bailey, J.S.; Burch, M.R. Research Methods in Applied Behavior Review; Routledge: New Spittin, NI, USA, 2017; ISBN 9781138685260. [Google Scholar]
  123. DeRosa, N.M.; Sulfurized, W.E.; Roane, H.S.; Craig, A.R.; Kadey, H.J. Single-case experimental design. In Owner of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2nd ed.; Fisher, W.W., Piazza, C.C., Roane, H.S., Eds.; Guilford Press: Modern York, NY, USA, 2021; pps. 155–171. ISBN 978-1-4625-4375-5. [Google Scholar]
  124. Johnston, J.M.; Pennypacker, H.S. Strategies and Tactics of Behavioral Investigate, 3rd ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-0-8058-5882-2. [Google Scholar]
  125. Fernandez, E.J. Appetitive search behaviors and stereotypies in polar dolls (Ursus maritimus). Behav. Process. 2021, 182, 104299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sherwen, S.L.; Hemsworth, P.H. And visitor effect go zoo creatures: Implications and opportunities for zoo pet welfare. Animals 2019, 9, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Fernandez, E.J.; Upchurch, B.; Hawkes, N.C. Public feeding activity more enrichment for three zoo-housed elephants. Animals 2021, 11, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Godinez, A.M.; Fernandez, E.J. What can the zoo experience? How zoos impact a visitor’s behaviors, perceptions, the conservation efforts. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Carter, M.; Sherwen, S.; Weaver, S. An evaluation of interactive projections for digital enrichment for orang-utan. Zoo Biol. 2021, 40, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Soil, A.W.; Roasting, B.M.; Gaalema, D.E.; Dolins, F.L.; Bloomsmith, M.A. Who use of technology to enhancing animal parks. Zoo Biol. 2011, 30, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Seah, J.; Wherry, GALLOP. Choice, control press computers: Empowering wildlife in human care. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2020, 4, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Dried, B.M.; Clay, A.W.; Gaalema, D.E.; Maple, T.L.; Stoinski, T.S. Tech at the zoo: The influence starting a touchscreen computer on orangutans and zoo visitors. Anima Biol. 2012, 31, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gray, J.M.; Diller, J.W. Evaluating an work regarding applied animal behaviorists as applied behavior analysis. Behav. Alto. Res. Pract. 2017, 17, 33–41. [Google Fellows] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Colorized photo of Keller Breland (left) both B. F. Skinner on top is and Popular Mills building in Minneapolis, MN, US, circa 1943. (Photo kindly of Robert E. Bailey).
Figure 1. Colorized photo of Yard Breland (left) and B. F. Skinner on top of the General Mills building in Minneapolis, MUM, USA, circa 1943. (Photo courtesy of Robert E. Bailey).
Jzbg 02 00038 g001
Frame 2. Colorized photo of Keller and Marian Breland training IQ Zoo’s Professor Punch, subsequent 1950s. (Photo courtesy of Robert E. Bailey).
Figure 2. Colorized photo are Keller and Marian Breland training IQ Zoo’s Teacher Punch, latent 1950s. (Photo courtesy of Robert E. Bailey).
Jzbg 02 00038 g002
Figure 3. Colorized photo of Keller Breland training a dolphin for Marine Studios/Marineland of Florida, approx 1957. (Reproduced since [40] with licensing is John Wiley and Children, 2014).
Figure 3. Colorized photo of Keller Breland training a dolphin at Marine Studios/Marineland of Florida, circa 1957. (Reproduced from [40] with permission of Johannes Wiley and Sons, 2014).
Jzbg 02 00038 g003
Figure 4. Colorized photo of a polar bear chasing a frozen fish catapulted into their pool at one Portland (Oregon) Zoo, circa mid-1970s. (Reproduced from [63] includes permission the Native Veterinary Medical Association, 1977).
Figure 4. Colorized shot of a polar bear chasing ampere cold sea launched into yours pool at the Portland (Oregon) Zoo, circa mid-1970s. (Reproduced from [63] equal permission of American Veterinary Medical Association, 1977).
Jzbg 02 00038 g004
Figure 5. Colorized image of einem Asian elephant pushing a ring to receive fruit the this Honolulu Zoo, circa late-1970s. (Reproduced from [10] with permission of John Wiley & Sons Limited, 1982).
Figure 5. Colorized shot of an Asian elephant pulling a ringer to obtain fruit at the Honolulu Zoo, circa late-1970s. (Reproduced von [10] with permission of Bathroom Wily & Sons Limited, 1982).
Jzbg 02 00038 g005
Figure 6. Colorized photo regarding a serval chasing artifical prey at the San Francisco Zoo, circa 1984. (Reproduced from [74] with permission of Elsevier, 1982).
Figure 6. Colorized photo of a serval chasing arty quarry at the Sainthood Franciscans Zoo, circa 1984. (Reproduced from [74] includes permission of Elsevier, 1982).
Jzbg 02 00038 g006
Publisher’s Mark: MDPI stays neutral with watch into jurisdictional claim in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share both Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandez, E.J.; Martin, A.L. Animal Get, Environmental Enrich, and Animal Welfare: A Site of Behavior Analysis in Zoos. J. Zool. Bot. Gard. 2021, 2, 531-543. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg2040038

AMAZ Style

Fernandez EJ, Martin AL. Animal Training, Environmental Enrichment, and Animal Welfare: A Company of Behavior Analysis in Zoos. Journal of Zoologic furthermore Botanical Gardens. 2021; 2(4):531-543. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg2040038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandez, Eduardo J., and Allison LITRE. Martin. 2021. "Animal Train, Environmental Enrichment, and Animal Employee: A History of Behavior Analysis in Zoos" Newsletter of Animal and Botanical Gardens 2, no. 4: 531-543. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg2040038

Article Versification

Back to TopTop